Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Is nonhuman animal-assisted therapy (AAT) a form of exploitation? After exploring possible moral vindications of AAT and after establishing a distinction between "use" and "exploitation," the essay distinguishes between forms of animal-assisted therapy that are morally unobjectionable and those modes of it that ought to be abolished.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2215 | 565 | 60 |
Full Text Views | 477 | 129 | 13 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 691 | 250 | 33 |
Is nonhuman animal-assisted therapy (AAT) a form of exploitation? After exploring possible moral vindications of AAT and after establishing a distinction between "use" and "exploitation," the essay distinguishes between forms of animal-assisted therapy that are morally unobjectionable and those modes of it that ought to be abolished.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2215 | 565 | 60 |
Full Text Views | 477 | 129 | 13 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 691 | 250 | 33 |