Bett, Richard. 2019. “Can We Be Ancient Sceptics?” In his How to Be a Pyrrhonist: The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism, 226–243. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bett, Richard. 2019. “Can We Be Ancient Sceptics?” In his How to Be a Pyrrhonist: The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism, 226–243. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bueno, Otávio. 2015. “Realism and Anti-Realism about Science: a Pyrrhonian Stance,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5 (2): 145–167.

Bueno, Otávio. 2015. “Realism and Anti-Realism about Science: a Pyrrhonian Stance,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5 (2): 145–167.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Feldman, Richard. 2006. “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement.” In S. Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures, 216–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feldman, Richard. 2006. “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement.” In S. Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures, 216–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hankinson, R.J. 1995. The Sceptics. New York: Routledge.

Hankinson, R.J. 1995. The Sceptics. New York: Routledge.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kuhlmann, Meinard. 2013. “What is Real?” Scientific American 309 (2): 40–47.

Kuhlmann, Meinard. 2013. “What is Real?” Scientific American 309 (2): 40–47.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca, Diego E. 2011. “The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2): 148–161.

Machuca, Diego E. 2011. “The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2): 148–161.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca, Diego E. (ed.). 2013a. Disagreement and Skepticism. New York: Routledge.

Machuca, Diego E. (ed.). 2013a. Disagreement and Skepticism. New York: Routledge.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca, Diego E. 2013b. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Approach to the Epistemology of Disagreement.” In Machuca 2013a, 66–89.

Machuca, Diego E. 2013b. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Approach to the Epistemology of Disagreement.” In Machuca 2013a, 66–89.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca, Diego E. 2017. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Response to the Disagreeing about Disagreement Argument,” Synthese 194 (5): 1663–1680.

Machuca, Diego E. 2017. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Response to the Disagreeing about Disagreement Argument,” Synthese 194 (5): 1663–1680.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca, Diego E. & Reed, Baron (eds.). 2018. Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Machuca, Diego E. & Reed, Baron (eds.). 2018. Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Academic.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Nussbaum, Martha. 1991. “Skeptic Purgatives: Therapeutic Arguments in Ancient Skepticism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (4): 521–557.

Nussbaum, Martha. 1991. “Skeptic Purgatives: Therapeutic Arguments in Ancient Skepticism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (4): 521–557.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Perin, Casey 2010. The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perin, Casey 2010. The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Plato. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Translated by M. Burnyeat and M.J. Levett. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Plato. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Translated by M. Burnyeat and M.J. Levett. Indianapolis: Hackett.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York: Routledge.

Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York: Routledge.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Reed, Baron. 2018. “Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy.” In Machuca and Reed 2018, 523–534.

Reed, Baron. 2018. “Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy.” In Machuca and Reed 2018, 523–534.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sextus Empiricus. 2000. Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by J. Annas and J. Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sextus Empiricus. 2000. Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by J. Annas and J. Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Spinelli, Emidio. 2010. “Pyrrhonism and the Specialized Sciences.” In R. Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, 249–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spinelli, Emidio. 2010. “Pyrrhonism and the Specialized Sciences.” In R. Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, 249–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stanford, P.K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stanford, P.K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stanford, P.K. 2009. “Scientific Realism, the Atomic Theory, and the Catch-all Hypothesis: Can We Test Fundamental Theories Against All Serious Alternatives?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2): 253–269.

Stanford, P.K. 2009. “Scientific Realism, the Atomic Theory, and the Catch-all Hypothesis: Can We Test Fundamental Theories Against All Serious Alternatives?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2): 253–269.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stanford, P.K. 2015. “‘Atoms Exist’ Is Probably True, and Other Facts That Should Not Comfort Scientific Realists,” Journal of Philosophy 112 (8): 397–416.

Stanford, P.K. 2015. “‘Atoms Exist’ Is Probably True, and Other Facts That Should Not Comfort Scientific Realists,” Journal of Philosophy 112 (8): 397–416.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Thorsrud, Harald. 2011. “Sextus Empiricus on Skeptical Piety.” In D.E. Machuca (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism, 91–111. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

Thorsrud, Harald. 2011. “Sextus Empiricus on Skeptical Piety.” In D.E. Machuca (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism, 91–111. Leiden & Boston: Brill.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Vogt, Katja Maria. 2012. Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato. New York: Oxford University Press.

Vogt, Katja Maria. 2012. Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato. New York: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Williams, Michael. 2010. “Descartes’ Transformation of the Sceptical Tradition.” In R. Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, 288–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Michael. 2010. “Descartes’ Transformation of the Sceptical Tradition.” In R. Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, 288–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation