From Post-Communism to Post-Democracy
The Visible and Invisible Political Transformations
In: Southeastern EuropeThe analysis starts from a key question: how many transformations did post-communism, which came as a promise and project for one transformation, actually carry out? This article is a conceptual, not an event narrative about the transformations of democratization. Its theoretical ambition is threefold. The first aim is to develop a new analytical model for the study of transformations based on the concept of ‘symbolic-ideological hegemony’ and a matrix of two pairs of indicators. The first pair reflects the intentionality of the change and examines the (non-)existence of an explicitly formulated political project as well as its (self-)designation by elites and citizens. The second pair of indicators concerns agency and covers the supply side and the demand side, the perspective and role of elites, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the perspective and role of citizens. The other ambitions of the study are to identify the key transformations in Bulgaria’s three-decade-long post-communist development – a democratic, a (national) populist, and a post-democratic one, and to analyze them in a comparative perspective.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Avramov, K. 2015. “The Bulgarian Radical Right: marching up from the margins,” in: Minkenberg, M. (ed.) Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process (New York: Routledge).
-
Badzhakov, M. 2007. “Elementi na fasadnata demoktrat͡sii͡a – obrecheni li sa Bŭlgarii͡a i Balkanite na nei͡a?” [Elements of façade demoracy – are Bulgaria and the Balkans doomed to it?], in N. Bogomilova and N. Dimitrova (eds.), Balkanskata kulturna matrit͡sa i evropeĭskii͡at proekt [The Balkan cultural matrix and the European project] (Sofia: Faber): 64–104.
-
Bermeo N. 2016. “On democratic backsliding”, Journal of Democracy, vol.27, N 1: 5–19.
-
Beyme, K. von . 2015. “Transforming Transformation Theory,” in M. Minkenberg (ed.), Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process (New York: Routledge): 13–26.
-
Crawford В. and A. Lijphart . 1995. “Explaining Political and Economic Change in Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Old Legacies, New Institutions, Hegemonic Norms, and International Pressures,” Comparative Political Studies 28: 171–199.
-
Crouch, C. 2004. Post-Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
-
Dahl, R. A. 1992. “The Problem of Civic Competence,” Journal of Democracy 3 (4): 45–59.
-
Dahrendorf, R. 1990. Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: In a Letter Intended to Have Been Sent to a Gentleman in Warsaw (London: Chatto and Windus).
-
Dnevnik. 25 April 2018. “Bŭlgarii͡a e pŭrva v es po di͡al na horata v tezhki materialni lishenii͡a” [Bulgaria ranks first in EU by share of people in severe material deprivation]. https://www.dnevnik.bg/evropa/2018/04/25/3168774_bulgariia_e_purva_v_es_po_dial_na_horata_v_tejki/ .
-
Dnes. 21 August 2017. 6 dni stroi͡at, 7 dni sŭbari͡at mavzolei͡a na Georgi Dimitrov [Georgi Dimitrov’s mausoleum takes 6 days to build, 7 days to demolish]. https://dnes.dir.bg/obshtestvo/mavzoley-georgi-dimitrov-26235961 .
-
Economic Research Institute at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences . 2016. Annual Report 2016. Economic Development and Policies in Bulgaria: Evaluations and Prospects (Sofia: Gorex Press). https://www.iki.bas.bg/files/Doklad_2016_EN.pdf.
-
Elster, J. 1991. “The Necessity and Impossibility of Simultaneous Political and Economic Reforms,” in: P. Ploszajski (ed.), Philosophy of Social Choice (Warsaw: IFiS Publishers): 309–16.
-
Eurostat . 2019. Inequality of Income Distribution. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tespm151/default/table?lang=en.
-
Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man (New York: The Free Press).
-
Ganev, V. I. 2007. Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria after 1989 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
-
Ghodsee, K. 2008. “Left Wing, Right Wing, Everything: Xenophobia, Neo-Totalitarianism and Populist Politics in Bulgaria,” Problems of Post-Communism 56 (3): 26–39.
-
Gurov, B. and E. Zankina . 2013. “Populism and the Construction of Political Charisma. Post-transition Politics in Bulgaria,” Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 60, N1, 3–17.
-
Hellman, J. , G. Jones and D. Kaufmann . 2000. Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption, and Influence in Transition Economies, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444 (Washington, DC). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=240555.
-
Hulsey, J. 2018. “Institutions and the Reversal of State Capture: Bosnia and Herzegovina in Comparative Perspective,” Southeastern Europe 42 (1): 15–32.
-
Huntington, S. P. 1991. “Democracy’s Third Wave,” Journal of Democracy 2 (2): 12–34. https://www.ned.org/docs/Samuel-P-Huntington-Democracy-Third-Wave.pdf.
-
Infostat (National Statistical Institute). https://infostat.nsi.bg/infostat/pages/reports/query.jsf?x_2=795 .
