The Plain Inquirer’s Plain Evidence against the Global Skeptical Scenarios

in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
Author: Adam Leite 1
View More View Less
  • 1

Login via Institution

Article price:

25,00 €30,00 $

Penelope Maddy claims that we can have no evidence that we are not being globally deceived by an evil demon. However, Maddy’s Plain Inquirer holds that she has good evidence for a wide variety of claims about the world and her relation to it. She rejects the broadly Cartesian idea that she can’t be entitled to these claims, or have good evidence for them, or know them, unless she can provide a defense of them that starts from nowhere. She likewise rejects the more limited demand for a defense that makes use only of considerations that do not concern the world outside of her mind. She allows that some considerations about the world can be appealed to perfectly appropriately as fully adequate evidence in favor of other considerations about the world. So why can’t the Plain Inquirer rule out global skeptical hypotheses by producing evidence against them that depends upon other considerations about the world? Is there good reason for singling out global skeptical hypotheses such as I am not being deceived by an evil demon as requiring a different kind of treatment? Considerations about epistemic asymmetry and epistemic circularity, as well as Wittgensteinian considerations about the relation between evidence and the real-world and human background context, all lead to the conclusion that there is not.

  • Alston W. 1989 [1986]. “Epistemic Circularity.” In Alston W. , Epistemic Justification, 319349. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Austin J.L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Leite A. 2010. “How to Take Skepticism Seriously,” Philosophical Studies 148: 3960.

  • Leite A. 2011. “Austin on Dreams and Scepticism.” In Gustafsson M. and Sørli R. (eds.), The Philosophy of J. L. Austin, 78113. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leite A. 2013. “‘That’s Not Evidence; It’s Not Even True!’,” The Philosophical Quarterly 63: 81104.

  • Leite A. 2015. “Why Don’t I Know I’m Not a Brain-in-a-Vat?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 205213.

  • Leite A. MS. “Why Moore Matters,” available at: http://www.indiana.edu/~episteme/papers.php.

    • Export Citation
  • Maddy P. 2017. What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Marušić B. 2016. “Asymmetry Arguments,” Philosophical Studies 173: 10811102.

  • Williams B. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. London: Penguin.

  • Williamson T. 2002. Knowledge and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Wittgenstein L. 1969. On Certainty. Translated and edited by Anscombe G.E.M. and von Wright G.H. . Oxford: Blackwell.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 94 39 2
Full Text Views 93 5 0
PDF Downloads 11 1 0