The heavily Neoplatonic and antiquarian-perennialist tenor of Safavid philosophy is now widely recognized by specialists; but few have acknowledged its equally notable Neopythagorean turn. Likewise, that the primary mode of applied Neoplatonic-Neopythagorean philosophy as a Safavid imperial way of life was occult science has been ignored altogether, making impossible a history of its practice. The case of the Twelver Shiʿi sage-mage Mīr Dāmād – famed down to the present as an occult scientist – is here especially illustrative: for he was largely responsible for this Neopythagoreanization of Safavid philosophy, which saw the remarkable transmogrification of Ibn Sīnā himself into a Neopythagorean-occultist, by his espousal of a peculiarly Mamluk-Timurid-Aqquyunlu brand of philosophical lettrism (ʿilm al-ḥurūf) in at least three of his many works. The example of this imperial Neopythagoreanizing lettrist is thus crucial for understanding the intellectual and religiopolitical continuity of Safavid Shiʿi culture with Sunni precedent, as well as contemporary Persianate and Latinate parallels. Within Western history of science more broadly, Mīr Dāmād and the host of his fellow Muslim kabbalists must now be restored to the master mathesis narrative whereby scientific modernity is but the upshot of early modern Western philosophers’ penchant for reading the world as a mathematical text.
Les ténors néoplatoniciens et pérennialistes antiquaires de la philosophie safavide sont aujourd’hui largement reconnu par les spécialistes ; mais peu ont admis son tournant néopythagoricien tout aussi remarquable. De même que le mode principal de la philosophie néoplatonicienne-néopythagoricienne, en tant que mode de vie impérial safavide, soit la science occulte a été complètement ignoré, rendant impossible une histoire de sa pratique. Le cas du sage-mage shiʿite duodécimain Mīr Dāmād – connu jusqu’à présent comme un scientifique occulte – est ici particulièrement illustratif, car il est en grande partie responsable de cette néopythagorisation de la philosophie safavide – qui est allée jusqu’à la transmogrification d’Ibn Sīnā lui-même en occultiste néopythagoricien – par son adhésion à une marque particulière de lettrisme philosophique mamelouk-timouride-aqquyunlu (ʿilm al-ḥurūf) dans au moins trois de ses nombreuses œuvres. L’exemple de ce lettriste néopythagoricien impérial est donc crucial pour comprendre la continuité intellectuelle et religio-politique de la culture shiʿite safavide avec un précédent sunnite, ainsi que les parallèles persans et latins contemporains. De façon plus générale, Mīr Dāmād et le noyau de ses confrères kabbalistes musulmans doivent maintenant être restitués au récit de la mathesis qui a fait que la modernité scientifique n’est rien d’autre que le résultat du penchant des premiers philosophes occidentaux modernes à lire le monde comme un texte mathématique.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adamson, Peter. The Arabic Plotinus: A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle. London: Duckworth, 2002.
ʿAlawī, Mīr Sayyid Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-Qabasāt, edited by Ḥāmid Nājī Iṣfahānī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1376 Sh./1997.
Albertson, David. Mathematical Theologies: Nicholas of Cusa and the Legacy of Thierry of Chartres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
al-ʿĀmilī, Bahāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad. Al-Kashkūl. 3 vols. Beirut: al-Aʿlamī, 1403/1983.
ʿĀmilī Qazwīnī, Muḥammad Shafīʿ Ḥusaynī. Maḥāfil al-muʾminīn fī dhayl Majālis al-muʾminīn, edited by Ibrāhīm ʿArabpūr and Manṣūr Jaghatāʾī. Mashhad: Bunyād-i Pazhūhish-hā-yi Islāmī, 1383 Sh./2004.
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali. The Divine Guide in Early Shi‘ism: The Sources of Esotericism in Islam, translated by David Streight. Albany: suny Press, 1994.
Āmulī, Ḥasan Ḥasanzāda. Hizār u yak kalima. Qom: Būstān-i Kitāb, 1380 Sh./2001.