-
Isin, E. F. and G. M. Nielsen (eds.). 2008. Acts of Citizenship (London and New York: Zed Books).
-
Isin, E. and P. Nyers . 2014. “Introduction: Globalizing Citizenship Studies,” in E. Isin and P. Nyers (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (London and New York: Routledge): 1–11.
-
Kanev, D. 1995. “Za perspektivite na konsolidat͡sii͡a na demoktrat͡sii͡ata” [On the prospects of consolidation of democracy], Politicheski izsledvanii͡a [Political Studies] 3: 237–43.
-
Kanev, D. and A. Todorov (eds.). 2014. Kachestvo na demoktrat͡sii͡ata v Bŭlgarii͡a [Quality of democracy in Bulgaria] (Sofia: Iztok-Zapad).
-
Kornai, J. 2006. “The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe: Success and Disappointment,” Economics of Transition 14 (2): 207–44.
-
Krasteva, A. 2014. “Grazhdanski protesti, e-demoktrat͡sii͡a, novi mobilizat͡sii” [Civic protests, e-democracy, new mobilizations], in D. Kanev and A. Todorov (eds.), Kachestvo na demoktrat͡sii͡ata v Bŭlgarii͡a [Quality of democracy in Bulgaria] (Sofia: Iztok-Zapad): 449–92.
-
Krasteva, A. 2016a. “Re/De/Constructing Far-Right Youth: Between the Lost Generation and Contestatory Citizenship,” in G. Lazaridis and G. Campani (eds.), Understanding the Populist Shift: Othering in a Europe in Crisis (London and New York: Routledge): 150–78.
-
Krasteva, A. 2016b. “Occupy Bulgaria: Or, the Emergence of the Post-Communist Contestatory Citizenship,” Southeastern Europe 40 (2): 158–87.
-
Krasteva, A. 2016c. “The Post-Communist Rise of National Populism: Bulgarian Paradoxes,” in G. Lazaridis , G. Campani and A. Benveniste (eds.), The Rise of the Far Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’ (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan): 161–200.
-
Krasteva, A. 2019a. “Post-Democratic Crisis and Political Leadership. From Crisis Management to Crisis Creation,” in S. Salvatore et al. (eds.), Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis: The Future of European Societies (Cham: Springer): 3–23.
-
Krasteva, A. 2019b. “Ot postkomunizŭm kŭm postdemokrat͡sii͡a” [From postcommunism to postdemocracy], in G. Fotev (ed.), Evropeĭskite t͡sennosti: novata konstelat͡sii͡a [European values: the new constellation] (Sofia: New Bulgarian University): 161–177.
-
Krasteva, A. 2019d. Hyperpoliticisation of asylum and responsibility The Bulgarian case: from polarization to hegemonisation. 2019. issn 2627–339X http://ceaseval.eu/publications/15_Krasteva_WP5_Bulgaria.pdf.
-
Krasteva, A. (ed.). 2013. E-citoyennetés (Paris: Harmattan).
-
Krasteva, A. , Saarinen A. , Siim B. 2019. “Citizens activism for reimagining and reinventing citizenship countering far-right populism,” in B. Siim , A. Krasteva and Aino Saarinen (eds.), Citizens’ Activism and Solidarity Movements: Contending with Populism. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan): 213–241.
-
Krasteva A. and A. Todorov . 2011. “Ethnic Minorities and Political Representation: The Case of Bulgaria,” Southeastern Europe 35 (1): 8–38.
-
Levinas, E. 1947. De l’existence à l’existant (Paris: Fontaine).
-
Levitsky A. and L Way . 2010. Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the Cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Machiavelli, N. 1998. The Prince. 2nd ed. (trans. Harvey C. Mansfield ; Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press [Italian original, 1532]).
-
Magnette, P. 1999. La citoyenneté européenne (Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles).
-
Michels, R. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: The Free Press).
-
Minchev, O. 2016. “Ideĭno-politicheski kontekst na prehoda sled komunizma” [Conceptual and political context of the post-communist transition], Politicheski izsledvanii͡a [Political Studies] 1–2: 22–37.
-
Minkеnberg, M. 2015. “Profiles, Patterns, Process: Studying the East European Radical Right in Its Political Environment,” in M. Minkenberg (ed.), Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process (New York: Routledge): 27–56.
-
Minkenberg, M. (ed.). 2015. Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process (New York: Routledge).
-
Minkov, Zh. 2014. “Sot͡sialni neravenstva, kachestvo i legitimnost na demoktrat͡sii͡ata” [Social inequalities, quality and legitimacy of democracy], in D. Kanev and A. Todorov (eds.), Kachestvo na demoktrat͡sii͡ata v Bŭlgarii͡a [Quality of democracy in Bulgaria] (Sofia: Iztok-Zapad): 539–72.
