“I Didn’t Feel Right About Animal Dissection”: Dissection Objectors Share Their Science Class Experiences

In: Society & Animals
Author: Jan Oakley 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Lakehead University, Canada

Abstract

This paper highlights the voices and experiences of individuals who objected to animal dissection in their high school science and biology classes. The data were collected via online surveys (n = 311), and 8 of these participants took part in more in-depth telephone interviews. Participants were former students from Ontario, Canada, who discussed their experiences with animal dissection in general, and objection to dissection in particular, if applicable. The findings reveal that students who expressed objection to dissection experienced a range of teacher responses, including pressure to participate, the request to join another group of students and watch, the choice to use a dissection alternative, warnings of compromised grades, and other responses. The study points to the importance of choice policies to ensure that dissection alternatives are available in classrooms. In this way, students can select among different options of how they would like to learn, and teachers can be prepared to accommodate those who choose not to dissect.

  • Almy J., Goldsmith M. & Patronek G. Dissection in Massachusetts classrooms: Correlation of gender, teacher attitudes, and conscientious objection 2001 West Barnstable, MA Cape Wildlife Center [Report]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) Vermont enacts student choice legislation! 2011 Retrieved October 3, 2011, from: http://www.aavs.org/site/c.bkLTKfOSLhK6E/ b.6453015/k.FCBD/Vermont_Enacts_Student_Choice_Legislation.htm [Press release]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balcombe J. The use of animals in higher education: Problems, alternatives, and recommendations 2000 Washington, D.C. The Humane Society Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balcombe J. Jukes N. & Chiuia M. Assessment of alternatives in education. From guinea pig to computer mouse: Alternative methods for a progressive, humane education 2003 2nd ed. Leicester InterNICHE 40 53

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barr G. & Herzog H. Fetal pig: The high school dissection experience Society & Animals 2000 8 1 53 69

  • Beauchamp T., Orlans F. B., Dresser R., Morton D. & Gluck J. The human use of animals: Case studies in ethical choice 2008 New York Oxford University Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capaldo T. The psychological effects on students of using animals in ways that they see as ethically, morally or religiously wrong Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 2004 32 1 525 531

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cunningham P. Animals in psychology education and student choice Society & Animals 2000 8 2 191 212

  • Duncan A. To dissect or not: Student choice-in-dissection laws ensure the freedom to choose Journal of Law and Education 2008 37 2 283 289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frogs Are Cool Campaigns 2011 Retrieved October 3, 2011, from: http://www.frogsarecool.com/campaigns.htm

  • Giroux H. Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. 2001 Westport, CT Begin & Garvey

  • Hagelin J., Carlsson H. & Hau J. An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science 2003 12 1 67 81

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hepner L. H. Animals in education: The facts, issues and implications 1994 Albuquerque, NM Richmond Publishers

  • Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) Comparative studies of dissection and other animal uses 2008 Retrieved October 3, 2011, from: http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/parents_educators/dissection_vs_alternatives_studies.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Humes B. Moving toward a liberatory pedagogy for all species: Mapping the need for dialogue between humane and anti-oppressive education. Green Theory and Practice: A Journal of Ecopedagogy 2008 4 1 65 85

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jukes N. & Chiuia M. From guinea pig to computer mouse: Alternative methods for a progressive, humane education 2003 2nd ed Leicester InterNICHE

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • King L. A., Ross C. L., Stephens M. L. & Rowan A. N. Biology teachers’ attitudes to dissection and alternatives. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 2004 32 1 475 484

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kopec R. H. Virtual, on-line, frog dissection vs. conventional laboratory dissection: A comparison of student achievement and teacher perceptions among honors, general ability, and foundations-level high school biology classes 2002 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3040985)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kramer M. G. Humane education, dissection, and the law Animal Law 2007 13 281 298

  • Lalley J. P., Piotrowski P. S., Battaglia B., Brophy K. & Chugh K. A comparison of V-Frog to physical frog dissection International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2010 5 2 189 200

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maloney R. Exploring virtual fetal pig dissection as a learning tool for female high school biology students Educational Research and Evaluation 2005 11 6 591 603

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLaren P. Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education 1998 New York Longman

  • Millett K. & Lock R. GCSE students’ attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teachers Journal of Biological Education 1992 26 3 204 208

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moir T. G. Attitudes towards dissection: Student/teacher conflict over animal dissection 2000 (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 1405617)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montgomery L. A comparison of the effectiveness of virtual and traditional dissection on learning frog anatomy in high school 2008 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3287762)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oakley J. Cutting edge controversy: The politics of animal dissection and responses to student objection 2011 Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oakley J. Under the knife: Animal dissection as a contested school science activity Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education 2009 1 2 59 67

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] OSHA fact sheet: Formaldehyde. 2011 Retrieved December 11, 2011, from: http://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General_Facts/formaldehyde-factsheet.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ontario Ministry of Education The Ontario curriculum, Grades 9 and 10: Science 2008a Ontario Ontario Ministry of Education

  • Ontario Ministry of Education The Ontario curriculum, Grades 11 and 12: Science 2008b Ontario Ontario Ministry of Education

  • Ontario Software Acquisition Program Advisory Committee (OSAPAC) Froguts dissection software 2011 Retrieved October 3, 2011, from: http://www.osapac.org/db/view_software_tabs/details.php?id=373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orlans F. B. In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation 1993 New York Oxford University Press

  • Phillips C. J. & McCulloch S. Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society Journal of Biological Education 2005 40 1 17 24

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pifer L. K. Adolescents and animal research: Stable attitudes or ephemeral opinions? Public Understanding of Science 1994 3 3 291 307

  • Rosenberger J. Harvest of shame: Dissection’s deadly toll hits frogs hardest E Magazine 1998 July/August 9 4 26 27

  • Sapontzis S. F. We should not allow dissection of animals Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1995 8 2 181 189

  • Sieber J. Students’ and scientists’ attitudes on animal research. The American Biology Teacher 1986 48 2 85 91

  • Solot D. & Arluke A. Learning the scientist’s role: Animal dissection in middle school. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1997 26 1 28 54

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Underwood D., Kim H. & Matier M. To mail or to web: Comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH. 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weil Z. The power and promise of humane education 2004 Gabriola Island, BC New Society Publishers

  • Youngblut C. Use of multimedia technology to provide solutions to existing curriculum problems: Virtual frog dissection 2001 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3008579)

    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 665 526 35
Full Text Views 94 21 0
PDF Downloads 24 7 0