Save

Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Cassandra Aebersold RDepartment of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401

Search for other papers by Cassandra Aebersold in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luke Galen Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, 2139 AuSable Hall, Allendale, MI 49401

Search for other papers by Luke Galen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Victoria Stanton Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401

Search for other papers by Victoria Stanton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jamie DeLeeuw Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401

Search for other papers by Jamie DeLeeuw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship among religious denomination, fundamentalism, belief about human origins, gender, and support for animal rights. Eighty-two college undergraduates filled out a set of 3 questionnaires: The Religious Fundamentalism Scale (Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 2004), beliefs about human origins (creationism, intelligent design, or evolution), and the Animal Rights Scale (Wuensch, Jenkins, & Poteat, 2002). Because conservative Protestants and fundamentalists adhere to religious doctrine that espouses a discontinuity between humans and other species, the study predicted they would have lower support for animal rights. Further, proponents of evolution—who tend to view species as interconnected—would advocate animal rights more so than creationists and believers of intelligent design theory. Results supported the hypotheses. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the religious variables and gender were significant in predicting support for animal rights.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 915 178 32
Full Text Views 214 26 9
PDF Views & Downloads 232 51 17