Even as a new historiographical narrative has emerged regarding post-Ġazālian kalām, one that forgoes assumptions of stagnation and posits instead a dynamic fusion with Avicennian philosophy, most studies so far have focused on the scholarly output of Persia and the broader Islamic East. This article aims to complement and complicate that research by analyzing the creedal writings of a major figure in the later theological history of the Islamic West, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī (d. 895/1490). Addressing the structure of these creeds, the citations of other scholars therein, and the treatment of the proof for the existence of God, I argue that al-Sanūsī positioned his theological project at a distance from what he considered the excessively philosophized kalām of Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1209-10) and his followers. I moreover suggest that understanding the creeds requires a greater appreciation for the Maghribi tradition of engagement with The Guide to Conclusive Proofs by Abū l-Maʿālī al-Ǧuwaynī (d. 478/1085).
Même si un nouveau récit historiographique du kalām post-ġazālian a vu le jour en renonçant aux hypothèses de la stagnation et en posant une fusion plus dynamique qu’on le pense d’ordinaire avec la philosophie avicennienne, la plupart des études se sont jusqu’à présent concentrées sur la production savante de la Perse et de l’Orient islamique au sens large. Cet article vise à compléter et complexifier cette recherche en analysant les écrits dogmatiques d’une figure majeure de l’histoire théologique tardive de l’Occident islamique, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī (m. 895/1490). Abordant la structure de ces dogmes, à l’appui de citations d’autres érudits et du traitement de la preuve de l’existence de Dieu, je soutiens qu’al-Sanūsī a placé son projet théologique à distance de ce qu’il considérait comme le kalām excessivement philosophé de Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (m. 606/1209-10) et ses disciples. Je suggère en outre que la compréhension des dogmes nécessite une plus grande appréciation de la tradition maghrébine dans son rapport au Guide des preuves concluantes d’Abū l-Maʿālī al-Ǧuwaynī (m. 478/1085).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ahmed, Asad Q., “Systematic Growth in Sustained Error: A Case Study in the Dynamism of Post-classical Islamic Scholasticism,” The Islamic Scholarly Tradition: Studies in History, Law, and Thought in Honor of Professor Michael Allan Cook, ed. Asad Q. Ahmed, Behnam Sadeghi, and Michael Bonner, Leiden: Brill, 2011, pp. 343-378.
Aïssani, Djamil, “Sur la traduction en langue Berbère de la ʿAqida as-Sughra d’as-Sanusi (1426-1490).” Études et documents Berbères 35-36 (2016): 67-88.
Al-Edrūs, Syed Muḥammad Dawīlah, “The Role of Kitab Jawi in the Development of Islamic Thought in the Malay Archipelago with Special Reference to Umm al-Barāhīn and the Writings on the Twenty Attributes,” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 1993.
al-Baḫtī, Ǧamāl ʿAllāl, ʿUṯmān al-Salāliǧī wa-maḏhabiyyatuhu al-Ašʿariyya: Dirāsa li-ǧānib min al-fikr al-kalāmī bi-l-Maġrib min ḫilāl al-Burhāniyya wa-šurūḥihā, Rabat: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Šuʾūn al-Islāmiyya, 2005.
al-Balawī, Aḥmad al-Wādī Āšī, Ṯabat Abī Ǧaʿfar Aḥmad b. ʿAlī al-Balawī al-Wādī Āšī, ed. ʿAbd Allāh al-ʿAmrānī, Beirut: Dār al-Ġarb al-Islāmī, 1983.
al-Bayḍāwī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar, Ṭawāliʿ al-anwār min maṭāliʿ al-anẓār, ed. ʿAbbās Sulaymān, Beirut: Dār al-Ǧīl, 1991.
al-Bayḍāwī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar, Nature, Man and God in Medieval Islam: ʿAbd Allah Baydawi’s text Tawaliʿ al-Anwar min Mataliʿ al-Anzar along with Mahmud Isfahani’s commentary Mataliʿ al-Anzar, Sharh Tawali’ al-Anwar, 2 vols., eds. and trans. Edwin E. Calverley and James W. Pollock, Leiden: Brill, 2002.
Bencheneb, H. “Al-Sanūsī,” The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., eds. P. Bearman, et al. Leiden: Brill, accessed online, Feb. 4, 2018.
