Animal Publics: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Political Life

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

To what extent do non-human animals participate in that particular political configuration known as a public? While conventional wisdom about publics is predicated on a vision of political agency that privileges discursive and deliberative processes, recent scholarship situated in the material turn in the social sciences and humanities challenges the notion that publics are purely human and constituted exclusively through language. With these theorizations as a backdrop, this paper takes into consideration the multiple species that are implicated in political life and that play a role in constituting publics. Placing material definitions of publics in line with central concerns raised by human-animal studies, it is argued that animality is significant to publics in ways that have yet to be sufficiently theorized. The intent of this research is to invite further investigation of the myriad ways in which animal bodies and lives influence public formations in a manner that accounts for and also exceeds human capacity for symbolic communication.

Animal Publics: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Political Life

in Society & Animals

Sections

References

BinghamN. Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: Biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship Environment & Planning A 2006 38 3 483 498

BraunB.WhatmoreS. Political matter: Technoscience democracy and public life 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press

Bird RoseD. Cosmopolitics: The kiss of life New Formations 2012 76 101 113

BrownM. Science in democracy: Expertise institutions and representation. 2009 Cambridge, MA, and London, United Kingdom MIT Press

DerridaJ. The animal that therefore I am (more to follow) Critical Inquiry 2002 28 2 369 418

DerridaJ.MalletM. The animal that therefore I am. 2008 New York, NY Fordham University Press

DeweyJ. The public and its problems 1927 Athens, OH Ohio University Press

Dillard-WrightD. Thinking across species boundaries: general sociality and embodied meaning Society & Animals 2009 17 53 71

EckersleyR. Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach 1992 New York, NY State University of New York Press

ElderG.WolchJ.EmelJ. Race, place and the bounds of humanity Society & Animals 1998 6 2 183 202

HabermasJ. BurgerT. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society 1989 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

HarawayD. GrossbergL.NelsonC.TreichlerP. The promises of monsters Cultural studies 1992 London, United Kingdom, and New York, NY Routledge

HarawayD. The companion species manifesto: dogs people and significant otherness 2003 Chicago, IL Prickly Paradigm Press

HarawayD. When species meet 2008 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press

HobsonK. Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography Political Geography 2007 26 3 250 267

IngoldT. Rethinking the animate, reanimating thought Ethnos 2006 71 1 9 20

LatourB. PorterC. We have never been modern 1993 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

LatourB. PorterC. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy 2004 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

LatourB. LatourB.WeibelP. From realpolitik to dingpolitik—or how to make things public Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy 2005 Boston, MA MIT Press

LorimerH. Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’ Progress in Human Geography 2005 29 83 94

MarresN. LatourB.WeibelP. Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippman-Dewey debate Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy 2005 Boston, MA MIT Press

MarresN. BraunB.WhatmoreS. J. Front-staging nonhumans: Publicity as a constraint on the political activity of things Political matter: Technoscience democracy and public life 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press

MarresN.LezaunJ. Materials and devices of the public: An introduction Economy & Society 2011 40 4 489 509

MichaelM. Technoscientific bespoking: Animals, publics and the new genetics New Genetics and Society 2001 20 3 205 224

MichaelM. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: heterogeneity and the public understanding of science Science Technology & Human Values 2002 27 3 357 378

MichaelM. Roadkill: Between humans, nonhuman animals and technologies Society & Animals 2004 12 4 277 297

PetersJ. GlasserT.SalmonC. Historical tensions in the concept of public opinion Public opinion and the communication of consent 1995 New York, NY The Guilford Press

RasmussenC. The autonomous animal: Self governance and the modern subject 2011 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota

SpiegelM. The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery 1997 New York, NY Mirror

ThriftN. Non-representational theory: Space politics affect 2008 London, United Kingdom, and New York, NY Routledge

WarnerM. Publics and counterpublics Public Culture 2002 14 49 90

WeilK. A report on the animal turn Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 2010 21 2 1 23

WeilK. Thinking animals: Why animal studies now 2012 New York, NY Columbia University Press

WhatmoreS. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces 2002 London, United Kingdom Sage

WolfeC. Human, all too human: “Animal studies” and the humanities PMLA 2009 124 2 564 575

WolfeC. What is posthumanism? 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 40 40 18
Full Text Views 77 77 41
PDF Downloads 7 7 5
EPUB Downloads 2 2 2