This is a rebuttal to Fiona Probyn-Rapsey’s criticisms of the original furry research conducted in 2006 and published in 2008. Her focus on gender identity disorder misses the main point of the study, which was that it was the first empirical study to collect data scientifically and report findings on the furry fandom, an often misrepresented subculture.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1075 | 213 | 21 |
Full Text Views | 219 | 11 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 251 | 28 | 9 |
This is a rebuttal to Fiona Probyn-Rapsey’s criticisms of the original furry research conducted in 2006 and published in 2008. Her focus on gender identity disorder misses the main point of the study, which was that it was the first empirical study to collect data scientifically and report findings on the furry fandom, an often misrepresented subculture.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1075 | 213 | 21 |
Full Text Views | 219 | 11 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 251 | 28 | 9 |