Hegemonic Relationships: Donor Countries and NGOs in Western Balkan Post-Conflict Reconstruction

In: Southeastern Europe

The impact of Non-Governmental Organizations’ reconstruction activities in Bosnia and Kosovo was largely determined by the nature and content of two dominant relationships. The first is the donor countries-International NGO (INGO) relationship. To grasp the importance of this relationship, it suffices to mention that, at the global level, donors give around five times more funds to INGOs (and more precisely to their own national NGOs) than to Local NGOs (LNGOs). The second is the International NGO-LNGO relationship. With respect to the first relationship, donor countries had a clear hegemonic position vis-à-vis INGOs. In turn, INGOs developed a hegemonic position towards LNGOs. These hegemonic relationships undermined the quality and effectiveness of aid disbursed and failed to promote the development of an open and democratic civil society. More interestingly, although most donors and INGOs got involved in the post-conflict reconstruction of both countries, very weak learning processes seem to have operated in the region. A comparative examination of the two reconstruction efforts reveals that the manifestation of many inefficiencies and failures was indeed even more acute in Kosovo than in Bosnia.

  • AggC. 2006. “ Winners or Losers? NGOs in the Current Aid ParadigmDevelopment 49/2: 1521.

  • ApthorpeR. 20 March 2002. “ Was international emergency relief aid in Kosovo ‘humanitarian’?Humanitarian Exchange (Overseas Development Institute –ODI: Humanitarian Practice Network): 2123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BalaA. 10 May 2002. “ UN: Conference Concludes NGOs Have Often Failed In Efforts To Develop Civil SocietyRFE/RL. Available at: <http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1099665.html>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BelloniR. 2001. “ Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and HerzegovinaJournal of Peace Research 38/2: 163180.

  • BerggrenB. and OlinA.. 2004. Evaluation of Finland’s Development Cooperation with Bosnia and Herzegovina (Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Public Administration – SIPU: Report 2).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bojicić-DzelilovićV. 2002. “ World Bank, NGOs and the Private Sector in Post-War ReconstructionInternational Peacekeeping 9/2: 8198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CareyH. F. 2003. “ Conclusion: NGO Dilemmas in Peace ProcessesInternational Peacekeeping 10/1: 172179.

  • ChiodiL. 2002. “ Promoting Civil Society: Local NGOs in the Balkans since the 90s” in BianchiniS.SchöpflinG. and ShoupP. (eds.) Post-Communist Transition as a European Problem (Ravenna: Longo Editore Ravenna): 5978.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CollingwoodV. 2006. “ Non-governmental organisations, power and legitimacy in international societyReview of International Studies 32/3: 439454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CooleyA. and RonJ.. 2002. “ The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational ActionInternational Security 27/1: 539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CoyneC. J. 2006. “ Reconstructing Weak and Failed States: Foreign Intervention and the Nirvana FallacyForeign Policy Analysis 2/4: 343360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CurrionP. 2001. Strength in Numbers: A Review Of NGO Coordination in the Field. Case Study: Kosovo 1999-2002 (International Council of Voluntary Agencies – ICVA). Available at: <http://www.icva.ch/doc00004595.pdf>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • del CastilloG. 2008. Rebuilding War-Torn States: The Challenge of Post-Conflict Economic Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DemichelisJ. June 1998. NGOs and Peacebuilding in Bosnia’s Ethnically Divided Cities (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Special Report). Available at: < June http://www.usip.org/files/resources/SR32.pdf>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DevicA. 2006. “ Transnationalization of Civil Society in Kosovo: International and Local Limits of Peace and MulticulturalismEthnopolitics 5/3: 257273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DrazicI. 18 June 2001. “ Non-government Sector Still Weak: International Community Takes Charge of Money and ResponsibilityAIM. Available at: <http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/trae/archive/data/200106/10629-001-trae-sar.htm>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DuffieldM. 1997. “ NGO relief in war zones: towards an analysis of the new aid paradigmThird World Quarterly 18/3: 527542.

  • EdwardsM. and HulmeD.. 1996. “ Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Non-governmental organizationsWorld Development 24/6: 961973.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans-KentB. and BleikerR.. 2010. “ NGOs and Reconstructing Civil Society in Bosnia and HerzegovinaInternational Peacekeeping 10/1: 103119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FaganA. 2005. “ Civil society in Bosnia ten years after DaytonInternational Peacekeeping 12/3: 406419.

