The eu’s Pathological Power: The Failure of External Rule of Law Promotion in South Eastern Europe

in Southeastern Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

What impact does the European Union (eu) have on the development of the rule of law in South Eastern Europe (see)? The author of this article argues and shows that the eu has: 1) a positively reinforcing (healthy) effect with regard to judicial capacity and substantive legality, i.e. the alignment of domestic legislation with international standards, and 2) a negatively reinforcing (pathological) effect with regard to judicial impartiality and formal legality (the inner morality of law). The author explains the pathological impact of eu-driven rule of law reforms by referring to the eu’s deficient reform approach and to unfavorable domestic conditions, which in their interplay reinforce certain reform pathologies (legal instability, incoherence, politicization) that undermine the rule of law. The main argument is supported by a mixed method study. A quantitative indicator-based analysis measures rule of law development across four key dimensions on the basis of a variety of data (e.g. survey-based indicators, cepej data, and a unique dataset on legislative output). Additionally, the author draws on a number of qualitative interviews that he conducted with magistrates from see and representatives from the eu, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Council of Europe. The author concludes from these findings that external rule of law promotion in weak rule of law countries is not transformative, but rather reinforces systemic deficiencies that undermine the rule of law.

Sections

References

AghA.1998. The Politics of Central Europe (London: Sage).

AlkonC.2010. “Plea Bargaining as a Legal Transplant: A Good Idea for Troubled Criminal Justice Systems?”Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 19(2): 355418.

BelloniR., and StrazzariF.2014. “Corruption in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: a deal among friends”Third World Quarterly 35(5): 855871.

BeširevićV.2014. “Governing without judges: The politics of the Constitutional Court in Serbia”International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(4): 954979.

BobekM. and KosarD.2014. “Global Solutions, Local Damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe”German Law Journal 15(2): 12571292.

BörzelT. A. and PamukY.2012. “Pathologies of Europeanisation: fighting corruption in the Southern Caucasus”West European Politics 35(1): 7997.

BozhilovaD.2007. “Measuring Successes and Failures of Eu-Europeanization in the Eastern Enlargement: Judicial Reform in Bulgaria”European Journal of Law Reform 9(2): 285319.

CapusselaA. L.2015. State-Building in Kosovo: Democracy, Corruption and the eu in the Balkans (London: IB Tauris).

ChannellW.2006. “Lessons Not Learned: Problems with Western Aid for Law Reform in Post-Communist Countries”Journal of Comparative Law, 1(2): 321337.

ComanR.2014. “Quo vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe”Europe-Asia Studies 66(6): 892924.

CreswellJ.2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (London: Sage).

DallaraC.2014. Democracy and judicial reforms in South-East Europe. Between the eu and the legacies of the past (Cham: Springer).

DimitrovG., HaralampievK., StoychevS. and Toneva-MetodievaL.2014. The Cooperation and Verification Mechanism: Shared Political Irresponsibility between the European Commission and the Bulgarian Governments (Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press).

DimitrovaG.2002. “The limits of Europeanization: Hegemony and its misuse in the political field of Bulgaria”Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 2(2): 6992.

EkiertG., & HansonS. E.2003. Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

EkiertG., KubikJ. and VachudováM. A.2007. “Democracy in the Post-Communist World: An Unending Quest?”East European Politics and Societies 21(1): 730.

ElbasaniA. (ed.). 2013. European integration and transformation in the western Balkans. Europeanization or business as usual? (New York: Routledge).

FaganA.2005. “Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic”Democratization 12(4): 528547.

FullerL. L.1969. The morality of law (New Haven, London: Yale University Press).

GoetzK. H., and ZubekR.2007. “Government, Parliament and Law-making in Poland”The Journal of Legislative Studies 13(4): 517538.

GrabbeH.2006. The eu’s transformative power. Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

Grzymala-BusseA. M.2002. Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

HallP. A.1993. “Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain”Comparative politics 25(3): 275296.

JacobyW.2006. “Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations”World Politics 58(4): 623651.

kipred. 2011. “The Inseparable Power: An analysis of the independence of the judiciary in Kosovo”<http://www.kipred.org/advCms/documents/84611_Inseparable_power_eng_final.pdf>.

KlitgaardR.1998International Cooperation Against Corruption.” Finance and Development 35(1): 36.

KochenovD.2008. eu enlargement and the failure of conditionality. Pre-accession conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer).

KuzmovaY.2014. “Bulgarian Specialized Criminal Court after One Year: A Misplaced Transplant, an Instrument of Justice, or a Tool of Executive Power”Boston University International Law Journal 32: 227262.

LandmanT.2004. “Measuring Human Rights: Principle, Practice and Policy”Human Rights Quarterly 26(4): 906931.

LevitzP. and Pop-ElechesG.2010. “Why No Backsliding? The European Union’s Impact on Democracy and Governance Before and After Accession”Comparative Political Studies 43(4): 457485.

MeagherP.2005. “Anti‐corruption agencies: Rhetoric Versus reality”The Journal of Policy Reform 8(1): 69103.

