The development of democracy in the successor states of Yugoslavia illustrates the whole range of differences among these states: from Slovenia which is considered most advanced and consolidated, over Croatia which is on its way to become a consolidated democratic state, to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia which are seen as still very fragile zones for democracy to take roots in. While scholars refer to these latter cases as to failed or unconsolidated democracies, this article argues against the common theoretical framework and calls for the use of different theoretical and methodological tools to measure the (un)success of these states. For this purpose this article discusses the main (internal) features and weaknesses of these democracies and points at a number of external factors and internal objective circumstances, which (unintentionally) hinder the process of democratization.
——. 2012. “
The Western Balkans are dead—long live the Balkans! Democratization and the limits of the EU” in DžihićV. and HamiltonD.S. (eds.) Unfinished Business The Western Balkans and the International Community (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).
Integrations- und Desintegrationsprozesse in multinationalen Gesellschaften. Einige Überlegungen zu den Theorien Otto Bauers und Karl Deutschs” in Schmidt-HartmannE. (ed.) Formen des Nationalen Bewußtseins im Lichte Zeitgenössischer Nationalismustheorien – Vorträge der Tagung des Collegium Carolinum in Bad Wiessee vom 31.10. bis 3.11.1991 (München: Oldenbourg): 113–127.
The Europeanization of ‘defective democracies’ in the Western Balkans: Pre-Accession challenges to democratic consolidation” in DeBardelebenJ. (ed.) The Boundaries of EU Enlargement: Finding a Place for Neighbours (London: Palgrave): 205–221.
CohenL. and LampeJ.. 2011. Embracing Democracy in the Western Balkans: From Postconflict Struggles toward European Integration (Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
DžihićV. and SegertD.. 2011. “
Lessons from ‘Post-Yugoslav’ democratization functional problems of stateness and the limits of democracy” East European Politics & Societies published online 3 May 2011. <http://eep.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/04/30/0888325411406436>.
——. 2012. “
Ohne Staat und Nation ist keine Demokratie zu machen. Bosnien und Herzegowina, Kosovo und Makedonien nach den Bürgerkriegen” Studien der Hessischen Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 17 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
State failure and nation-building” in HolzgrefeJ.L. and KeohaneR.O. (eds.) Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 299–321.
Speaking European: Conditionality, public attitudes and Pro-European party rhetoric in the Western Balkans” in BieberF. (ed.) EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans (London & New York: Routledge): 79–114.
Mungiu-PippidiA. and KrastevI.. 2004. “
Naučene lekcije: Izgradnja nacije i države posle komunizma” in A. Mungiu-Pippidi and KrastevI. (ed.) Nacionalizam Posle Komunizma – Naučene Lekcije (Belgrade: BFPI): 299–316.
RoederP. and RothchildD.. 2005. “
Power sharing as an impediment to peace and democracy” in P. Roeder and RothchildD. (eds.) Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press): 29–50.
ŠtiksI. and HorvatS.. 2012. “
Welcome to the desert of transition! Post-Socialism, the European Union, and a new left in the Balkans” Monthly Review63: 10. <http://monthlyreview.org/2012/03/01/welcome-to-the-desert-of-transition>.