Alston W. P. (1985). “Concepts of Epistemic Justification,” Monist 68: 57–89.

AlstonW. P. (1985). “Concepts of Epistemic Justification,” Monist 68: 57–89.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (1986). “Epistemic Circularity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 1–30.

——. (1986). “Epistemic Circularity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 1–30.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Annas J., , & Barnes J. (1985). The Modes of Scepticism. Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AnnasJ., & BarnesJ. (1985). The Modes of Scepticism. Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (2000). Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

——. (2000). Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Barnes J. (1990). The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BarnesJ. (1990). The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bergmann M., (2008). “Externalist Responses to Skepticism,” 504–38 in Greco J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BergmannM. (2008). “Externalist Responses to Skepticism,” 504–38 in GrecoJ. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bett R. (2005). Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BettR. (2005). Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bueno O., (2011). “Is the Pyrrhonist an Internalist?” 179–92 in Machuca D. E. (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

BuenoO. (2011). “Is the Pyrrhonist an Internalist?” 179–92 in MachucaD. E. (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden/Boston: Brill.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Christensen D. (2009). “Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy,” Philosophy Compass 4: 756–67.

ChristensenD. (2009). “Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy,” Philosophy Compass 4: 756–67.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Klein P. D., (2001/2010). “Skepticism,” in Zalta E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/>

KleinP. D. (2001/2010). “Skepticism,” in ZaltaE. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/>)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lammenranta M., (2008). “The Pyrrhonian Problematic,” 9–33 in Greco J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LammenrantaM. (2008). “The Pyrrhonian Problematic,” 9–33 in GrecoJ. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (2011a). “Disagreement, Skepticism, and the Dialectical Conception of Justification,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1: 3–17.

——. (2011a). “Disagreement, Skepticism, and the Dialectical Conception of Justification,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1: 3–17.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (2011b). “Skepticism and Disagreement,” 203–53 in Machuca D. E. (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

——. (2011b). “Skepticism and Disagreement,” 203–53 in MachucaD. E. (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Leite A. (2004). “On Justifying and Being Justified,” Philosophical Issues 14: 219–53.

LeiteA. (2004). “On Justifying and Being Justified,” Philosophical Issues 14: 219–53.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (2005). “A Localist Solution to the Regress of Epistemic Justification,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 395–421.

——. (2005). “A Localist Solution to the Regress of Epistemic Justification,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 395–421.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Machuca D. E. (2011). “The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93: 148–61.

MachucaD. E. (2011). “The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93: 148–61.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mates B. (1996). The Skeptic Way. Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MatesB. (1996). The Skeptic Way. Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Pappas G., (2005). “Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification,” in Zalta E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. < http://plato.stanford.edu/>

PappasG. (2005). “Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification,” in ZaltaE. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. < http://plato.stanford.edu/>)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Perin C. (2010). The Demands of Reason. An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PerinC. (2010). The Demands of Reason. An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Rescorla M. (2009a). “Epistemic and Dialectical Regress,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 43–60.

RescorlaM. (2009a). “Epistemic and Dialectical Regress,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 43–60.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

——. (2009b). “Shifting the Burden of Proof?” Philosophical Quarterly 59: 86–109.

——. (2009b). “Shifting the Burden of Proof?” Philosophical Quarterly 59: 86–109.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sosa E. (1997). “How to Resolve the Pyrrhonian Problematic: A Lesson from Descartes,” Philosophical Studies 85: 229–49.

SosaE. (1997). “How to Resolve the Pyrrhonian Problematic: A Lesson from Descartes,” Philosophical Studies 85: 229–49.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Steup M., (2001/2008). “The Analysis of Knowledge,” in Zalta E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/>

SteupM. (2001/2008). “The Analysis of Knowledge,” in ZaltaE. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/>)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Williams M. (1988). “Scepticism Without Theory,” Review of Metaphysics 41: 547–88.

WilliamsM. (1988). “Scepticism Without Theory,” Review of Metaphysics 41: 547–88.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 For this difference, see Bueno (2011), 183–6. Yet he exploits it in another way.

 See Bergmann (2008) for an overview of the discussion initiated by Alston (1986).