Constrained Democracy: The Consolidation of Democracy in Yugoslav Successor States

in Southeastern Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The development of democracy in the successor states of Yugoslavia illustrates the whole range of differences among these states: from Slovenia which is considered most advanced and consolidated, over Croatia which is on its way to become a consolidated democratic state, to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia which are seen as still very fragile zones for democracy to take roots in. While scholars refer to these latter cases as to failed or unconsolidated democracies, this article argues against the common theoretical framework and calls for the use of different theoretical and methodological tools to measure the (un)success of these states. For this purpose this article discusses the main (internal) features and weaknesses of these democracies and points at a number of external factors and internal objective circumstances, which (unintentionally) hinder the process of democratization.

Constrained Democracy: The Consolidation of Democracy in Yugoslav Successor States

in Southeastern Europe

Sections

References

AndersonB. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism Revised and Ext (Edition. London/New York: Verso).

BalfourR. and StratulatC.. 2011. “ The democratic transformation of the BalkansEPC Issue Paper 66. <http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1363_the_democratic_transformation_of_the_balkans.pdf>.

BieberF. 2009. “ Less diversity—more integration: Interethnic relations in the contemporary BalkansSoutheastern Europe 31–32: 2338.

——. 2011. “ Building impossible states? State-Building strategies and EU membership in the Western BalkansEurope-Asia Studies 63(10): 17831802.

——. 2012. “ The Western Balkans are dead—long live the Balkans! Democratization and the limits of the EU” in DžihićV. and HamiltonD.S. (eds.) Unfinished Business The Western Balkans and the International Community (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).

BieberF. and KeilS.. 2009. “ Power-Sharing revisited—lessons learned in the Balkans?Review of Central and East European Law 3(4): 337360.

BoduszyńskiM. 2010. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States. Divergent Paths towards a New Europe (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

BrennerC. 1994. “ Integrations- und Desintegrationsprozesse in multinationalen Gesellschaften. Einige Überlegungen zu den Theorien Otto Bauers und Karl Deutschs” in Schmidt-HartmannE. (ed.) Formen des Nationalen Bewußtseins im Lichte Zeitgenössischer Nationalismustheorien – Vorträge der Tagung des Collegium Carolinum in Bad Wiessee vom 31.10. bis 3.11.1991 (München: Oldenbourg): 113127.

BrusisM. 2008. “ Evidence of convergence? The Western Balkan countries in democracy and governance assessmentsSoutheast European and Black Sea Studies 8(4): 379397.

CohenL. 2007The Europeanization of ‘defective democracies’ in the Western Balkans: Pre-Accession challenges to democratic consolidation” in DeBardelebenJ. (ed.) The Boundaries of EU Enlargement: Finding a Place for Neighbours (London: Palgrave): 205221.

CohenL. and LampeJ.. 2011. Embracing Democracy in the Western Balkans: From Postconflict Struggles toward European Integration (Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

DiamondL. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

DžihićV. and SegertD.. 2011. “ Lessons from ‘Post-Yugoslav’ democratization functional problems of stateness and the limits of democracyEast European Politics & Societies published online 3 May 2011. <http://eep.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/04/30/0888325411406436>.

DžihićV. and WieserA.. 2011. “ Incentives for democratisation? Effects of EU conditionality on democracy in Bosnia & HercegovinaEurope-Asia Studies 63(10): 18031825.

EkiertG.KubikJ. and VachudovaM.A.. 2007. “ Democracy in the post-communist World: An unending quest?East European Politics & Societies 21: 730.

ErnstA. 2011. “ Nord-Kosovo: Die Krise als ChanceSüdosteuropa Mitteilungen 5–6: 2637.

FukuyamaF. 2004. State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century (London: Profile Books).

GromesT. 2007. Demokratisierung nach Bürgerkriegen. Das Beispiel Bosnien und Herzegowina Studien der Hessischen Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung Band 56 (Frankfurt/New York: Campus).

——. 2012. “ Ohne Staat und Nation ist keine Demokratie zu machen. Bosnien und Herzegowina, Kosovo und Makedonien nach den BürgerkriegenStudien der Hessischen Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 17 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

GrugelJ. 2002. Democratization: A Critical Introduction (New York: Palgrave).

