This paper draws upon my fieldwork at the Festival of Gay and Lesbian Film in Ljubljana to examine how “Europeanness” is used to ground the legitimacy of minoritarian organizations, but also to question the assumptions implicit in such claims to belonging. I argue that the discourse of Europeanness is used in similarly ambivalent ways in both Slovenian lgbt activism and official Slovenian politics: for political and institutional legitimization that also performs a distancing from the post-Yugoslav region. This discursive distancing serves to hide the constant processes of negotiation of belonging within the eu as well as ongoing practical cooperation and communication within the post-Yugoslav region. Attention to such strategic tensions opens up a possibility of formulating a critique of the discourse that posits Europeanization as the only possible future for the region and Europe as an imagined space of tolerance for minorities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bakic-Hayden M.1995. “Nesting Orientalisms: The case of former Yugoslavia”, Slavic Review, 54 (1): 917–931.
Braidotti R.1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. (New York: Columbia University Press).
Chakrabarty D.1992. “Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who speaks for ‘Indian’ pasts?”, Representations, 37: 1–26.
Dioli I.2009. “Back to a nostalgic future: the Queeroslav utopia”, Sextures, 1 (1): 1–21.
Dobnikar M., and Pamuković N.. (eds.). 2009. Ja Ti One… Za Nas – Dokumenti Jugoslovenskih Feminističkih Skupova. (Ljubljana and Zagreb: Vita Activa and Center for Women War Victims ROSA).
Evans O.2007. “Border exchanges: The role of the European film festival”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 15 (1): 23–33.
Fink-Hafner D., 2010. “Slovenia since 1989”, 235–258, in Ramet S. P. (ed.), Central and Southeast European Politics since 1989. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Gamson J.1995. “Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma”, Social Problems, 42 (3): 390–407.
Gržinić M., , Šmid A., and Simčić Z. T.. 2012. “Relations. 25 years of škuc-ll”, <http://grzinic-smid.si/?p=276> (accessed on 25 August 2015).
Halberstam J.2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. (New York: NYU Press).
Festival of Lesbian and Gay Film. 2010a. “26. Festival lezbičnega in gejevskega filma”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/26/katalog.pdf> (accessed on 22 February 2013).
Festival of Lesbian and Gay Film. 2010b. “Ob letošnjem festivalu”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/26/ob-letosnjem-festivalu> (accessed on 8 December 2012).
Festival of Lesbian and Gay Film. 2012. “Pogovori z našimi filmskimi partnerji”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/28/katalog-0> (accessed on 11 December 2012).
Kanzleiter B., 2008. “Yugoslavia”, 219–228, in Klimke M., and Scharloth J. (eds.), 1968 in Europe: A History of Protest and Activism, 1956–1977. (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Jalušić V., 1999. “Women in post-Socialist Slovenia”, 109–131, in Ramet S. P. (ed.), Gender Politics in the Western Balkans: Women and Society in Yugoslavia and Yugoslav Successor States. (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press).
Mitrović M., 2014. “Nostalgia and utopia in post-Yugoslav feminist genealogies in the light of Europeanization”, 135–161, in Petrović T. (ed.), Mirroring Europe: Ideas of Europe and Europeanization in Balkan Societies. (Amsterdam: Brill).
O’Dwyer C.2012. “Does the eu help or hinder gay-rights movements in post-communist Europe? The case of Poland”, East European Politics, 28 (4): 332–352.
Petrović T., 2010. “Nesting colonialisms: Austria, Slovenia, and discourses on the Western Balkans in the context of the eu enlargement”, 1–12, in Kreft L., and Benderly J. (eds.), Do Good Fences Make Friendly Neighbors? Inclusion and Exclusion in and on the Borders of Europe. (Ljubljana: The Peace Institute).
Petrović T., 2014. “Introduction: Europeanization and the Balkans”, 3–20, in Petrović T. (ed.), Mirroring Europe: Ideas of Europe and Europeanization in Balkan Societies. (Amsterdam: Brill).
