Scepticism and Naturalism in Cavell and Hume

In: International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

This essay argues that the exploration of scepticism and its implications in the work of Stanley Cavell and David Hume bears more similarities than is commonly acknowledged, especially along the lines of what I wish to call “sceptical naturalism.” These lines of similarity are described through the way each philosopher relates the “natural” and “nature” to the universal, the necessary, and the conventional.

  • AlcoffL. (1991–92). “The Problem of Speaking for OthersCulture Critique 20: 532.

  • BerryR. M. (2011). “‘Is “Us” Me?’ Cultural Studies and the Universality of Aesthetic Judgments.” In EldridgeR. and RhieB. (eds.) Stanley Cavell and Literary Studies: Consequences of Skepticism3046. New York: Continuum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BloorD. (1983). Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

  • BuckleS. (1999). “British Sceptical Realism: A Fresh Look at the British TraditionEuropean Journal of Philosophy 7: 129.

  • CassamQ. (2008). “Foreword.” In P. F. Strawson Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties vii–xvviii. London: Routledge.

  • CavellS. (1981a). The Senses of Walden: An Expanded Edition. San Francisco: North Point Press (First published 1972.)

  • ——. (1981b). Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • ——. (1984). Themes out of School: Effects and Causes. San Francisco: North Point Press.

  • ——. (1989). This New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein. Albuquerque: Living Batch Press.

  • ——. (1990). Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • ——. (1994). In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Romanticism and Skepticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • ——. (1999). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein Skepticism Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (First published 1979.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——. (2002). Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1969.)

  • ——. (2003a). Emerson’s Transcendental Etudes. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • ——. (2003b). Disowing Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ——. (2004). “Postscript to “The Investigations’ Everyday Aesthetics of Itself.” In De CaroM. & MacarthurD. (eds.) Naturalism in Question275279. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——. (2009). A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Exercises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • ——. (2010). Little Did I Know: Excerpts from Memory. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • CavellS. & SesonskeA.. (1951). “Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism in EthicsJournal of Philosophy 48: 517.

  • DeleuzeG. (1991). Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature trans. C. V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DerridaJ. (1997). The Politics of Friendship trans. G. Collins. New York: Verso.

  • EagletonT. (1990). The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • EmersonR. W. (1987). “Experience.” In FergusonA. R. & Ferguson CarrJ. (eds.) The Essays of Ralph Waldo Emerson243268. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (First published 1844.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FischerM. (1989). Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • FlemingR. (1993). The State of Philosophy: An Invitation to a Reading in Three Parts of Stanley Cavell’s The Claim of Reason. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoslP. (1994). “Doubt and Divinity: Cicero’s Influence on Hume’s Religious SkepticismHume Studies 20: 103120.

  • ——. (2010). “Skepticism and Naturalism in Hume.” In Keim CampbellJ. M. O’Rourke & SilversteinH. S. (eds.) Skepticism and Knowledge301332. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——. (2013). “Habit, Custom, History, and Hume’s Critical Philosophy.” In SparrowT. & HutchesonA. (eds.) A History of Habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu133151. Lanham, md: Lexington Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FriedlanderE. (2006). “On Examples, Representatives, Measures, Standards, and the Ideal.” In CraryA. and ShiehS. (ed.) Reading Cavell204217. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoodmanR. (2005). Contending with Stanley Cavell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • GouldT. (1998). Hearing Things: Voice and Method in the Writing of Stanley Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • ——. (2013). “Me, Myself, and Us: Autobiography and Method in the Writing of Stanley CavellConversations: The Journal of Cavell Studies 1: 418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrimstadP. (2011). “Emerson Discomposed: Skepticism, Naturalism, and the Search for Criteria in ‘Experience’.” In EldridgeR. and RhieB. (eds.) Stanley Cavell and Literary Studies: The Consequences of Skepticism163176. New York: Continuum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HammerE. (2002). Stanley Cavell: Skepticism Subjectivity and the Ordinary. Cambridge: Polity.

  • HumeD. (1985). “Of the Standard of Taste.” In MillerE. F. (ed.) Essays Moral Political and Literary226252. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics. (First published 1742.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——. (1998). Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals ed. BeauchampT. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (First published 1751.)

  • ——. (2000). Enquiry concerning Human Understanding ed. BeauchampT. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press 2000. (First published 1748.)

  • ——. (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature ed. Fate NortonD. & NortonM. J.2 vols. Oxford: The Clarendon Press 2007. (First published 1739–1740.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HusserlE. (2001). Logical Investigations volume 1 trans. J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.

  • ——. (2013). Cartesian Meditations trans. D. Cairns. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • KantI. (1952). Critique of Judgement trans. Creed MeredithJ.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (First published 1790.)

  • KripkeS. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • LaugierS. (2009). “Transcendentalism and the OrdinaryEuropean Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 1: 5369.

  • MalebrancheN. (1997). Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion ed. JolleyN. & ScottD.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1688.)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDowellJ. (1996). “Two Sorts of Naturalism.” In HursthouseR.LawrenceG. & QuinnW. (eds.) Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory149179. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGinnM. (2013). “Wittgenstein and Naturalism.” In De CaroM. & MacarthurD. (eds.) Normativity and Naturalism332352. New York: Columbia University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MiltonJ. (2004). Paradise Lost ed. OrgelS. & GoldbergJ.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (First published 1667.)

  • MulhallS. (1994). Stanley Cavell: Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • NeurathO. (1983). “Protocol Statements.” In CohenR. S. & NeurathM. (eds.) Philosophical Papers 1931–469199. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • QuineW. V. O. & UllianJ. S. (1970). The Web of Belief2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill1978.

  • QuineW. V. O. (1964). Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • ——. (1976). “Posits and Reality.” In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays246254. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • SartreJ.-P. (1983). Being and Nothingness trans. H. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.

  • Schmidt D. (forthcoming). On the Unbidden: A History of the Idea of Nature.

  • SmithH. (2002a). All Men and Both Sexes: Gender Politics and the False Universal in England 1640–1832. College Park: Penn State University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithN. (ed.). (2002b). Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. London: Routledge.

  • SmithJ. and SullivanP. (eds.). (2011). Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • StroudB. (1968). “Transcendental ArgumentsJournal of Philosophy 65: 241256.

  • Viehues-BaileyL. H. (2007). Beyond the Philosopher’s Fear: A Cavellian Reading of Gender Origin and Religion. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WittgensteinL. (1953). Philosophical Investigations trans. G. E. M. Anscombe 3rd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • ——. (1972). On Certainty ed. AnscombeG. E. M. & von WrightG. H.. New York: Harper Torchbook.

  • WrightC. (2002a). “Postscript to Chapter 8.” In SmithN. (2002) 160173.

    • Export Citation
  • ——. (2002b). “Human Nature?” In N. Smith (2002) 140173.

  • 9

    Gould (2013) interestingly and I think rightly relates Cavell’s (as I would relate Hume’s) evoking a universality of voice to a special mode of confession.

  • 36

    Wright (2002b) discussed by McGinn (2013: 322). See also McDowell (1996). One might call the dispositional model Quine’s as well (cf. Quine 1964).

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 121 98 9
Full Text Views 84 82 1
PDF Downloads 13 11 1