In Unbelievable Errors, Bart Streumer offers resourceful arguments against each of non-reductive realism, reductive realism, and non-cognitivism, in order to motivate his version of the normative error theory, according to which normative predicates ascribe properties that do not exist. In this contribution, I argue that none of the steps of this master argument succeed, and that Streumer’s arguments leave puzzles about what it means to ascribe a property at all.
HorganT. and TimmonsM.2009. “Analytical Functionalism Meets Moral Twin Earth.” In RavenscroftI. (ed.) Mind Ethics and Conditionals: Themes from the Philosophy of Frank Jackson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.