Awjabī, ʿAlī. Mīr Dāmād. Tehran: Kitābkhāna-yi Mūza u Markaz-i Asnād-i Majlis-i Shūrā-yi Islāmī, 1389 Sh./2010.
Babayan, Kathryn. “The Cosmological Order of Things in Early Modern Safavid Iran.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens, edited by Massumeh Farhad and Serpil Bağcı, 345-354. London: Thames & Hudson, 2009.
Babayan, Kathryn. Mystics, Monarchs, and Messiahs: Cultural Landscapes of Early Modern Iran. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Bdaiwi, Ahab. “Shiʿi Defenders of Avicenna: An Intellectual History of the Dashtakī Philosophers of Shiraz.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Exeter, 2014.
Bihbahānī, ʿAlī Mudarris Mūsawī. Ḥakīm-i Astarābād, Mīr Dāmād. Tehran: Iṭṭilaʿāt, 1370 Sh./1991.
Binbaş, İ. Evrim. Intellectual Networks in Timurid Iran: Sharaf al-Dīn ʿAlī Yazdī and the Islamicate Republic of Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Casewit, Yousef. The Mystics of al-Andalus: Ibn Barrajān and Islamic Thought in the Twelfth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Clucas, Stephen. “John Dee’s Angelic Conversations and the Ars Notoria: Renaissance Magic and Mediaeval Theurgy.” In John Dee: Interdisciplinary Studies in English Renaissance Thought, edited by Stephen Clucas, 231-273. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
Cole, Juan R. I. “The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa’i.” Studia Islamica 80 (1994): 145-163.
Corbin, Henry. History of Islamic Philosophy, translated by Liadain Sherrard and Philip Sherrard. London: Kegan Paul, 1993.
Corbin, Henry. La philosophie iranienne islamique aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Buchet/Chastel, 1981.
Corbin, Henry. En islam iranien. Aspects spirituels et philosophiques, 4 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1972.
Dashtakī, Ghiyāth al-Dīn Manṣūr. Kashf al-ḥaqāʾiq al-muḥammadiyya. In Muṣannafāt-i Ghiyāth al-Dīn Manṣūr Ḥusaynī Dashtakī Shīrāzī, edited by ʿAbd Allāh Nūrānī, 2 vols., 2:735-988. Tehran: Anjuman-i Āsār u Mafākhir-i Farhangī, 1386 Sh./2007.
Dashtakī, Ghiyāth al-Dīn Manṣūr. Maṭlaʿ al-ʿirfān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān. In Muṣannafāt-i Ghiyāth al-Dīn Manṣūr Ḥusaynī Dashtakī Shīrāzī, edited by ʿAbd Allāh Nūrānī, 2 vols., 1:297-374. Tehran: Anjuman-i Āsār u Mafākhir-i Farhangī, 1386 Sh./2007.
Dawānī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Tahlīliyya: Sharḥ-i lā ilāh illā Llāh, edited by Firishta Furūzanda. Tehran: Kayhān, 1373 Sh./1994.
Dawānī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Nūr al-hidāya. In Dawānī, Jalāl al-Dīn, al-Rasāʾil al-mukhtāra, edited by Aḥmad Tūysirkānī, 105-128. Isfahan: Kitābkhāna-yi ʿUmūmī-yi Amīr al-Muʾminīn ʿAlī, 1985.
De Smet, Daniel. “Jāʿfar al-Ṣādeq, iv. And Esoteric Sciences.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 2008 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
Di Branco, Marco. “The ‘Perfect King’ and His Philosophers: Politics, Religion and Graeco-Arabic Philosophy in Safavid Iran: The Case of the Uṯūlūǧiyā.” Studia graeco-arabica 4 (2014): 191-218.
Doostdar, Alireza M. “Impossible Occultists: Practice and Participation in an Islamic Tradition.” American Ethnologist 46, no. 2 (2019): 176-189.