Ramet S. P.2006. The Three Yugoslavias. State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Rao H. N. N.2001. My Days with the Film Society Movement: Cinema for the People and People for the Cinema. (Bangalore: Sibina Services).
Said E.1977. Orientalism. (London: Penguin).
Siqrd. “History of Gay and Lesbian Movement in Slovenia”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/history> (accessed on 9 August 2014).
Šarić Lj. 2010. “Domestic and foreign media images of the Balkans”, 51–73, in Šarić Lj. et al., Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim. (Bristol: Multilingual Matters).
Španjol I. 2004. “Dvajset let nemogočih fantazij: 20. Festival lezbicnega in gejevskega filma”, <http://www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/20/20letf.php> (accessed on 30 November 2012).
Španjol I. 2005. “Documents of opression”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/21/documents.php> (accessed on 1 December 2012).
Španjol I. 2007. “Go East”, <http://www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/23/katalog.pdf> (accessed on 3 December 2012).
Todorova M.2005. “The trap of backwardness: Modernity, temporality, and the study of Eastern European nationalism”, Slavic Review, 64 (1): 140–165.
Todorova M.2009. Imagining the Balkans. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Torino glbt Film Festival. 2010. “Le novità per il 25. del tglbt Festival”, <www.cinemagay.it/news-red.asp?idrassegna=16343> (accessed on 19 August 2014).
Torino glbt Film Festival. 2012. “27 Torino glbt Film Festival”, <www.lgbtsupports.org/torino-glbt-film-festival> (accessed on 23 February 2013).
Tratnik S. 2006. “Od Harlemske renesanse in evropskih elektrosokov do azilov, migrant/k in indijske melodrame o aidsu”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/22/uvod.php> (accessed on 2 December 2012).
Velikonja N. 2003. “20 Festival Years. Festival of lesbian and gay film in Ljubljana”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/20/20let.php> (accessed on 7 April 2012).
Velikonja N. 2004. “Proti odtujitvi pogleda”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/20/proti.php> (accessed on 29 November 2012).
Velikonja N. 2008. “Taljenje vsak dan novega ledu”, <www.ljudmila.org/siqrd/fglf/24/katalog.pdf> (accessed on 4 December 2012).
Weiss A.1995. Paris Was a Woman: Portraits From the Left Bank. (London: Rivers Oram Press).
Since the winter of 2010, there have already been four other editions of the Ljubljana fglf. Moreover, there is a new lesbian multimedia festival in Ljubljana since 2012 – "Lesbian neighbourhood/Lezbična četrt". For my PhD research, I did fieldwork at the Ljubljana festival, and one Zagreb festival – Queer Zagreb. Yet, I ended up focusing on the Zagreb festival, and used the insights about the Ljubljana festival only to analyze the complex network of post-Yugoslav queer festivals. This paper is my attempt to discuss the practices and views of the Ljubljana festival community, at least in part.
Jalušić (1999) explains that the first feminist groups started "simultaneously with the so-called new social movement groups that were active under the umbrella of the Socialist Youth Organization" (113). The first lg groups started in the same way within the škuc as the umbrella organization: the gay group Magnus in 1984, and the ll as the lesbian group within the feminist group Lilit (within škuc) in 1987, becoming an independent "section" in 1988 – the today’s škuc-ll.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 607 | 124 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 254 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 8 | 0 |
This paper draws upon my fieldwork at the Festival of Gay and Lesbian Film in Ljubljana to examine how “Europeanness” is used to ground the legitimacy of minoritarian organizations, but also to question the assumptions implicit in such claims to belonging. I argue that the discourse of Europeanness is used in similarly ambivalent ways in both Slovenian lgbt activism and official Slovenian politics: for political and institutional legitimization that also performs a distancing from the post-Yugoslav region. This discursive distancing serves to hide the constant processes of negotiation of belonging within the eu as well as ongoing practical cooperation and communication within the post-Yugoslav region. Attention to such strategic tensions opens up a possibility of formulating a critique of the discourse that posits Europeanization as the only possible future for the region and Europe as an imagined space of tolerance for minorities.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 607 | 124 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 254 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 8 | 0 |