Biljana Plavšić, the former president of Republika Srpska, was indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. After she plead guilty and issued a remorseful statement, the prosecution dropped the genocide charges and she was sentenced to 11 years in prison, and subsequently granted early release. While in prison, she published lengthy memoirs in which she retracted her confession. In this article, I take a look back at Plavšić's ICTY case to put forward three principal arguments. First, the Plavšić case demonstrates significant inconsistencies in ICTY procedures and sentencing, which have important ramifications for other international justice cases. Second, the expectation and hope displayed by many international justice promoters that war crimes trials may lead to truthful confessions, apologies, or acknowledgments of abuses is not borne out by evidence. Finally, the Plavšić case demonstrates that the international justice focus on individualizing accountability for mass atrocity is ill equipped to deal with the collectivist nature of such crimes.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
BIRN, 13 November 2009. Plavšić's Welcome Provokes Outrage. Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. Available at <http://www.bim.ba/en/192/10/23650>.
Clark J.N.2009. “Plea Bargaining at the ICTY: Guilty Pleas and Reconciliation,” European Journal of International Law 20 (2): 415–36.
Combs N.A.2003. “Prosecutor v. Plavšić. Case No. IT-00-39&40/1-S,” The American Journal of International Law 97 (4): 929–37.
Cook J.A.2005. “Plea Bargaining at The Hague,” Yale Journal of International Law 30: 473–506.
Dana S., 2007. “Genocide, Reconciliation, and Sentencing in the Jurisprudence of the ICTY,” in The Criminal Law of Genocide: International, Comparative, and Contextual Aspects, Henham R., and Behrens P. (eds.) (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing): 259–74.
Del Ponte C.2009. Madame Prosecutor: Confrontations with Humanity's Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity (New York: Other Press).
Doak J.2011. “The Therapeutic Dimension of Transitional Justice: Emotional Repair and Victim Satisfaction in International Trials and Truth Commissions,” International Criminal Law Review 11: 263–98.
Drakulić S.2004. They Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague (New York: Viking).
Drumbl M.A.2007. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Gilani S.2010. “Transforming the ‘Perpetrator’ into ‘Victim’: The Effect of Gendering Violence on the Legal and Practical Responses to Women's Political Violence,” Australian Journal of Gender and Law 1: 1–40.
Glauber B. 17 December 2002. Sentence Hearings Start for “Iron Lady of Balkans,” Chicago Tribune.
Goldberg D.U. 26 January 2009. Bosnian War Criminal: ‘I Did Nothing Wrong’. The Local: Sweden's News in English. Available at <http://www.thelocal.se/17162/20090126>.
Hammer J. 22 January 2001 “‘The Empress’ Deposed,” Newsweek.
Harmon M.B., and Gaynor F., 2007. “Ordinary Sentences for Extraordinary Crimes,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (3): 683–712.
Henham R.2005. The Ethics of Plea Bargaining in International Criminal Trials. Liverpool Law Review 26 (3): 209–24.
Humanitarian Law Center, 2002. Acknowledgment, Taking of Responsibility, Remorse–The Way to Reconciliation (Belgrade: HLC).
ICTY. 17 December 2002. Prosecutor vs. Plavšić (IT-00-40-S): Sentencing Hearing.
———. 27 February 2003. Prosecutor vs. Biljana Plavšić (IT-00-39&40/1-S): ICTY Sentencing Judgment.
———. Case Information Sheet, “Bosnia and Herzegovina.” International Center for Transitional Justice, 2004. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice (New York: ICTJ).
Martinović I. 4 November 2009. Outcry at Plavšić's Belgrade Welcome. Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR). Available at <http://iwpr.net/print/report-news/outcry-plavsics-belgrade-welcome>.
McLoughlin P. 27 June 2003a. “Serb War Criminal Plavšić Goes to Swedish Jail,” Reuters.
———. 1 August 2003b. “War Criminal's Conditions Rile Guards,” Reuters.
Mendeloff D.2009. “Trauma and Vengeance: Assessing the Psychological and Emotional Effects of Post-Conflict Justice,” Human Rights Quarterly 31 (3): 592–623.
Mihajlović B. 11 November 2009. “Plavšić Return Seemingly Reflects Serbians Problem With Past,”. IWPR. Available at <http://iwpr.net/report-news/plavsic-return-seemingly-reflects-serbia%E2%80%99s-problem-past>.
Orentlicher D.F.2010. That Someone Guilty Be Punished: The Impact of the ICTY in Bosnia (New York: Open Society Justice Initiative and International Center for Transitional Justice).
Plavšić B.2005a. Svedočim [I Testify]. 1 (Banjaluka: Trioprint).
———. 2005b. Svedočim [I Testify]. 2 (Banjaluka: Trioprint).
Rauxloh R.E.2011. “Plea Bargaining in International Criminal Justice: Can the International Criminal Court Afford to Avoid Trials?” The Journal of Criminal Justice Research 1 (2): 1–25.
Simons M. 18 December 2002. “Crossing Paths: Albright Testifies in War Crimes Case,” The New York Times.
Sjoberg L.2010a. Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives (London: Routledge).
———. 2010b. Women and the Genocidal Rape of Women: The Gender Dynamics of Gendered War Crimes, in Confronting Global Gender Justice: Women's Lives, Human Rights,Bergoffen D. B., Gilbert P. R., Harvey T., McNeely C. L. (eds) (Abingdon: Routledge): 21–34.
Svet, September 6, 1993
Tieger A., and Shin M.. 2005. “Plea Agreements in the ICTY,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (3): 666–79.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2749 | 363 | 40 |
Full Text Views | 438 | 18 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 452 | 42 | 9 |
Biljana Plavšić, the former president of Republika Srpska, was indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. After she plead guilty and issued a remorseful statement, the prosecution dropped the genocide charges and she was sentenced to 11 years in prison, and subsequently granted early release. While in prison, she published lengthy memoirs in which she retracted her confession. In this article, I take a look back at Plavšić's ICTY case to put forward three principal arguments. First, the Plavšić case demonstrates significant inconsistencies in ICTY procedures and sentencing, which have important ramifications for other international justice cases. Second, the expectation and hope displayed by many international justice promoters that war crimes trials may lead to truthful confessions, apologies, or acknowledgments of abuses is not borne out by evidence. Finally, the Plavšić case demonstrates that the international justice focus on individualizing accountability for mass atrocity is ill equipped to deal with the collectivist nature of such crimes.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2749 | 363 | 40 |
Full Text Views | 438 | 18 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 452 | 42 | 9 |