Doostdar, Alireza M. The Iranian Metaphysicals: Explorations in Science, Islam, and the Uncanny. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
Dunietz, Alexandra Whelan. The Cosmic Perils of Qadi Ḥusayn Maybudī in Fifteenth-Century Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
Ebstein, Michael. Mysticism and Philosophy in al-Andalus: Ibn Masarra, Ibn al-ʿArabī and the Ismāʿilī Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Endress, Gerhard. “Mathematics and Philosophy in Medieval Islam.” In The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, edited by Jan P. Hogendijk and Abdelhamid I. Sabra, 121-127. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
Endress, Gerhard. “Philosophische Ein-Band-Bibliotheken aus Isfahan.” Oriens 36 (2001): 10-58.
Eshots, Janis. “The Principle of the Systematic Ambiguity of Existence in the Philosophy of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra.” In Proceedings of the Avicenna International Colloquium 1-6 (2009) <http://www.buali.ir/buali_content/media/article/85.pdf>, accessed 5 January 2016.
Fazlıoğlu, İhsan. “Between Reality and Mentality: Fifteenth Century Mathematics and Natural Philosophy Reconsidered.” Nazariyat 1, no. 1 (2014): 1-39.
Fazlıoğlu, İhsan. “İlk Dönem Osmanlı İlim ve Kültür Hayatinda İhvanu’s-Safâ ve Abdurrahman Bistâmî.” Dîvân: İlmî Araştırmalar 1 (1996): 229-240.
Fleischer, Cornell H. “Ancient Wisdom and New Sciences: Prophecies at the Ottoman Court in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens, edited by Massumeh Farhad and Serpil Bağcı, 232-243. London: Thames & Hudson, 2009.
Forshaw, Peter J. “Cabala Chymica or Chemia Cabalistica – Early Modern Alchemists and Cabala.” Ambix 60, no. 4 (2013): 361-389.
Gardiner, Noah D. “The Occultist Encyclopedism of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Bisṭāmī.” Mamlūk Studies Review 20 (2017): 3-38.
Gardiner, Noah D. “Esotericism in a Manuscript Culture: Aḥmad al-Būnī and His Readers through the Mamlūk Period.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 2014.
Gril, Denis. “The Science of Letters.” In Ibn al-ʿArabī, The Meccan Revelations, Vol. 2, edited by Michel Chodkiewicz, translated by Cyrille Chodkiewicz and Denis Gril, 105-219. New York: Pir Press, 2004.
Gruber, Christiane. “The ‘Restored’ Shīʿī muṣḥaf as Divine Guide? The Practice of fāl-i Qurʾān in the Safavid Period.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 2 (2001): 29-55.
Gutas, Dimitri. “Avicenna and After: The Development of Paraphilosophy. A History of Science Approach.” In Islamic Philosophy from the 12th to the 14th Century, edited by Abdelkader Al Ghouz, 19-71. Göttingen: V&R unipress/Bonn University Press, 2018.
Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. 2nd edition. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Hadot, Pierre. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, translated by Michael Chase, edited with an introduction by Arnold I. Davidson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
Herbert, Sir Thomas. Some Years Travels in Divers Parts of Africa, and Asia the Great. Describing More particularly the Empires of Persia and Industan: Interwoven with such remarkable Occurrences as hapned in those parts during these later Times. As also, many other rich and Famous Kingdoms in the Oriental India, with the Isles adjacent. Revised edition. London: R. Everingham, 1677.
Huffmann, Carl. “Pythagoreanism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoreanism (accessed 24 April 2019).
Ibn ʿArabī, Muḥyī l-Dīn. Al-Futūḥāt al-makkiyya. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, n.d.
Ibn Maʿṣūm, Sayyid ʿAlī-Khān. Sulāfat al-ʿaṣr fī maḥāsin ahl al-ʿaṣr [alt.: fī maḥāsin al-shuʿarāʾ bi-kull miṣr], edited by Maḥmūd Khalaf Bādī. 2 vols. Damascus: Dār Kinān, 1430/2009.
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī. Al-Tanqīḥ fī l-manṭiq, edited by Ghulām-Riḍā Yāsīpūr. Tehran: Bunyād-i Ḥikmat-i Islāmī-yi Ṣadrā, 1378 Sh./1999.
