Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ibid., p. 299.
See Paul E. Chevedden, “Black Camels and Blazing Bolts: The Bolt-Projecting Trebuchet in the Mamluk Army,” Mamluk Studies Review 8.1 (2004), pp. 227-77, at p. 235 n. 12.
Ibid., p. 243 n. 28.
See Little, Introduction to Mamlūk Historiography, pp. 87-92; idem, “The Fall of ʿAkkā,” p. 161.
Ibn al-Furāt, ed. Zurayq, p. 112. Little has suggested that Ibn al-Furāt borrowed much of his information from the work of al-Nuwayrī, Little, Introduction to Mamlūk Historiography, pp. 73-75; idem, “The Fall of ʿAkkā,” p. 161. In this instance, however, he seems to have drawn directly from al-Jazarī’s account. Alternatively, if al-Nuwayrī also based his description on that of al-Jazarī, it is possible that Ibn al-Furāt, knowing this, referred to al-Jazarī although he was reading from al-Nuwayrī’s account.
Templar of Tyre, ed. Minervini, p. 489, 491, 206, pp. 208-210; letter of John of Villiers to William of Villaret, ed. Delaville le Roulx, no. 4157, 3:593; Thadeus, Ystoria de desolatione et conculcatione civitatis Acconensis et tocius terre sancte, in The Fall of Acre 1291, ed. R. B. C. Huygens (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004), ll. 48-60, p. 101; Marino Sanudo, ed. Bongars, 3.12.21, p. 230; Chronique d’Amadi, ed. De Mas Latrie, p. 220; Ludolph of Suchem 26, ed. Deycks, p. 43; Andreas D’Souza, “The Conquest of ʿAkka (690/1291): A Comparative Analysis of Christian and Muslim Sources,” The Muslim World 80 (1990), pp. 234-50, at p. 241.
For more, see D’Souza, “The Conquest of ʿAkka,” pp. 243-44; Little, “The Fall of ʿAkkā,” pp. 172-73.
Ibn al-Furāt, ed. Zurayq, p. 136.
See Fulton, “Artillery in and around the Latin East,” pp. 32-40, 182-92; idem “Development of Prefabricated Artillery during the Crusades,” Journal of Medieval Military History 13 (2015), pp. 51-72.
Christopher Marshall, Warfare in the Latin East, 1192-1291, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 214, 234.
Templar of Tyre, trans. Crawford, p. 100 n. 4.
Chevedden, “Black Camels,” pp. 251-54. See also Chevedden, “The Artillery of King James I,” pp. 61-63; idem, “The Invention of the Counterweight Trebuchet,” pp. 106-7. Cf. al-Zardkāsh, ms Ahmad iii 3469.
Chevedden, “Black Camels,” pp. 235-38. Cf. Hindī, al-Anīq fī al-manājanīq, pp. 26-27, 94, 96.
Chevedden, “Black Camels,” pp. 251-52. The pole-framed counterweight trebuchet is frequently referred to as a bricola in the West.
See Fulton, “Artillery in and around the Latin East,” pp. 44-45, 50-59.
See Fulton, “Artillery in and around the Latin East,” pp. 368-72.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 243 | 28 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 187 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 8 | 0 |
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 243 | 28 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 187 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 8 | 0 |