Save

Skepticism and Epistemic Closure: Two Bayesian Accounts

In: International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
Authors:
Luca Moretti University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK, and Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, l.moretti@abdn.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Luca Moretti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Tomoji Shogenji Rhode Island College, Providence, USA, TShogenji@ric.edu

Search for other papers by Tomoji Shogenji in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This paper considers two novel Bayesian responses to a well-known skeptical paradox. The paradox consists of three intuitions: first, given appropriate sense experience, we have justification for accepting the relevant proposition about the external world; second, we have justification for expanding the body of accepted propositions through known entailment; third, we do not have justification for accepting that we are not disembodied souls in an immaterial world deceived by an evil demon. The first response we consider rejects the third intuition and proposes an explanation of why we have a faulty intuition. The second response, which we favor, accommodates all three intuitions; it reconciles the first and the third intuition by the dual component model of justification, and defends the second intuition by distinguishing two principles of epistemic closure.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 445 70 10
Full Text Views 146 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 47 1 0