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī. Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, edited by M. Shihābī. 3 vols. Tehran, 1375 Sh./1996.
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī. “R. al-Nayrūziyya.” In idem, Tisʿ rasāʾil fī l-ḥikma wa-l-ṭabīʿiyyāt, edited by Ḥasan ʿĀṣī, 92-97. Beirut: Dār Qābis, 1986.
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī (attrib.). Kunūz al-muʿazzimīn, edited by Jalāl al-Dīn Humāʾī. Tehran: Anjuman-i Āsār-i Millī, 1331 Sh./1952.
Ibn Turka, Ṣāʾin al-Dīn ʿAlī. R. Ḥurūf, edited in Melvin-Koushki, “The Quest for a Universal Science,” 463-489.
Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ. Rasāʾil. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, n.d.
Ishkawarī Lāhījī, Quṭb al-Dīn. Laṭāyif al-ḥisāb, edited by Muḥammad Bāqirī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1389 Sh./2010.
Ishkawarī Lāhījī, Quṭb al-Dīn. Maḥbūb al-qulūb fī aḥwāl al-ḥukamāʾ wa-aqwālihim, edited by Ibrāhīm Dībājī and Ḥāmid Ṣidqī. 2 vols. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1382 Sh./2003.
Iskandar Beg Munshī. Tārīkh-i ʿālam-ārā-yi ʿAbbāsī, edited by Īraj Afshār, 2 vols. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr, 1382 Sh./2004.
Izdebska, Anna. “Pythagoreanism in Arabic, Arabic Pythagoreanism: Transformations of a Philosophical Tradition.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw, 2016.
Izdebska, Anna. “The Attitudes of Medieval Arabic Intellectuals towards Pythagorean Philosophy: Different Approaches and Ways of Influence.” In Cultures in Motion: Studies in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods, edited by Adam Izdebski and Damian Jasiński, 25-44. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press, 2014.
Jaʿfariyān, Rasūl. Naqsh-i khāndān-i Karakī dar taʾsīs u tadāwum-i dawlat-i Ṣafawī. Tehran: Nashr-i ʿIlm, 1387 Sh./2008.
Jaʿfariyān, Rasūl. Maqālāt-i tārīkhī. 12 vols. Qom: Dalīl-i Mā, 1382 Sh./2003.
Jahānbakhsh, Jūyā. Muʿallim-i thālith: Zindagīnāma-yi Mīr Dāmād. Tehran: Asāṭīr, 1389 Sh./2010.
Jambet, Christian. La fin de toute chose, suivi de l’Épître du Rassemblement de Mullâ Sadrâ. Paris: Albin Michel, 2017.
Jambet, Christian. Le gouvernement divin. Islam et conception politique du monde. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2016.
Joost-Gaugier, Christiane L. Pythagoras and Renaissance Europe: Finding Heaven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Josephson-Storm, Jason Ā. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Kāshifī, Ḥusayn Wāʿiẓ. Jawāhir al-tafsīr: Tafsīr-i adabī, ʿirfānī, ḥurūfī, shāmil-i muqaddima-ʾī dar ʿulūm-i qurʾānī u tafsīr-i sūra-yi ḥamd, edited by Jawād ʿAbbāsī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1379 Sh./2000.
Kāshifī, Ḥusayn Wāʿiẓ. Asrār-i Qāsimī. Lithograph. Bombay, 1883.
Kāzirūnī, Abū l-Qāsim Anṣārī. Sullam al-samāwāt, edited by ʿAbd Allāh Nūrānī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1386 Sh./2007.
Kelly, Edward F., Adam Crabtree and Paul Marshall, eds. Beyond Physicalism: Toward Reconciliation of Science and Spirituality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
Khafrī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad. Tafsīr āyat al-kursī, edited by Jawād Fāḍil Bakhshāyishī. Āfāq-i Nūr 9 (1388 Sh./2009): 367-393.
Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir. Biḥār al-anwār, edited by Muḥammad Bāqir Maḥmūdī et al. 110 vols. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1403/1983.
Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir. R. Ḥudūd u qiṣāṣ u diyāt, edited by ʿAlī Fāḍil. Qom, [1362 Sh./1983?].
Marx-Wolf, Heidi. “Pythagoras the Theurgist: Porphyry and Iamblichus on the Role of Ritual in the Philosophical Life.” In Religious Competition in the Third Century CE: Jews, Christians, and the Greco-Roman World, edited by Jordan D. Rosenblum, Lily C. Vuong and Nathaniel P. DesRosiers, 32-38. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.
Massé, Henri. Persian Beliefs and Customs. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files, 1954.
Maybudī, Mīr Ḥusayn. Sharḥ-i dīwān-i mansūb bi amīr al-muʾminīn ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib, edited by Ḥasan Raḥmānī and Sayyid Ibrāhīm Ashkshīrīn. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 2000.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Is (Islamic) Occult Science Science?” Theology and Science 18, no. 2 (forthcoming 2020).
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. The Occult Science of Empire in Aqquyunlu-Safavid Iran: Two Shirazi Lettrists and Their Manuals of Magic. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming 2021.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Safavid Twelver Lettrism between Sunnism and Shiʿism, Mysticism and Science: Rajab al-Bursī vs. Maḥmūd Dihdār.” In Shiʿi Intellectual History: The State of the Art and New Perspectives, edited by Ahab Bdaiwi and Sajjad Rizvi, special issue of Global Intellectual History (forthcoming 2020).
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The New Brethren of Purity: Ibn Turka and the Renaissance of Neopythagoreanism in the Early Modern Persian Cosmopolis.” In Companion to the Reception of Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism, edited by Aurélien Robert, Irene Caiazzo and Constantin Macris. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming 2021.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “How to Rule the World: Occult-Scientific Manuals of the Early Modern Persian Cosmopolis.” Journal of Persianate Studies 11, no. 2 (2018): 140-154.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Taḥqīq vs. Taqlīd in the Renaissances of Western Early Modernity.” Philological Encounters 3, no. 1 (2018): 193-249.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Powers of One: The Mathematicalization of the Occult Sciences in the High Persianate Tradition.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 5, no. 1 (2017): 127-199.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “In Defense of Geomancy: Šaraf al-Dīn Yazdī Rebuts Ibn Ḫaldūn’s Critique of the Occult Sciences.” In Islamicate Occultism: New Perspectives, edited by Matthew Melvin-Koushki and Noah Gardiner. Special double issue of Arabica 64, nos. 3-4 (2017): 346-403.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire: New Forms of Religiopolitical Legitimacy.” In The Wiley-Blackwell History of Islam and Islamic Civilization, edited by Armando Salvatore, Roberto Tottoli and Babak Rahimi, 353-375. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Maḥmud Dehdār Širāzi.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 2017 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Of Islamic Grammatology: Ibn Turka’s Lettrist Metaphysics of Light.” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā 24 (2016): 42-113.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Quest for a Universal Science: The Occult Philosophy of Ṣāʾin al-Dīn Turka Iṣfahānī (1369-1432) and Intellectual Millenarianism in Early Timurid Iran.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 2012.
Milton, John. Areopagitica, edited by John W. Hales. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898.
Mīr Dāmād. Taqwīm al-īmān, with cmt. by Sayyid Aḥmad al-ʿAlawī al-ʿĀmilī, Kashf al-ḥaqāʾiq, and glosses by Mullā ʿAlī al-Nūrī, edited by ʿAlī Awjabī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1385 Sh./2006.
Mīr Dāmād. R. al-Īqāẓāt fī khalq al-aʿmāl, edited by Ḥāmid Nājī Iṣfahānī. Tehran: Muʾassasa-yi Pazhūhishī-yi Ḥikmat u Falsafa-yi Īrān, 1391 Sh./2012.
Mīr Dāmād. Jadhawāt u mawāqīt, with glosses by Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī, edited by ʿAlī Awjabī. Tehran: Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 1380 Sh./2001.
