The majority of research investigating beliefs toward nonhuman animals has focused on vivisection or utilized populations with clear views on animal issues (e.g., animal rights activists). Minimal research has been conducted on what personality factors influence a nonclinical or nonadjudicated population’s beliefs about the treatment of animals. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of empathy and personality traits in attitudes about the treatment of animals in 241 undergraduate students. Results indicated that those with high levels of empathy held more positive attitudes toward animals and more negative beliefs about animal cruelty than those with low levels of empathy. Some differences in participants’ specific attitudes toward animals were found. Limitations and implications for future research are reviewed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Agnew R. The causes of animal abuse: A social-psychological analysis Theoretical Criminology 1998 2 2 177 209
Allport G. W. The nature of prejudice 1954 Reading, MA Addison-Wesley
Alterman A. I. , McDermott P. A. , Cacciola J. S. & Rutherford M. J. Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2003 25 4 257 265
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to animals Teen kills kitten in oven; faces 10-year sentence News Alert: June 12, 2009 2009 Retrieved July 2, 2009, from http://www.aspca.org/News/National/National-News-Detail.aspx?NDate=20090612&NType=National#News1
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 2000 4th ed. Washington, DC Author
Baldry A. animal abuse among preadolescents directly and indirectly victimized at school and at home Criminal Behavior and Mental Health 2005 15 2 97 110
Bem S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing Psychological Review 1981 88 4 354 364
Boat B. W. Ascione F.R. & Arkow P. Abuse of children and abuse of animals: Using the links to inform child assessment and protection Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse: Linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention 1999 West Lafayette, IN Purdue University Press 83 100
Broida J. P. , Tingley L. , Kimball R. & Miele J. Personality differences between pro and antivivisectionists Society & animals 1993 1 2 129 144
Cattell R. B. , Eber H. W. & Tatsuoka M. M. Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire 1970 Champaign, IL Institute for Personality Ability Testing
Cohen J. A power primer Psychological Bulletin 1992 112 1 155 159
Costa P. T. Jr. & McCrae R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI): Professional manual 1992 Odessa, FL Psychological Assessment Resources
Crowne D. P. & Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960 24 4 349 354
Davis M. H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 1980 10 85
Davis M. H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983 44 1 113 126
Devito A. J. Mitchell J. V. Review of Myers-Briggs type indicator The ninth mental measurements yearbook 1985 Lincoln University of Nebraska Press 1030 1032
Engler B. Personality theories 2003 Boston Houghton Mifflin
Goldberg L. R. Mervielde I., Deary I., De Fruyt F. & Ostendorf F. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models Personality psychology in Europe 1999 Vol. 7 Tilburg, the Netherlands Tilburg University Press 7 28
Gupta M. Functional links between intimate partner violence and animal abuse: Personality features and representations of aggression Society & animals 2008 16 3 223 242
Gupta M. E. animal abuse and callousness: Predicting frequency and severity of partner-directed physical violence in men 2003 University of Georgia, Athens Unpublished master’s thesis
Gupta M. E. & Beach S. R. H. Aggression toward animals Scale 2001 Unpublished questionnaire
Henry B. C. The relationship between animal cruelty, delinquency, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals Society & animals, 12 2004 3 185 207
Henry B. C. Empathy, home environment, and attitudes toward animals in relation to animal abuse Anthrozoös 2006 19 1 17 34
Hensley C. & Tallichet S. E. animal cruelty motivations assessing demographic and situational influences Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2005 20 11 1429 1443
Hensley C. & Tallichet S. E. The effects of inmates’ self-reported childhood and adolescent animal cruelty: Motivations on the number of convictions for adults violent interpersonal crimes International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2008 52 2 175 184
Herzog H. A. Jr. , Betchart N. S. & Pittman R. Sex role identity and attitudes toward animals Anthrozoös 1991 4 3 184 192
Hills A.M. The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals Society & animals 1993 1 2 111 128
International Personality Item Pool A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences 2001 Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://ipip.ori.org/
Jory B. & Randour M. L. The AniCare model of treatment for animal abuse 1999 Washington Grove, MD Doris Day animal Foundation and Psychologists for the Ethical Treatment of animals
Matthews S. & Herzog H. A. Personality and attitudes toward the treatment of animals Society & animals 1997 5 2 169 175
McCrae R. R. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987 52 6 1258 1265
Pagani C. , Robustelli F. & Ascione F. R. Italian youths’ attitudes toward, and concern for, animals Anthrozoös 2007 20 3 275 293
Peterson R. A. On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis Journal of Consumer Research 2001 28 3 450 461
Pettigrew T. F. & Tropp L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 90 5 751 783
Phillips R. Suspected serial cat killer is under house arrest 2009 June 17 CNN.com/Crime. Retrieved July 2, 2009, from http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/17/florida.cat.killings/index.html
Randour M. L. , Krinsk S. & Wolf J. L. AniCare child: An assessment and treatment approach for childhood animal abuse 2002 Washington Grove, MD Psychologists for the Ethical Treatment of animals
Signal T. D. & Taylor N. Attitudes to animals: Demographics within a community sample Society & animals 2007 14 2 147 157
Takooshian H. Opinions on animal research: Scientists versus the public PsyETA Bulletin 1988 7 2 5 7
Taylor N. & Signal T. D. Empathy and attitudes toward animals Anthrozoös 2005 18 1 18 27
Twarowski C. & Bolger T. Sick puppies: Killers at large in Brentwood Long Island Press 2007 July 25 8 10 11
Wright J. & Hensley C. From animal cruelty to serial murder: Applying the graduation hypothesis International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2003 47 1 71 87
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2522 | 386 | 46 |
Full Text Views | 457 | 26 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 334 | 46 | 0 |
The majority of research investigating beliefs toward nonhuman animals has focused on vivisection or utilized populations with clear views on animal issues (e.g., animal rights activists). Minimal research has been conducted on what personality factors influence a nonclinical or nonadjudicated population’s beliefs about the treatment of animals. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of empathy and personality traits in attitudes about the treatment of animals in 241 undergraduate students. Results indicated that those with high levels of empathy held more positive attitudes toward animals and more negative beliefs about animal cruelty than those with low levels of empathy. Some differences in participants’ specific attitudes toward animals were found. Limitations and implications for future research are reviewed.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2522 | 386 | 46 |
Full Text Views | 457 | 26 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 334 | 46 | 0 |