Brenner, Louis, “Histories of Religion in Africa,” Journal of Religion in Africa 30, 2 (May 2000), pp. 143-167.
Brentjes, Sonja, “On the Location of the Ancient or ‘Rational’ Sciences in Muslim Educational Landscapes,” Bulletin of the Institute for Interfaith Studies 4 (2002), pp. 47-71.
Bruckmayr, Philipp, “The Šarḥ/ḥāšiya Phenomenon in Southeast Asia,” Mélanges – Institut dominicain d’études orientales du Caire 32 (2017), pp. 27-52.
Būqalī, Ǧamāl al-Dīn, “Āṯār al-fikr al-falsafī fī maḏhab Ibn Yūsuf al-Sanūsī al-Tilimsānī: Muqāraba anṯrūbūlūǧiyya,” PhD diss., University of Abou Bakr Belkaïd, 2013.
al-Būsklāwī, Saʿīd, “Baʿḍ simāt al-kalām al-Sanūsī wa-ḥudūduhu,” al-ʿIlm wa-l-taʿlīm fī bilād al-Maġrib min al-qarn al-tāsiʿ ilā al-qarn al-ṯānī ʿašr al-hiǧrī, ed. Saʿīd al-Būsklāwī, Oujda, Morocco: Centre d’etudes et de recherches humaines et sociales Oujda, 2016, pp. 83-128.
Casassas Canals, Xavier, “Traducciones, versiones, glosas y comentarios de la ʿAqīda de al-Sanūsī en español (siglos XVI-XVII),” Al-Irfan 2 (2016), pp. 209-221.
al-Darʿī al-Būsaʿīdī, Ibn Šarḥabīl, Šarḥ al-Ḥafīda, Rabat: Ḥasaniyya Library, MS 6470.
Davidson, H.A. “Avicenna’s Proof of the Existence of God as a Necessarily Existent Being,” Islamic Philosophical Theology, ed. P. Morewedge, Albany: SUNY Press, 1979, pp. 165-187.
Davidson, Herbert A., Proofs for Eternity, Creation, and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Eichner, Heidrun, “Handbooks in the Tradition of Later Eastern Ashʿarism,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Sabine Schmidtke, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 394-514.
El-Rouayheb, The Development of Arabic Logic (1200-1800), Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 2019.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled, Islamic Intellectual History in the Seventeenth Century: Scholarly Currents in the Ottoman Empire and the Maghreb, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled, “Theology and Logic,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, pp. 408-432.
Fierro, Maribel, “The Religious Policy of the Almohads,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, pp. 679-692.
Gómez-Rivas, Camilo, Law and the Islamization of Morocco under the Almoravids: The Fatwas of Ibn Rushd al-Jadd to the Far Maghrib, Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Griffel, Frank, Al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Griffel, Frank, “Ibn Tūmart’s Rational Proof for God’s Existence and Unity, and His Connection to the Niẓāmiyya Madrasa in Baghdad,” Los almohades: Problemas y perspectivas, vol. 2, eds. Patrice Cressier, Maribel Fierro and Luís Molina, Madrid: CSIC/Casa de Velasquez, 2005, pp. 753-812.
Griffel, Frank, “On Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Life and the Patronage He Received,” Journal of Islamic Studies 18, 3 (2007), pp. 313-344.
Griffel, Frank, “Theology Engages with Philosophy,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, pp. 435-455.
Ġurāb, Saʿd, “‘Muršidat’ Ibn Tūmart wa-aṯruhā fī l-tafkīr al-Maġribī,” Les Cahiers de Tunisie 26, 105-6 (1978), pp. 108-136.
al-Ǧuwaynī, Abū l-Maʿālī, Kitāb al-iršād ilā qawātiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād, eds. Muḥammad Yūsuf Mūsā and ʿAlī ʿAbd al-Munʿim ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd, Egypt: Maktabat al-Ḫanǧī, 1950.
Ḥamdān, Aḥmad, “Fī tayyāray al-ʿaqīda al-sunniyya bi-l-ġarb al-Islāmī,” Maǧalat Kulliyat al-Adāb, 3 (1988), pp. 169-240.
al-Ḥāmidī, Ismāʿīl, Ḥawāšin ʿalā šarḥ al-Kubrā li-l-Sanūsī, Egypt: Maṭbaʿat Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa-Awlādihi, 1936.
Harvey, L.P., “A Morisco Manuscript in the Godolphin Collection at Wadham College, Oxford,” Al-Andalus 27, 2 (1962), pp. 461-465.
Hassan, Laura, “The Encounter of Falsafa and Kalām in Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī’s Discussion of the Atom: Asserting Traditional Boundaries, Questioning Traditional Doctrines,” SOAS Journal of Postgraduate Research 6 (2014), pp. 77-98.
al-Ḥurayshī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. al-ʿArabī, al-Fihris al-mūǧaz li-maḫṭūṭāt Muʾassasat ʿAllāl al-Fāsī, vol. 2, Rabat: Muʾassasat ʿAllāl al-Fāsī, 1992.
Ibn al-ʿArabī, Abū Bakr, al-Kitāb al-mutawassiṭ fī l-iʿtiqād wa-l-radd ʿalā man ḫālafa al-sunna min dhawī al-bidaʿ wa-l-ilḥād, ed. ʿAbd Allāh al-Tawrātī, Beirut: Dār al-Ḥadīth al-Kattāniyya, 2015.
Ibn ʿArafa, Muḥammad, al-Muḫtaṣar al-kalāmī, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Kuwait: Dār al-Ḍīyāʾ, 2014.
Ibn ʿArḍūn, Muḥammad, al-Tuḥfa al-ʿazīza fī šarḥ al-ʿAqīda al-waǧīza, ed. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Muḥammad al-Ġanāmī, PhD diss., Qarawiyīn University, 2001.
Ibn ʿAskar, Muḥammad, Dawḥat al-nāšir li-maḥāsin man kāna bi-l-Maġrib min mašāyiḫ al-qarn al-ʿāšir, 4th ed., ed. Muḥammad Ḥaǧǧī, Casablanca: Markaz al-Turāṯ al-Ṯaqāfī al-Maġribī, 2015.
Ibn Ḫaldūn, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, al-Muqaddima, 2 vols., ed. ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Darwīš, Damascus: Dār al-Balḫī, 2004.
Ibn Maryam, Muḥammad, El Bostan, ou Jardin des biographies des saints et savants de Tlemcen, trans. F. Provenzali, Algiers: Imprimerie Orientale Fontana Frères & Cie, 1910.
Ibn Maryam, Muḥammad, al-Bustān fī ḏikr al-ʿulamāʾ wa-l-awlīyāʾ bi-Tilimsān, ed. Muḥammad Ibn Abī Shanab, Algiers: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Ṯaʿālibiyya, 1908.
Ibn Rušd, Muḥammad Abū l-Walīd, Fatāwā Ibn Rušd, ed. al-Muḫtār Ibn al-Ṭāhir Talīlī, Beirut: Dār al-Ġarb al-Islāmī, 1987.
Ibn Sīnā, Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥusayn, al-Naǧāt fī l-ḥikma al-manṭiqiyya wa-l-ṭabīʿiyya wa-l-ilāhiyya, Cairo: Muḥī l-Dīn Ṣabrī al-Kurdī, 1938.
Ibn al-Tilimsānī, Šaraf al-Dīn, Šarḥ Maʿālim uṣūl al-dīn, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Beirut: Dār Maktabat al-Maʿārif, 2011.
Ibn Tūmart, Muḥammad, Aʿazz mā yuṭlab, ed. ʿAmmār Ṭālibī, Algiers: al-Muʾassasa al-Waṭaniyya li-l-Kitāb, 1985.
Ibn Zakrī, Aḥmad, Buġyat al-ṭālib fī šarḥ ʿAqīdat Ibn al-Ḥāǧib, ed. ʿAlī Farīd Daḥrūǧ, Algiers: Dār al-Ḫaldūniyya, 2013.
Ibn Zakrī, Aḥmad, Muḥaṣṣil al-maqāṣid mimā bi-hi tuʿtabar al-ʿaqāʾid, 2 vols., ed. ʿAbd al-Razzāq Daḥmūn, Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2014. Printed with the commentary Muḫtaṣar naẓm al-farāʾid by Aḥmad al-Manǧūr.
Iḥnāna, Yūsuf, Taṭawwur al-maḏhab al-Ašʿarī fī l-ġarb al-Islāmī, 2nd ed., Rabat: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Šuʿūn al-Islāmiyya, 2017.