Mīr Dāmād. Nibrās al-ḍiyāʾ wa-taswāʾ al-sawāʾ fī sharḥ bāb al-badāʾ wa-ithbāt jadwā l-duʿāʾ, with glosses by Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī, edited by Ḥāmid Nājī Iṣfahānī. Tehran: Hijrat, 1374 Sh./1995.
Modarressi, Hossein. Tradition and Survival: A Bibliographical Survey of Early Shīʿite Literature, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oneworld, 2003.
Morrison, Robert. “A Scholarly Intermediary between the Ottoman Empire and Renaissance Europe.” Isis 105 (2014): 32-57.
Mudarris Tabrīzī, Muḥammad ʿAlī. Rayḥānat al-adab. 6 vols. Tehran: Khayyām, 1374 Sh./1995.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the Land of Prophecy. Albany: SUNY Press, 2006.
Newman, Andrew J. “Dāmād, Mir.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 1993 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
al-Oraibi, Ali. “Rationalism in the School of Bahrain: A Historical Perspective.” In Shīʿite Heritage: Essays on Classical and Modern Traditions, edited by L. Clarke, 331-344. Binghamton: Global Publications, 2001.
Otto, Bernd-Christian. “Magie im Islam: Eine diskursgeschichtliche Perspektive.” In Die Geheimnisse der oberen und der unteren Welt: Magie im Islam zwischen Glaube und Wissenschaft, edited by Sebastian Günther and Dorothee Pielow, 515-546. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Piątak, Łukasz. “Between Philosophy, Mysticism and Magic: A Critical Edition of Occult Writings of and Attributed to Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī (1156-1191).” PhD dissertation, University of Warsaw, 2018.
Pourjavady, Reza. Philosophy in Early Safavid Iran: Najm al-Dīn Maḥmūd al-Nayrīzī and His Writings. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
Pourjavady, Reza and Sabine Schmidtke. “An Eastern Renaissance? Greek Philosophy under the Safavids (16th-18th Centuries AD).” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 3 (2015): 248-290.
Ragep, F. Jamil. “Copernicus and His Islamic Predecessors: Some Historical Remarks.” History of Science 45 (2007): 65-81.
Rieu, Charles. Catalogue of the Persian Manuscripts in the British Museum. 3 vols. London: British Museum, 1966.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī.” In Philosophy in Qajar Iran, edited by Reza Pourjavady, 125-178. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Mīr Dāmād’s (d. 1631) al-Qabasāt: The Problem of the Eternity of the Cosmos.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, edited by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke, 438-464. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Philosophy as a Way of Life in the World of Islam: Applying Hadot to the Study of Mullā Ṣadrā Shīrāzī (d. 1635).” Bulletin of SOAS 75, no. 1 (2012): 33-45.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Mīr Dāmād in India: Islamic Philosophical Traditions and the Problem of Creation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 131, no. 1 (2011): 9-23.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. Mullā Ṣadrā and Metaphysics: Modulation of Being. London: Routledge, 2009.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “(Neo)Platonism Revived in the Light of the Imams: Qāḍī Saʿīd Qummī (d. ah 1107/ad 1696) and His Reception of the Theologia Aristotelis.” In Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception, edited by Peter Adamson, 176-207. London: The Warburg Institute, 2007.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Isfahan School of Philosophy.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 2007 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Time and Creation: The Contribution of Some Safavid Philosophies.” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 62, no. 2.4 (2006): 713-737.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. “Mir Fendereski.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 2005 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
Saatchian, Firouzeh. Gottes Wesen – Gottes Wirken: Ontologie und Kosmologie im Denken von Šams-al-Dīn Muḥammad al-Ḫafrī (gest. 942/1535). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2011.
Saliba, George. “A Sixteenth-Century Arabic Critique of Ptolemaic Astronomy: The Work of Shams al-Dīn al-Khafrī.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 25 (1994): 15-38.
Saliba, George. “Khafri, Šams-al-Din.” Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, 2010 <http://www.iranicaonline.com.org>.
Sām Mīrzā Ṣafawī. Tadhkira-yi Tuḥfa-yi Sāmī, edited by Rukn al-Dīn Humāyūnfarrukh. Tehran: Asāṭīr, 1384 Sh./2005.