MagenA.2007. “Transformative Engagement through Law: The Acquis Communautaire as an Instrument of eu External Influence”European Journal of Law Reform 9(3): 361392.

MagenA. and MorlinoL.2009. International actors, democratization and the rule of law. Anchoring democracy? (New York: Routledge).

MendelskiM.2009. “The Impact of the European Union on Governance Reforms in Post-Communist Europe: A Comparison between First and Second-Wave Candidates”Romanian Journal of Political Science 9(2): 4264.

———. 2011. “Rule of Law Reforms in the Shadow of Clientelism: The Limits of the eu’s Transformative Power in Romania”Polish Sociological Review 2 (174): 235253.

———. 2012. “eu-Driven Judicial Reforms in Romania: A Success Story?”East European Politics 28(1): 2342.

———. 2013a. “Where does the European Union make a Difference? Rule of Law Development in the Western Balkans and beyond” in A. Elbasani, European integration and the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? (London: Routledge), pp. 101–118.

———. 2013b. “They Have Failed Again! Donor-driven Promotion of the Rule of Law in Serbia”Südost-Europa: Zeitschrift für Politik und Gesellschaft 61(1): 79113.

MendelskiM. and LibmanA.. 2014. “Demand for Litigation in the Absence of Traditions of Rule of Law: An Example of Ottoman and Habsburg Legacies in Romania”Constitutional Political Economy 25(2): 177206.

Mungiu-PippidiA.2014. “The Transformative Power of Europe Revisited”Journal of Democracy 25(1): 2032.

MyrdalG.1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions (London: Gerald Druckworth).

NorthD. C., WallisJ. J. and WeingastB. R.2009. Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

NoutchevaG. and BechevD.2008. “The Successful Laggards: Bulgaria and Romania’s Accession to the euEast European Politics & Societies 22(1): 114144.

osce. 2009. “Legal analysis: independence of the judiciary” <http://www.osce.org/skopje/67584?download=true>.

———. 2012. Independence of the Judiciary in Kosovo: Institutional and Functional Dimensions, <http://www.osce.org/kosovo/87138?download=true>.

ParauC. E.2015. “Explaining Governance of the Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: External Incentives, Transnational Elites and Parliamentary Inaction”Europe-Asia Studies 67(3): 409442.

PeshkopiaR.2014. Conditioning Democratization: Institutional Reforms and eu Membership Conditionality in Albania and Macedonia (London: Anthem Press).

PianaD.2009. “The Power Knocks at the Courts’ Back Door: Two Waves of Postcommunist Judicial Reforms”Comparative Political Studies 42(6): 816840.

Pop‐ElechesG.2007. “Historical legacies and post‐communist regime change”Journal of Politics 69(4): 908926.

PradoM., and TrebilcockM.2009. “Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform”University of Toronto Law Journal 59(3): 341380.

PridhamG.2005. Designing democracy. e.u. enlargement and regime change in post-communist Europe (New York: Palgrave).

RadinA.2014. “Analysis of current events: towards the rule of law in Kosovo: eulex should go”Nationalities Papers 42(2): 181194.

RisteskaM.2013. “The role of the eu in promoting good governance in Macedonia: towards efficiency and effectiveness or deliberative democracy?”Nationalities Papers 41(3): 431446.

SadurskiW.2004. “Accession’s democracy dividend: The impact of the eu enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of Central and Eastern Europe”European Law Journal 10(4): 371401.

SchimmelfennigF.2012. “Europeanization beyond Europe”Living Reviews in European Governance 7(1): 131.

SchimmelfennigF. and SedelmeierU.2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

Seibert-FohrA.2012. Judicial independence in transition (Berlin: Springer).

BosniaSigma. 2012. “Bosnia and Herzegovina Assessment Report 2012” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2012/06, oecd. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz2rqlcrnkd-en>.

MontenegroSigma. 2012. “Montenegro Assessment Report 2012” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2012/03, oecd, <http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz2rqn827d2-en>.

KosovoSigma. 2011. “Sigma Assessment Report 2011” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2011/05, oecd <http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/48970710.pdf>.

SimmonsB. A.2009. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

SpendzharovaA. B., and VachudovaM. A.2012. “Catching up? Consolidating liberal democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after eu accession”West European Politics 35(1): 3958.

StewartS.2009. “The interplay of domestic contexts and external democracy promotion: lessons from Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus”Democratization 16(4): 804824.

TamanahaB. Z.2004. On the rule of law. History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

TeubnerG.1998. “Legal irritants: good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergencies”The Modern Law Review 61(1): 1132.

Toneva-MetodievaL.2014. “Beyond the Carrots and Sticks Paradigm: Rethinking the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Experience of Bulgaria and Romania”Perspectives on European Politics and Society 15(4): 534551.

VachudovaM. A.2005. Europe undivided. Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Figures

  • Development of substantive legality (rule approximation) in see.

    View in gallery
  • Development of formal legality (legislative output) in see.

    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 7
Full Text Views 9 9 8
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0