Illegal Hunting and Angling:The Neutralization of Wildlife Law Violations

in Society & Animals
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This study provides a descriptive account of rationalizations for poaching used by wildlife law violators. There has been little research on motivations for poaching. This study uses qualitative data obtained from surveys and in-depth interviews with wildlife law violators and conservation officers in Kentucky to examine rationalizations used by wildlife law violators to excuse and justify participation in this type of illegal activity. Comments from conservation officers and violators revealed widespread use of rationalizations, with denial of responsibility being most common. The study also used claims of entitlement, defense of necessity, and denial of necessity of the law. Findings contribute to our knowledge of why people illegally take wildlife resources.

Illegal Hunting and Angling:The Neutralization of Wildlife Law Violations

in Society & Animals

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 185 185 66
Full Text Views 75 75 22
PDF Downloads 19 19 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0