Savage-Smith, Emilie. “Magic and Islam.” In Francis Maddison and Emilie Savage-Smith, Science, Tools & Magic, Part One: Body and Spirit, Mapping the Universe, vol. 1, 66, cat. 21, no. 4. London: The Nour Foundation, 1997.
Shaw, Gregory. “Eros and Arithmos: Pythagorean Theurgy in Iamblichus and Plotinus.” Ancient Philosophy 19 (1999): 121-143.
al-Shaybī, Kāmil Muṣṭafā. Tashayyuʿ u taṣawwuf: Tā āghāz-i sada-yi dawāzdahum-i hijrī, translated by ʿAlī-Riḍā Dhakāwatī Qarāguzlū. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr, 1385 Sh./2006.
Shīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn. Durrat al-tāj li-ghurrat al-dabbāj: Bakhsh-i nukhustīn, edited by Muḥammad Mishkāt. Tehran: Ḥikmat, 1385 Sh./2006.
Shūshtarī, Qāḍī Nūr Allāh. Majālis al-muʾminīn. 2 vols. Tehran: Kitābfurūshī-yi Islāmiyya, 1365 Sh./1987.
Subtelny, Maria. “Kāshifī’s Asrār-i qāsimī: A Late Timurid Manual of the Occult Sciences and Its Safavid Afterlife.” In Islamicate Occult Sciences in Theory and Practice, edited by Liana Saif, Francesca Leoni, Matthew Melvin-Koushki and Farouk Yahya. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming 2020.
Taşköprüzāde, Aḥmed. Miftāḥ al-saʿāda wa-miṣbāḥ al-siyāda. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1405/1985.
Terrier, Mathieu. “Bursī, al-Ḥāfiẓ Rajab al-,” “Khafrī, Shams al-Dīn” and “Sayyid Ḥaydar Āmulī.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500, edited by Henrik Lagerlund. Dordrecht: Springer, forthcoming 2020.
Terrier, Mathieu. “La figure de Pythagore comme maître d’ésotérisme et de théologie monothéiste dans la philosophie islamique du XIe/XVIIe siècle.” Revue de l’histoire des religions (forthcoming 2020).
Terrier, Mathieu. “Mīr Dāmād (m. 1041/1631), philosophe et mujtahid: Autorité spirituelle et autorité juridique en Iran safavide shīʿite.” Studia Islamica 113, no. 2 (2018): 121-165.
Terrier, Mathieu. “The Wisdom of God and the Tragedy of History: The Concept of Appearance (badāʾ) in Mīr Dāmād’s Lantern of Brightness.” In Philosophy and the Intellectual Life in Shīʿah Islam, edited by Saiyad Nizamuddin Ahmad and Sajjad H. Rizvi, 94-133. London: The Shiʿah Institute Press, 2017.
Terrier, Mathieu. Histoire de la sagesse et philosophie shi’ite: « L’Aimé des cœurs » de Quṭb al-Dīn Aškevarī. Paris: Cerf, 2016.
Terrier, Mathieu. “La représentation de la sagesse grecque comme discours et mode de vie chez les philosophes šīʿites de l’Iran safavide (XIe/XVIIe siècle).” Studia graeco-arabica 5 (2015): 299-320.
Terrier, Mathieu. “Aspects d’une lecture philosophique du Coran dans l’œuvre de Mīr Dāmād.” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 64 (2012): 101-126.
Terrier, Mathieu. “De l’éternité ou de la nouveauté du monde: parcours d’un problème philosophique d’Athènes à Ispahan.” Journal Asiatique 299, no. 1 (2011): 369-421.
Terrier, Mathieu. “Quṭb al-Dīn Ashkevarī, un philosophe discret de la renaissance safavide.” Studia Iranica 40 (2011): 171-210.
Terrier, Mathieu. “Le Maḥbûb al-qulûb de Quṭb al-Dîn Ashkevarî: une œuvre méconnue dans l’histoire de l’histoire de la sagesse en islam.” Journal Asiatique 298, no. 2 (2010): 345-387.
