Search for other papers by Blagovesta Cholova in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Prof. Jean-Michel De Waele in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article explores the success of populist parties in Bulgaria during the last decade. The first section focuses on the definition of populism and identifies the main populist parties in this country. The second part presents the development of these parties and their specific characteristic as well as the evolution of the “three waves” of populism in Bulgaria. The last section addresses the reasons for the success of these parties both in terms of supply side (the electorate) and the demand side (the strategy of the parties). The main conclusion is that this country is a fertile ground for populist movements due to the attitude of the electorate and the niche on the right-side of the political spectrum and that newly created parties use this opportunity of win elections but they remain short-lived because they cannot continue to mobilize populist rhetoric when they are in office and often face rapid decline.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Albertazzi D., and McDonnell D. (eds.). 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy (London: Palgrave).
-
Andreev S.2009. “Is Populism the “Bad Wolf? Post-Accession Crisis of Representative Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania,” Studies in public policy (Aberdeen: University of Strathclyde: Centre for the Study of Public Policy).
-
Barr R.2009. “Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics,” Party Politics 15(1): 29–48.
-
Betz H.-G.1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe (Palgrave Macmillan).
-
Bolleyer N.2010. “Survival of the Fittest? The Persistence of New Parties in Western Europe.” Paper presented at Etmaal Conference (Leuven).
-
Canovan M.1981. Populism (London: Junction Books).
-
——. 1999. “Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy,” Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.
-
Capelle-Pogacean and Ragaru. 2006. “La dérive contestataire en Roumanie et en Bulgarie,” Le Courrier des pays de l’Est 2(1054): 44–51.
-
Cholova B., 2012. “Bulgaria,” in Havlik V., and Pinkova A. (eds), Populist political parties in East-central Europe (Brno: Masaryk University: International Institute of Political science).
-
Cholova B., and De Waele J-M.. 2011. “Bulgaria: A Fertile Ground for Populism?” Slovak Journal of Political Science 1: 25–54.
-
Deegan-Krause K., and Haughton T.. 2009. “Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia,” Politics and Policy 37(4): 821–841.
-
Freeden M.1998. “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?” Political Studies 46(4): 748–765.
-
Hanley S. et al. 2008. “Sticking Together: Explaining Comparative Centre-Right Party Success in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe,” Party Politics 14(4): 407–434.
-
Heinisch R.2003. “Success in Opposition – Failure in Government: Explaining the Performance of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Public Office,” in West European Politics 26(3): 91–130.
-
Ionescu G., and Gellner E., . 1969. “Introduction,” in Ionescu G., and Gellner E. (eds), Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).
-
Jagers J., and Walgrave S.. 2007. “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium,” European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 319–345.
-
Kitschelt H.1989. The Logic of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press).
-
——. 1994. The Transformation of European Social democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-
Mény Y., and Surel Y. 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
-
Muller W.C., and Strom K.. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-
Mustillo T.2006. “Entrants in the Political Arena: New Party Trajectories in Latin America.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (Marriott Loews Philadelphia: June, 24th).
-
Mudde C.2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist,” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563.
-
——. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-
Pauwels T.2011. “Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium,” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(1): 97–119.
-
Pop-Eleches G.2010. “Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism,” World Politics 62(2): 221–26.
-
Ramet R. (ed). 1999. The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe Since 1989 (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).
-
Roberts K.2008. “Hyperaccountability: Economic voting in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Electoral studies 27: 533–46.
-
Schedler A.1996. “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties,” Party Politics 2(3): 291–312.
-
Sikk A.2005. “How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe,” in European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 391–412.
-
Sikk A., and Hanley S.. 2012. “Paths to “Centrist Populism”? Explaining the Emergence of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties.” Paper presented in the IPSA World Congress (Madrid: 8–12 July 2012).
-
Sikk A.2012. “Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties,” in Party Politics 18(4): 465–486.
-
Stanley B.2008. “The thin ideology of populism,” in Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110.
-
Taggart P.2000. Populism (Buckingham: Open University Press).
-
Taguieff P.-A.1986. “La doctrine du national-populisme en France,” in Etudes 364(1): 27–46.
-
——. 1997. “Le populisme et la science politique. Du mirage conceptuel aux vrais problèmes,” Vingtième siècle. Revue d’histoire 56: 4–33.
-
——. 2002. L’illusion populiste (Paris : Éditions Berg International).
-
Weyland K.2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept. Populism in the Study of Latin American. Politics,” in Comparative Politics 34(1): 1–22.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1285 | 211 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 304 | 12 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 236 | 45 | 0 |
Search for other papers by Blagovesta Cholova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Prof. Jean-Michel De Waele in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article explores the success of populist parties in Bulgaria during the last decade. The first section focuses on the definition of populism and identifies the main populist parties in this country. The second part presents the development of these parties and their specific characteristic as well as the evolution of the “three waves” of populism in Bulgaria. The last section addresses the reasons for the success of these parties both in terms of supply side (the electorate) and the demand side (the strategy of the parties). The main conclusion is that this country is a fertile ground for populist movements due to the attitude of the electorate and the niche on the right-side of the political spectrum and that newly created parties use this opportunity of win elections but they remain short-lived because they cannot continue to mobilize populist rhetoric when they are in office and often face rapid decline.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1285 | 211 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 304 | 12 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 236 | 45 | 0 |