Stroud, Hegel, Heidegger: A Transcendental Argument

in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper presents an original, ambitious, truth-directed transcendental argument for the existence of an ‘external world’. It begins with a double-headed starting-point: Stroud’s own remarks on the necessary conditions of language in general, and Hegel’s critique of the “fear of error.” The paper argues that the sceptical challenge requires a particular critical concept of thought as that which may diverge from reality, and that this concept is possible only through reflection on situations of error, in which how things are thought (or experienced) to be diverges from how things really are with independent items in an objective world. The existence of such a world is therefore a necessary condition of the possibility of scepticism: such scepticism is therefore false. I defend the argument against objections from Stroud’s sceptic and others. Drawing on Heidegger, the paper concludes by indicating that the chain of necessary conditions includes practical engagement with the world.

Stroud, Hegel, Heidegger: A Transcendental Argument

in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Sections

References

Annas J. and Barnes J. (ed. and trans.). 2000. Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ayer A. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

Ayer A. 1973. The Central Questions of Philosophy. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Ayer A. 1979. “Replies” In Macdonald G.F. (ed.) Perception and Identity277333. London: Macmillan.

Brueckner A. 1986. “Brains in a VatJournal of Philosophy 83: 148167.

Brueckner A. 1991. “The Omniscient Interpreter Rides AgainAnalysis 51: 192205.

Brueckner A. 1995. “Trying to Get Outside Your Own SkinPhilosophical Topics 23: 79111.

Brueckner A. 1996. “Modest Transcendental ArgumentsPhilosophical Perspectives 10: 285300.

Brueckner A. 1999. “Transcendental Arguments from Content Externalism.” In Stern R. (ed.) Transcendental Arguments229250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brueckner A. 2010. “Stroud’s ‘Transcendental Arguments’ Reconsidered.” In his Essays on Skepticism107113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brueckner A. 2016. “Skepticism and Content Externalism.” In Zalta E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/skepticism-content-externalism/.

Burge T. 1979. “Individualism and the MentalMidwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73121.

Burge T. 1982. “Other Bodies.” In Woodfield A. (ed.) Thought and Object97120. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Burge T. 1986. “Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception.” In Pettit P. & McDowell J. (eds.) Subject Thought and Context117136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coliva A. 2010. Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism Certainty and Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Davidson D. 1983. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In Heinrich D. (ed.) Kant oder Hegel? 423438. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Davidson D. 1984. “Radical Interpretation.” In his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation125139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidson D. 2001. “Three Varieties of Knowledge.” In his Subjective Intersubjective Objective205237. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Davies K. 1981. “Empiricism and the Private Language ArgumentThe Philosophical Quarterly 31: 343347.

DeRose K. 1995. “Solving the Skeptical ProblemPhilosophical Review 104: 152.

Grundmann T. & Misselhorn C. 2003. “Transcendental Arguments and Realism.” In Glock H. (ed.) Strawson and Kant205218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hegel G.W.F. 1977. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Miller A.V. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heidegger M. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie J. & Robinson E. . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Huemer M 2011. “Sense-Data.” In Zalta E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/sense-data/.

Kant I. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith N.K. . New York: St Martins Press.

Pritchard D. 2012. “Wittgenstein and the Groundlessness of Our BelievingSynthese 189: 255272.

Putnam H. 1981. “Brains in a Vat.” In his Reason Truth and History122. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rinard S. 2013. “Why Philosophy Can Overturn Commonsense.” In Gendler T. & Hawthorne J. (eds.) Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 4185212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rorty R. 1971. “Verificationism and Transcendental ArgumentsNoûs 5: 314.

Schmitt F. 1992. Knowledge and Belief. London: Routledge.

Stern R. (ed.). 1999. Transcendental Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stern R. 2000. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stern R. 2007. “Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for ModestyGrazer Philosophische Studien 74: 143161.

Stern R. 2017. “Transcendental Arguments.” In Zalta E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/transcendental-arguments/.

Strawson P.F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen and Co.

Stroud B. 1968. “Transcendental ArgumentsThe Journal of Philosophy 65. Reprinted in Stroud 2000925.

Stroud B. 1994. “Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities and Invulnerability.” In Parini P. (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology Dordrecht: Kluwer. Reprinted in Stroud 2000155176.

Stroud B. 1999a. “Radical Interpretation and Philosophical Scepticism.” In Hahn L.E. (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Company. Reprinted in Stroud 2000177202.

Stroud B. 1999b. “The Goal of Transcendental Arguments.” In Stern 1999. Reprinted in Stroud 2000203223.

Stroud B. 2000. Understanding Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor C. 1978. “The Validity of Transcendental ArgumentsProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79: 151165.

Unger P. 1984. Philosophical Relativity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Vogt K. 2016. “Ancient Skepticism.” In Zalta E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/skepticism-ancient/.

Westphal K. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

White S. 2007. “The Transcendental Significance of PhenomenologyPsyche 13: 131.

Wittgenstein L. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 19
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0