Treiger, Alexander. “Avicenna’s Notion of Transcendental Modulation of Existence (tashkīk al-wuǧūd, analogia entis) and Its Greek and Arabic Sources.” In Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Studies in Honor of Dimitri Gutas, edited by Felicitas Opwis and David Reisman, 327-363. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
Tunikābunī, Muḥammad. Qiṣaṣ al-ʿulamāʾ, edited by Muḥammad-Riḍā Barzgar Khāliqī and ʿIffat Karbāsī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i ʿIlmī u Farhangī, 1383 Sh./2005.
ʿUmar, Aḥmad Mukhtār. “Juhūd Ibn Sīnā fī l-lugha wa-l-aṣwāt.” Majallat al-Baḥth al-ʿIlmī wa-l-Turāth al-Islāmī 5 (1402-3): 115-132.
Walbridge, John. The Leaven of the Ancients: Suhrawardī and the Heritage of the Greeks. Albany: suny Press, 2000.
Wasserstrom, Steven M. Religion after Religion: Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin at Eranos. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Wirszubski, Chaim. Pico della Mirandola’s Encounter with Jewish Mysticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Woods, John E. The Aqquyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire. Revised edition. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.
The heavily Neoplatonic and antiquarian-perennialist tenor of Safavid philosophy is now widely recognized by specialists; but few have acknowledged its equally notable Neopythagorean turn. Likewise, that the primary mode of applied Neoplatonic-Neopythagorean philosophy as a Safavid imperial way of life was occult science has been ignored altogether, making impossible a history of its practice. The case of the Twelver Shiʿi sage-mage Mīr Dāmād – famed down to the present as an occult scientist – is here especially illustrative: for he was largely responsible for this Neopythagoreanization of Safavid philosophy, which saw the remarkable transmogrification of Ibn Sīnā himself into a Neopythagorean-occultist, by his espousal of a peculiarly Mamluk-Timurid-Aqquyunlu brand of philosophical lettrism (ʿilm al-ḥurūf) in at least three of his many works. The example of this imperial Neopythagoreanizing lettrist is thus crucial for understanding the intellectual and religiopolitical continuity of Safavid Shiʿi culture with Sunni precedent, as well as contemporary Persianate and Latinate parallels. Within Western history of science more broadly, Mīr Dāmād and the host of his fellow Muslim kabbalists must now be restored to the master mathesis narrative whereby scientific modernity is but the upshot of early modern Western philosophers’ penchant for reading the world as a mathematical text.
Les ténors néoplatoniciens et pérennialistes antiquaires de la philosophie safavide sont aujourd’hui largement reconnu par les spécialistes ; mais peu ont admis son tournant néopythagoricien tout aussi remarquable. De même que le mode principal de la philosophie néoplatonicienne-néopythagoricienne, en tant que mode de vie impérial safavide, soit la science occulte a été complètement ignoré, rendant impossible une histoire de sa pratique. Le cas du sage-mage shiʿite duodécimain Mīr Dāmād – connu jusqu’à présent comme un scientifique occulte – est ici particulièrement illustratif, car il est en grande partie responsable de cette néopythagorisation de la philosophie safavide – qui est allée jusqu’à la transmogrification d’Ibn Sīnā lui-même en occultiste néopythagoricien – par son adhésion à une marque particulière de lettrisme philosophique mamelouk-timouride-aqquyunlu (ʿilm al-ḥurūf) dans au moins trois de ses nombreuses œuvres. L’exemple de ce lettriste néopythagoricien impérial est donc crucial pour comprendre la continuité intellectuelle et religio-politique de la culture shiʿite safavide avec un précédent sunnite, ainsi que les parallèles persans et latins contemporains. De façon plus générale, Mīr Dāmād et le noyau de ses confrères kabbalistes musulmans doivent maintenant être restitués au récit de la mathesis qui a fait que la modernité scientifique n’est rien d’autre que le résultat du penchant des premiers philosophes occidentaux modernes à lire le monde comme un texte mathématique.