Studies have identified variables that influence ngo objectives, organizational structures and activities, often related to the broader socio-economic context. Among the most important are the availability of funding and the density of networks. Both factors affect ngo s by driving them either to adjust priorities and widen or limit their operations and/or to become more or less extrovert. This article aims to assess whether, how and to what extent the recent refugee crisis has impacted the Greek ngo ecosystem in terms of scope of activities, professionalization, organizational structures and transnational networking. Available funding, mostly from European institutions, has suddenly and spectacularly increased while International ngo s (ingo s) established operations to Greece – some cooperating with local partners. Likewise, several Greek ngo s (gngo s) embarked on a process of significant operational expansion, mostly ‘in the field’ and as part of an ‘emergency response’. Also, a series of grassroots organizations have been created – mainly at the local level. Based on a series of interviews with executives of the most recognizable gngo s, funders and policymakers and a survey based on questionnaires, the authors argue that the impact was both positive and negative and varied extensively depending on the size and type of organization under focus.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ahmad, M.M. 2006. “The ‘partnership’ between international ngo s (non‐governmental organizations) and local ngo s in Bangladesh,” Journal of International Development 18: 629–638.
Bulut, T. 2009. “Transnational Governance of Labour Standards: Insights from the Clothing Industry in Turkey,” in L. Bruszt, and R. Holzhacker (ed.), The Transnationalization of Economies, States and Civil Societies (New York: Springer): 263–284.
Chtouris, S., and D. S. Miller 2017. “Refugee flows and volunteers in the current humanitarian crisis in Greece,” Journal of Applied Security Research 12: 61–77.
Clarke, J., A. Huliaras, & D. Sotiropoulos 2015. Austerity and the Third Sector in Greece: Civil Society at the European Frontline (1st ed.) (London: Routledge).
DeMars, W. 2005. NGOs and Transnational Networks: Wild Cards in World Politics (London: Pluto Press).
Devaney, B. 2015. Why are ngo s so reluctant to help Greece? New Internationalist. Retrieved July 3, 2018 from https://newint.org/features/web-exclusive/2015/07/21/greece-aid-lesvos.
Dianeosis (2016). The Refugee issue and the Greeks. Retrieved June 25, 2018 from https://www.dianeosis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/immigration_04.pdf
Diani, M. 2015. The Cement of Civil Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ebers, M. (ed.). 1997. The Formation of Interorganizational Networks (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Elbers, W., and L. Schulpen 2013. “Corridors of power: The institutional design of north–south ngo partnerships,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 24: 48–67.
Eurobarometer. 2013. Europeans’ Engagement in Participatory Democracy, Flash Eurobarometer No 373.
European Commission. 2018. Managing Migration – EU Financial Support to Greece. Retrieved July 3, 2018 from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20180404-managing-migration-eu-financial-support-to-greece_en.pdf.
Evangelinidis, A. 2016. “The Greek State’s Response to the Refugee Crisis and the Solidarity Movement,” Contemporary Southeastern Europe Event Analyses 3(1): 32–36.
Gulati, R. 1995. “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619–52.
Guribye, E., and T. S. Mydland 2018. “Escape to the island: International volunteer engagement on Lesvos during the refugee crisis,” Journal of Civil Society 14: 346–363.
Hangartner, D., E Dinas, M. Marbach, K. Matakos, & D. Xefteris 2019. “Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?,” American Political Science Review 113: 442–455.
Huliaras, A. 2015. “Greek civil society: The neglected causes of weakness,” in J. Clarke, A. Huliaras, and D. A. Sotiropoulos (ed.), Austerity and the third sector in Greece (London: Ashgate): 9–28.
Huliaras, A. 2020. “Civil Society”, in K. Featherstone and D. A. Sotiropoulos (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Greek Politics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 351–65.