Jappie, Saarah, “From the Madrasah to the Museum: the Social Life of the ‘Kietaabs’ of Cape Town,” History in Africa 38 (2011), pp. 369-399.
Jusoh, Che’ Razi, The Malay Exposition of al-Sanūsī’s Umm al-Barāhīn, Kuala Lumpur: ISSI Publications, 2017.
Karimullah, Kamran, “Aḥmad Zarrūq and the Ashʿarite School,” MA thesis, McGill University, 2007.
Kenny, Joseph P., “Muslim Theology as Presented by M. b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī, Especially in His al-ʿAqīda al-Wusṭā,” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 1970.
Lagardère, Vincent, “Une théologie dogmatique de la frontière en al-Andalous aux XIe et XIIe siècles: L’Ashʿarisme,” Anaquel de Estudios Árabes 5 (1994), pp. 71-98.
Lammer, Andreas, “Eternity and Origination in the Works of Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī and Athīr al-Dīn al-Abharī: Two Discussions from the Seventh/Thirteenth Century,” Muslim World 107, 3 (2017), pp. 432-481.
Loimeier, Roman, Between Social Skills and Marketable Skills: The Politics of Islamic Education in 20th-century Zanzibar, Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Madelung, Wilferd, “Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī’s Proof for the Existence of God,” Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy: From the Many to the One – Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank, ed. James E. Montgomery, Leuven: Peeters, 2006, pp. 273-280.
Madelung, Wilferd, “The Late Muʿtazila and Determinism: The Philosophers’ Trap,” Islamistica, vol. 1 of Yād-nāma: In Memoria di Alessandro Bausani, eds. Biancamaria Scarcia Amoretti and Lucia Rostagno, Rome: Bardi Editore, 1991, pp. 245-257.
al-Mallālī, Muḥammad, al-Mawāhib al-qudūsiyya fī l-manāqib al-Sanūsiyya, ed. ʿAllāl Būrbīq, vol. 5 of al-Imām Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī al-Tilimsānī: Ḥayātuhu wa-āṯāruhu, Bū Saʿāda, Algeria: Dār al-Kardāda, 2011.
McGinnis, Jon, “The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary,” The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything At All Rather Than Nothing Whatsover? ed. John F. Wippel, Washington DC: Catholic University of American Press, 2011, pp. 65-83.
al-Muqtaraḥ, Taqī l-Dīn Muẓaffar, Šarḥ al-ʿAqīda al-burhāniyya wa-l-fuṣūl al-īmāniyya, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Holland: Manšūrāt Maktabat al-Sunna, 2009.
al-Muqtaraḥ, Taqī l-Dīn Muẓaffar, Šarḥ al-Iršād fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād, 2 vols., ed. Nazīha Imʿārīj, Rabat: Dār al-Amān, 2014.
Pourjavady, Reza, Philosophy in Early Safavid Iran, Leiden: Brill, 2011.
al-Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn, Muḥaṣṣal afkār al-mutaqaddimīn wa-l-mutaʾḫḫirīn min al-ʿulamāʾ wa-l-ḥukamāʾ wa-l-mutakallimīn, ed. Ṭaha al-Ruʾūf Saʿd, Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyāt al-Azhariyya, 1978.
Reisman, David C. and Jon McGinnis, eds., Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2007.
al-Salāliǧī, ʿUṯmān. al-ʿAqīda al-burhāniyya al-Ašʿariyya, ed. Ǧamāl ʿAllāl al-Baḫtī, Tetouan, Morocco: Salwā al-Andalusī, 2008.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, “al-Ḥafīda,” Ṯalāṯ ʿaqāʾid Ašʿariyya, ed. Ḫālid Zahrī, Tetouan, Morocco: Markaz Abī Ḥasan al-Ašʿarī, 2012, pp. 129-135.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, “al-Ḥaqāʾiq fī taʿrīfāt muṣṭalaḥāt ʿulamāʾ al-kalām,” Tarǧamat al-imām Abī ʿAbd Allāh al-Sanūsī al-Tilimsānī wa-taḥqīq baʿḍ rasāʾilihi, ed. Māḥī Qundūz, vol. 6 of al-Imām Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī al-Tilimsānī: Ḥayātuhu wa-āthāruhu, Bū Saʿāda, Algeria: Dār Kardāda, 2011, pp. 131-159.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, Kitāb Umm al-barāhīn: Šarḥ al-ʿAqīda al-ṣuġrā, ed. Muḥammad Ṣādiq Darwīš, Damascus: Dār al-Bayrūtī, 2009.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, al-Manhaǧ al-sadīd fī šarḥ Kifāyat al-murīd: Šarḥ li-l-manẓūma al-musammā bi-l-Ǧazāʾiriyya, ed. Musṭafā Marzūqī, ʿAyn Malīla, Algeria: Dār al-Hudā, 1994.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, Šarḥ al-Muqaddimāt, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Beirut: Maktabat al-Maʿārif, 2009.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, Šarḥ Ṣuġrā al-ṣuġrā fī ʿilm al-tawḥīd, ed. Saʿīd ʿAbd al-Laṭīf Fūda, Amman: Dār al-Rāzī, 2006.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, Šarḥ al-Wusṭā, Tunis: Maṭbaʿat al-Taqaddum al-Waṭaniyya, 1909.