Grzymala-BusseA. 2007. “ Encouraging effective democratic competitionEast European Politics & Societies 21: 91110.

HeldD. 1996. Models of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).

HrochM. 1990. “ How much does Nation formation depend on Nationalism?East European Politics & Society 4(1) (Winter): 101115.

——. 1996. “ From National movement to the fully-formed Nation: The Nation-Building process in Europe” in BalakrishnanG. (ed.) Mapping the Nation (London: Verso): 7897.

HöpkenW. 2009. “ Gibt es eine ‘balkanische’ politische Kultur?Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 6: 3047.

IgnatieffM. 2003. “ State failure and nation-building” in HolzgrefeJ.L. and KeohaneR.O. (eds.) Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 299321.

KonitzerA. 2012. “ Speaking European: Conditionality, public attitudes and Pro-European party rhetoric in the Western Balkans” in BieberF. (ed.) EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans (London & New York: Routledge): 79114.

KrastevI. 2002. “ The Balkans. Democracy without choicesJournal of Democracy 13(3): 3953.

LinzJ. and StepanA.. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe South America and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

MatićJ. 2011. Citizens’ Perceptions of Serbia as ‘Mixed Democracy’ – Internal Report (Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences).

MerkelW. 2004. “ Embedded and defective democraciesDemocratization 11(5): 3358.

——. 2007. “ Gegen alle Theorie? Die Konsolidierung der Demokratie in OstmitteleuropaPolitische Vierteljahresschrift 48: 413433.

Mungiu-PippidiA. 2005. “ Deconstructing Balkan particularism: The ambiguous social capital of Southeastern EuropeSoutheast European and Black Sea Studies 5: 4968.

Mungiu-PippidiA. and KrastevI.. 2004. “ Naučene lekcije: Izgradnja nacije i države posle komunizma” in A. Mungiu-Pippidi and KrastevI. (ed.) Nacionalizam Posle Komunizma – Naučene Lekcije (Belgrade: BFPI): 299316.

Noutcheva G. and Aydin-DüzgitS.. 2012. “ Lost in Europeanisation: The Western Balkans and TurkeyWest European Politics 35(1): 5978.

OffeC. 1991. “ Das Dilemma der Gleichzeitigkeit. Demokratisierung und Marktwirtschaft in OsteuropaMerkur 4: 279292.

PavlovićD. and AntonićS.. 2007. Konsolidacija demokratskih ustanova u Srbiji Posle 2000. Godine (Beograd: Službeni glasnik).

PešićV. 2007. State Capture and Widespread Corruption in SerbiaCEPS Working Document No. 262. <http://www.ceps.be/book/state-capture-and-widespread-corruption-serbia>.

PollackD. 13. September 2004. “ Nationalismus und Europaskepsis in den postkommunistischen Staaten Mittel- und OsteuropasAus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 38/2004: 3038.

Pop-ElechesG. 2007. “ Between historical legacies and the promise of Western integration: Democratic conditionality after communismEast European Politics & Societies 21: 142161.

RaikK. 2004. “ EU accession of Central and Eastern European Countries: Democracy and integration as conflicting logicsEast European Politics & Societies 18: 567594.

RoederP. and RothchildD.. 2005. “ Power sharing as an impediment to peace and democracy” in P. Roeder and RothchildD. (eds.) Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press): 2950.

Ruiz-JiménezA.M. and TorreblancaJ.I.. 2008. Is There a Trade-off between Deepening and Widening? What do Europeans Think? CEPIN Working Paper 17. <http://www.ceps.eu/files/book/1632.pdf>.

SnyderJ. 2000. From Voting to Violence. Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (New York: Norton).

StefanovicD. 2008. “ The path to Weimar Serbia? Explaining the resurgence of the Serbian far right after the fall of MilosevicEthnic and Racial Studies 31(7): 11951221.

ŠtiksI. and HorvatS.. 2012. “ Welcome to the desert of transition! Post-Socialism, the European Union, and a new left in the BalkansMonthly Review 63: 10. <http://monthlyreview.org/2012/03/01/welcome-to-the-desert-of-transition>.

28)

 Also see Bieber (2011).

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 46 46 19
Full Text Views 59 59 36
PDF Downloads 12 12 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0