Huliaras, A., and S. Petropoulos 2016. “The law of unintended consequences: Greek civil society and EU structural funds,” in P. Liargovas, S. Petropoulos, N. Tzifakis, and A. Huliaras (ed.), Beyond ‘absorption’: The impact of EU structural funds on Greece (Berlin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and Hellenic University Association for European Studies): 109–116.
Jalali, R. 2008. “International funding of ngo s in India: Bringing the state back in,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and nonprofit organisations 19: 161–188.
Joint Agency Briefing Paper. 2017. Transitioning to a Government-run refugee and migrant response in Greece – A joint ngo roadmap for more fair and humane policies. Retrieved July 2, 2018 from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/greece_roadmap_oxfam_final.pdf.
Jones, C., W. Hesterly, and S. Borgatti 1997. “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Journal 22: 911–45.
Jones, N., M. Proikaki and S. Roumeliotis 2015. “Social Capital Levels in Times of Crisis,” in Clarke J., A. Huliaras and D. Sotiropoulos (ed.). Austerity and the Third Sector in Greece: Civil Society at the European Frontline (London and NY: Routledge): 29–45.
Kapucu, N. 2005. “Interorganizational Coordination in Dynamic Context: Networks in Emergency Response Management,” Connections 26: 9–10.
Kathimerini. I. 2019. “I Elliniki Peripeteia enos Prostati ton Xerizomenon,” 22 December.
Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (New York: Cornell University Press).
Kitching, G., H. Haavik, B. Tandstad, M. Zaman and E. Darj 2016. “Exploring the Role of Ad Hoc Grassroots Organizations Providing Humanitarian Aid on Lesvos,” PloSCurrents 17:8.
Legg, K.R. and J.M. Roberts 1997. Modern Greece: A Civilization on the Periphery (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
Lehner, R. 2019. “The EU-Turkey‐‘deal’: Legal Challenges and Pitfalls,” International Migration 57: 176–185.
Lewis, D. 1998. “Development ngo s and the challenge of partnership: changing relations between North and South,” Social policy & administration 32: 501–512.
Meaker, M. 2015. “Greek refugee crisis: ‘We need coordinated action,’” The Guardian. Retrieved July 16, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/nov/04/greek-refugee-crisis-we-need-coordinated-action.
Mpourdaras, G. 2016. Mouzalas: “‘We didn’t succeed’ – Great amounts of funds from the EU go to ngo s, without any control from Athens,” Kathimerini. Retrieved June 30, 2018 from http://www.kathimerini.gr/867947/article/epikairothta/politikh/moyzalas-den-ta-kataferame---se-mko-kai-xwris-elegxo-apo-thn-a8hna-terastia-posa-ths-ee-gia-to-prosfygiko.
MSF, 17 June 2016, Press release. Retrieved July 15, 2018 from https://www.msf.org/eu-states%E2%80%99-dangerous-approach-migration-places-asylum-jeopardy-worldwide
Murray, D. 2017. The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam (London: Bloomsbury Continuum).
Nonaka, I. 1991. “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review 69: 96–104.
Petropoulos, S., and A. Valvis 2015. “Crisis and Transition of ngo s in Europe: The Case of Greece” in Katsikides S., & Koktsides P., (ed.). Societies in Transition (Heidelberg/New York/Dodrecht: Springer): 159–187.
Salgado, R. S. 2010. “ngo Structural Adaptation to Funding Requirements and Prospects for Democracy: The Case of the European Union,” Global Society 24: 507–527.
Salgado, R. S. 2014. “Rebalancing EU Interest Representation? Associative Democracy and EU Funding of Civil Society Organizations,” The Journal of Common Market Studies 52:337–353.
Sheth, D.L. and H. Sethi 1991. “The ngo sector in India: historical context and current discourse,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations 2: 49–68.
Simiti, M. 2015. ‘Social Need’ or ‘Choice’? Greek Civil Society during the Economic Crisis’, Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe. No.95. Retrieved June 18, 2018 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64665/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Hellenic%20Observatory%20%28inc.%20GreeSE%20Papers%29_GreeSE%20Papers_GreeSE-No95.pdf.