  • ——. 2010. Europe’s Balkan Dilemma. Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? (London: I. B. Tauris).

  • FawcettJ. and TannerV.. 2000. The Political Repercussions of Emergency Programs: A Review of USAID’s Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance in the Former Yugoslavia (1991-1996) (Washington, DC: Checchi Consulting and Co). Available at: <http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACJ890.pdf>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GagnonV. P.Jr. 2002. “ International NGOs in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Attempting to Build Civil Society” in MendelsonS. E. and GlennJ. K. (eds.) The Power and Limits of NGOs (New York: Columbia University Press): 207231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallagherT. 2005. The Balkans in the New Millennium. In the shadow of war and peace (London: Routledge).

  • GrodelandA. B. 2010. “ ‘They Have Achieved a Lot Because we Have Paid Them to do a Lot:’ NGOs and the International Community in the West Balkans. Perceptions of Each OtherGlobal Society 24/2: 173201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HadzihalilovicS. 28 September 1999. “ Non-Governmental Organisations in B&H: From Declaration on Rights to the Country of the ChildAIM. Available at: <http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/trae/archive/data/199909/90928-004-trae-sar.htm>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JarvikL. 2007. “ NGOs: A ‘New Class’ in International RelationsOrbis 51/2: 217238.

  • KatanaG. 26 September 1999. “ NGOs in Republika Srpska: Bashful Support of the RegimeAIM. Available at: <http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/trae/archive/data/199909/90926-002-trae-sar.htm>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KingD. 2005. “ Parallel routes to recovery: community priorities and NGO policy in the post civil war reconstruction of Sierra LeoneInternational Journal of Emergency Management 2/3: 149162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KlarreichK. and PolmanL.. 31 October 2012. “ The NGO Republic of HaitiThe Nation. Available at: <http://www.thenation.com/article/170929/ngo-republic-haiti>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NORAD. 2010a. Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans (Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Volume I. Evaluation Report 7/2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NORAD. 2010b. Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with the Western Balkans (Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Volume II. Evaluation Report 7/2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NunnenkampP. and ÖhlerH.. 2012. “ Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs: An Empirical Analysis of Non-charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign AidKyklos 65/1: 81110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD. 2011. How DAC members work with civil society organizations: An overview (Paris: OECD).

  • ParisR. 1997. “ Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal InternationalismInternational Security 22/2: 5489.

  • RieffD. 2000. “ Kosovo’s Humanitarian CircusWorld Policy Journal 17/3: 2532.

  • SampsonS. 2002. “ From forms to norms: global projects and local practices in the Balkan NGO sceneJournal of Human Rights 2/3: 329337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SandgrenC. 1999. Sweden’s Assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Study of Aid Management and Related Policy Issues (Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. Department of Central and Eastern Europe. SIDA Evaluation 99/24).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott-FlynnN. 15 November 1999. “ Coordination in Kosovo: the challenge for the NGO sectorRRF Newsletter (Overseas Development Institute – ODI. Relief and Rehabilitation Network): 79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchlomsM. 2003. “ Humanitarian NGOs in Peace ProcessesInternational Peacekeeping 10/1: 4055.

  • SekulicG. 16 April 2000. “ Change of Power and NGOs in B&H: (Un)Founded Optimism or Petritsch For KingAIM. Available at: <http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/trae/archive/data/200004/00416-004-trae-sar.htm>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SimmonsP. J. 1998. “ Learning to Live with NGOsForeign Policy 112: 8296.

  • SmillieI. and EvensonK.. 2003. “ Sustainable Civil Society or Service Delivery Agencies? The Evolution of Non-governmental Organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina” in DijkzeulD. and BeigbederY. (eds.) Rethinking International Organizations: Pathology & Promise (Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books): 287306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmillieI. and TodorovićG.. 2001. “ Reconstructing Bosnia, Constructing Civil Society: Disjuncture and Convergence” in SmillieI. (ed.) Patronage or partnership: local capacity building in humanitarian crises (Bloomfield, USA: Kumarian Press, Inc.): 2550.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SterlandB. 20 June 2006. Civil Society Capacity Building in Post-Conflict Societies: The Experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo (Oxford: International NGO Training and Research Centre – INTRAC. Praxis Paper 9).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 197 124 5
Full Text Views 131 9 1
PDF Downloads 13 5 0