al-Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, ʿUmdat ahl al-tawfīq wa-l-tasdīd fī šarḥ ʿAqīdat ahl al-tawḥīd [=Šarḥ al-Kubrā], Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Ǧarīdat al-Islām, 1899.
Serrano Ruano, Delfina, “Later Ashʿarism in the Islamic West,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, pp. 515-533.
Serrano Ruano, Delfina, “Los Almorávides y la teología Ašʿarí: Contestación o legitimación de una disciplina marginal?” Identidades Marginales, ed. Cristina de la Puente, Madrid: CSIC, 2003, pp. 461-516.
Serrano Ruano, Delfina, “¿Por qué llamaron los almohades antropomorfistas a los almorávides?” Los Almohades, vol. 2, pp. 815-852.
Shihadeh, Ayman, “Al-Rāzī’s (d. 1210) Commentary on Avicenna’s Pointers,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, eds. Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 296-325.
Shihadeh, Ayman, “From al-Ghazālī to al-Rāzī: 6th/12th Century Developments in Muslim Philosophical Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15, 1 (2005), pp. 141-179.
Shihadeh, Ayman, “The Existence of God,” The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, ed. T.J. Winter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 197-217.
Street, Tony, “Concerning the Life and Works of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī,” Islam: Essays on Scripture, Thought, and Society: A Festschrift in Honour of Anthony H. Johns, eds. Peter G. Riddell and Tony Street, Leiden: Brill, 1997, pp. 135-146.
al-Sugtānī, ʿĪsā, al-Tuḥfa al-mufīda fī šarḥ al-ʿAqīda al-ḥafīda, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Kuwait: Dār al-Ḍīyāʾ, 2012.
Thiele, Jan, “Ashʿarism in the Ḥafṣid Era,” Philosophical Theology in Medieval Islam: The Later Ashʿarite Tradition, eds. Ayman Shihadeh and Jan Thiele, forthcoming.
Thiele, Jan, “Emergence and Consolidation of Ashʿarism,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, pp. 225-241.
Thiele, Jan, “Facing the Mahdī’s True Belief: Abū ʿAmr al-Salālijī’s Ashʿarite Creed and the Almohads’ Claim to Religious Authority,” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā: The Journal of Middle East Medievalists 26 (2018), pp. 96-112.
al-Tinbuktī, Aḥmad Bābā. Nayl al-ibtihāǧ bi-taṭrīz al-dībāǧ, ed. ʿAbd al-Maǧīd ʿAbd Allāh al-Harrāma, 2nd ed., Tripoli, Libya: Dār al-Kātib, 2000.
al-ʿUqbanī, Saʿīd Abū ʿUṯmān, al-ʿAqīda al-burhāniyya wa-l-fuṣūl al-īmāniyya maʿ Šarḥ al-ʿAqīda al-burhāniyya, ed. Nizār Ḥammādī, Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Maʿārif, 2008.
van Dalen, Dorrit, Doubt, Scholarship and Society in 17th-Century Central Sudanic Africa, Leiden: Brill, 2016.
van den Boogert, Nico, The Berber Literary Tradition of the Sous, Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 1997.
Wensinck, A.J., The Muslim Creed: Its Genesis and Historical Development, New York: Routledge, 2008 (first published 1932).