-
Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-
Mudde C. and C. R. Kaltwasser . 2013. “Populism,” in M. Freeden , L. T. Sargent and M. Stears (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 493–512.
-
Offe, C. 1994. “Das Dilemma der Gleichzeitigkeit. Demokratisierung, Marktwirtschaft und Territorialpolitik in Osteuropa,” in C. Offe , Der Tunnel am Ende des Lichts (Frankfurt: Campus): 57–80.
-
Pajnik, M. and B. Sauer (eds). 2018. Populism and the Web. Communicative Practices of Parties and Movements in Europe (London and New York: Routledge).
-
Perry, V. and S. Keil . 2018. “The Business of State Capture in the Western Balkans: An Introduction,” Southeastern Europe 42 (1): 1–14.
-
Power, T. J. and M. M. Taylor . 2011. “Introduction: Accountability Institutions and Political Corruption in Brazil,” in T. J. Power and M. M. Taylor (eds.), Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press): 1–28.
-
Reporters Without Borders . 2019. Bulgaria. https://rsf.org/en/bulgaria.
-
Sauer, B. , Krasteva, A. and A. Saarinen . 2018. “Post-democracy, Party Politics and Right-wing Populist Communication,” in Pajnik, M. and B. Sauer (eds). 2018. Populism and the Web. Communicative Practices of Parties and Movements in Europe (London and New York: Routledge), 14–53.
-
Sabo, M. 1995. “Institut͡sionaliziraneto na ‘nauka za demoktrat͡sii͡ata’ v prot͡sesa na demoktratizat͡sii͡a” [The institutionalization of a “science of democracy” in the process of democratization], Politicheski izsledvanii͡a [Political Studies] 1: 100–107.
-
Schmitter, P. C. 1994. “Dangers and Dilemmas of Democracy,” Journal of Democracy 5 (2): 57–74.
-
Segert, D. 2009. “Dilemi na ednovremennata transformat͡sii͡a na politikata i ikonomikata v Iztochno-T͡Sentralna Evropa mezhdu 1989 i 2008 g.” [Dilemmas of the simultaneous transformation of politics and the economy in East-Central Europe between 1989 and 2008], Politicheski izsledvanii͡a [Political Studies] 1–2: 3–15.
-
Shorrocks, A. , J. Davies and R. Lluberas . 2018. Global Wealth Report 2018 (Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute).
-
Stoĭchev, S. 2017. Kontroliranii͡at i kupen vot kato instrument za zavladi͡avane na dŭrzhavata ot organizirani prestŭpni mrezhi: politicheski riskove i tendendt͡sii [Controlled and bought votes as an instrument for state capture by organized crime networks: political risks and tendencies] (Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press).
-
Tilly, C. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making,” in C. Tilly (ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press): 3–83.
-
Todorov, A. 2011. Bulgarian Political Culture and Civic Participation (Sofia: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Office Bulgaria).
-
Todorov, A. 2012. The Extreme Right Wing in Bulgaria (Sofia: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Office Bulgaria).
-
Todorov, A. 2015. “Chapitre 4: La Bulgarie,” in N. Brack , J.-M. De Waele and J.-B. Pilet (eds.), Les démocraties européennes: Institutions, élections et partis politiques. 3rd ed. (Paris: Armand Colin): 61–77.
-
Todorov, A. 2018. “Bulgaria: The Failed Party System Institutionalization,” in M. Lisi (ed.), Party System Change, the European Crisis and the State of Democracy. Routledge Studies on Political Parties and Party Systems (Abingdon and New York: Routledge): 46–62.
-
Transparency International . 2018. Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/corruption_perceptions_index_2018.
-
World Press Freedom Index 2019. https://rsf.org/en/ranking#.
-
Zankina, E. 2016. “Theorizing the New Populism in Eastern Europe. A look at Bulgaria,” in Czech Journal of Political Science, 2, 182–199.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 786 | 130 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 18 | 0 |
From Post-Communism to Post-Democracy
The Visible and Invisible Political Transformations
In: Southeastern EuropeThe analysis starts from a key question: how many transformations did post-communism, which came as a promise and project for one transformation, actually carry out? This article is a conceptual, not an event narrative about the transformations of democratization. Its theoretical ambition is threefold. The first aim is to develop a new analytical model for the study of transformations based on the concept of ‘symbolic-ideological hegemony’ and a matrix of two pairs of indicators. The first pair reflects the intentionality of the change and examines the (non-)existence of an explicitly formulated political project as well as its (self-)designation by elites and citizens. The second pair of indicators concerns agency and covers the supply side and the demand side, the perspective and role of elites, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the perspective and role of citizens. The other ambitions of the study are to identify the key transformations in Bulgaria’s three-decade-long post-communist development – a democratic, a (national) populist, and a post-democratic one, and to analyze them in a comparative perspective.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 786 | 130 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 18 | 0 |