Save

Miracles, Hinges, and Grammar in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty

In: International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
Author:
Luigi Perissinotto Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy lperissi@unive.it

Search for other papers by Luigi Perissinotto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

In §513 of On Certainty Wittgenstein asks “What if something really unheard-of happened?” But with this question he is not asking us to make a forecast, a prediction, or some sort of empirico-psychological prophecy about our possible reactions. As I will attempt to show, the question regarding the unheard-of is part of Wittgenstein’s philosophical method—which is to say, it is one of the instruments with which he combats what he sees as the principal source of the confusions of philosophy: mistaking the grammatical for the empirical or, as he also says, the conceptual for the factual. In this sense the question regarding the unheard-of can shed some light on the grammatical status of what he calls “hinges.”

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 418 68 4
Full Text Views 201 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 73 13 1