Wiegers, Gerard, “Las obras de polémica religiosa escritas por los moriscos fuera de España,” Los Moriscos: expulsión y diáspora, eds. Mercedes García-Arenal and Gerard Wiegers, Valencia: Universitat de València, 2013, pp. 391-413.
Wiegers, Gerard, “The Expulsion of 1609-1614 and the Polemical Writings of the Moriscos Living in the Diaspora,” Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain: A Mediterranean Diaspora, eds. Mercedes García-Arenal and Gergard Wiegers, trans. Consuelo López-Morillas and Martin Beagles, Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 389-412.
Wijoyo, Alex Soesilo, “Shaykh Nawawi of Banten: Texts, Authority, and the Gloss Tradition,” PhD diss., Columbia University, 1997.
Wisnovsky, Robert, “Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition,” The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, eds. Peter Adamson and Richard C. Taylor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 92-136.
Wisnovsky, Robert, “Avicenna’s Islamic Reception,” Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Peter Adamson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 190-213.
Wisnovsky, Robert, Islamic Analytical Theology, Volume II: The Post-classical Period, ca. 1100-1900 – A List of Authors and Works, forthcoming.
Wisnovsky, Robert, “The Nature and Scope of Arabic Philosophical Commentary in Post-classical (ca. 1100-1900 AD) Islamic Intellectual History: Some Preliminary Observations,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47 (2004), pp. 149-191.
Wisnovsky, Robert, “One Aspect of the Avicennian Turn in Sunnī Theology,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2014), pp. 65-100.
Wisnovsky, Robert, “Towards a Genealogy of Avicennism,” Oriens 42 (2014), pp. 323-363.
Zahrī, Ḫālid and ʿAbd al-Maǧīd Būkārī, Fihris al-kutub al-maḫṭūṭa fī l-ʿaqīda al-Ašʿariyya, 2 vols., Rabat: Dār Abī Raqrāq, 2011.
Zahrī, Ḫālid, Min ʿilm al-kalām ilā fiqh al-kalām: Muqāraba li-ibrāz maʿālim al-taǧdīd al-kalāmī ʿind fuqahāʾ wa-ṣūfiyat al-Maġrib, Kuwait: Dār al-Ḍīyāʾ, 2017.
Zahrī, Ḫālid, Ṯalāṯ ʿaqāʾid Ašʿariyya, Rabat and Tetouan, Morocco: Markaz Abī Ḥasan al-Ašʿarī, 2012.
Even as a new historiographical narrative has emerged regarding post-Ġazālian kalām, one that forgoes assumptions of stagnation and posits instead a dynamic fusion with Avicennian philosophy, most studies so far have focused on the scholarly output of Persia and the broader Islamic East. This article aims to complement and complicate that research by analyzing the creedal writings of a major figure in the later theological history of the Islamic West, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī (d. 895/1490). Addressing the structure of these creeds, the citations of other scholars therein, and the treatment of the proof for the existence of God, I argue that al-Sanūsī positioned his theological project at a distance from what he considered the excessively philosophized kalām of Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1209-10) and his followers. I moreover suggest that understanding the creeds requires a greater appreciation for the Maghribi tradition of engagement with The Guide to Conclusive Proofs by Abū l-Maʿālī al-Ǧuwaynī (d. 478/1085).
Même si un nouveau récit historiographique du kalām post-ġazālian a vu le jour en renonçant aux hypothèses de la stagnation et en posant une fusion plus dynamique qu’on le pense d’ordinaire avec la philosophie avicennienne, la plupart des études se sont jusqu’à présent concentrées sur la production savante de la Perse et de l’Orient islamique au sens large. Cet article vise à compléter et complexifier cette recherche en analysant les écrits dogmatiques d’une figure majeure de l’histoire théologique tardive de l’Occident islamique, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Sanūsī (m. 895/1490). Abordant la structure de ces dogmes, à l’appui de citations d’autres érudits et du traitement de la preuve de l’existence de Dieu, je soutiens qu’al-Sanūsī a placé son projet théologique à distance de ce qu’il considérait comme le kalām excessivement philosophé de Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (m. 606/1209-10) et ses disciples. Je suggère en outre que la compréhension des dogmes nécessite une plus grande appréciation de la tradition maghrébine dans son rapport au Guide des preuves concluantes d’Abū l-Maʿālī al-Ǧuwaynī (m. 478/1085).