Simiti, M. 2017. “Civil Society and the Economy: Greek Civil Society During the Economic Crisis”, Journal of Civil Society 13(4): 357–373.
Skleparis, D. 2015. “Towards a hybrid ‘shadow state’? The case of migrant-refugee serving ngo s” in Clark J., Huliaras A., and Sotiropoulos D., (ed.) Austerity and the Third Sector in Greece: Civil Society at the European Frontline, (Farnham:Ashgate/Gower): 147–165.
Skleparis, D. and I. Armakolas 2016. “The refugee crisis and the role of ngo s, civil society, and media in Greece,” in: Phillips D. L., (ed.) Balkan Human Corridor: Essays on the Refugee and Migrant Crisis from Scholars and Opinion Leaders in Southeast Europe. Institute for the Study of Human Rights (ishr) (New York: Columbia University): 171–184.
Smith, J. 1997. “Characteristics of the modern transnational social movement sector,” in J. Smith, C. Chatfield & R. Pagnucco (ed.), Transnational social movements and global politics: Solidarity beyond the state (Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press): 42–58.
Sotiropoulos, D.A. and D. Bourikos 2014. “Economic Crisis, Social Solidarity and the Voluntary Sector in Greece”. Journal of Power, Politics and Governance 2: 33–53.
Sotiropoulos, D. A., and E. Karamagioli 2006. Greek civil society: The long road to maturity. civicus—Civil Society Index Shortened Assessment Tool, Report for the Case of Greece.
Stewart, J. A. 2016. “Understanding nonprofit professionalisation: Common concepts and new directions for research,” Retrieved August 11, 2018 from http://socialimpactstrategy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Stewart.pdf.
Takahashi, L. and G. Smutny 2002. “Collaborative Windows and Organisational Governance: Exploring the Formation and Demise of Social Service Partnerships,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31: 165–185.
Theocharis, Y. 2011. “Young people, political participation and online postmaterialism in Greece”, New Media & Society 13(2): 203–223.
Tzifakis, N. and A. Huliaras 2013. “Hegemonic Relationships: Donor Countries and ngo s in Western Balkan Post-Conflict Reconstruction,” Southeastern Europe 37: 312–329.
Tzifakis, N., S., Petropoulos, and A. Huliaras 2017. “The Impact of Economic Crises on ngo s: The Case of Greece,” Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations 28: 1390–405.
unhcr. May 2018. factsheet – Greece. Retrieved June 12, 2018 from https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/64032.
Vakil, A. (1997). “Confronting the classification problem: toward a taxonomy of ngo s”, World Development 25 (12): 2057–71.
Valvis, A. 2014. “Greek Media the Vigilante of the ngo Sector,” ELIAMEP Working Paper 56.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1155 | 228 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 107 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 202 | 41 | 2 |
Studies have identified variables that influence ngo objectives, organizational structures and activities, often related to the broader socio-economic context. Among the most important are the availability of funding and the density of networks. Both factors affect ngo s by driving them either to adjust priorities and widen or limit their operations and/or to become more or less extrovert. This article aims to assess whether, how and to what extent the recent refugee crisis has impacted the Greek ngo ecosystem in terms of scope of activities, professionalization, organizational structures and transnational networking. Available funding, mostly from European institutions, has suddenly and spectacularly increased while International ngo s (ingo s) established operations to Greece – some cooperating with local partners. Likewise, several Greek ngo s (gngo s) embarked on a process of significant operational expansion, mostly ‘in the field’ and as part of an ‘emergency response’. Also, a series of grassroots organizations have been created – mainly at the local level. Based on a series of interviews with executives of the most recognizable gngo s, funders and policymakers and a survey based on questionnaires, the authors argue that the impact was both positive and negative and varied extensively depending on the size and type of organization under focus.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1155 | 228 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 107 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 202 | 41 | 2 |