In Defense of Piecemeal Skepticism

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
著者: Philip Atkins 1
浏览更多 浏览更少
  • 1 Temple University, USA

Anthony Brueckner and Jon Altschul suggest a version of skepticism according to which the skeptic posits a distinct skeptical hypothesis for each external world proposition that a person claims to know. In a recent issue of this journal, Eric Yang argues against this piecemeal approach. In this note, I show that Yang’s argument against piecemeal skepticism is fallacious.

  • Brueckner A., and Altschul J., (2010). “Terms of Envatment.” In Brueckner A., Essays on Skepticism, 174176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Yang E. (2015). “Against Piecemeal Skepticism,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5: 253256.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用


全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 60 31 0
全文浏览次数 104 4 0
PDF下载次数 16 4 0