Parliamentary oversight and control of intelligence and security services is complex, in theory as well as in practice. Because of the secrecy that surrounds their work, parliamentary control is essentially difficult. In this article the Dutch experiences in institutionalizing and practising oversight are explored. It will become clear that factors such as the structural makeup of the parliamentary committee for oversight, political culture, and the personal views of the Members of Parliament involved, decide to a large degree how often the committee convenes, what the atmosphere of the meetings is like, and what issues are on the table.
B.G.J. de Graaff‘De 'intelligence revolution' van de 20e eeuw en haar geschiedschrijving: een bibliografisch artikel’De Nieuwste Tijd. Contactblad van de Vereniging voor de Geschiedenis van de Twintigste Eeuwno. 6 6 June 1996 pp. 5-16 at pp. 5-6.
A. Wills et al.‘Parliamentary oversight of security and intelligence agencies in the European Union’Report for the European Union Directorate for Internal Policies: Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (Civil liberties Justice and Home Affairs)(Brussels 2011) 93.