Animal Publics: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Political Life
In: Society & AnimalsTo what extent do non-human animals participate in that particular political configuration known as a public? While conventional wisdom about publics is predicated on a vision of political agency that privileges discursive and deliberative processes, recent scholarship situated in the material turn in the social sciences and humanities challenges the notion that publics are purely human and constituted exclusively through language. With these theorizations as a backdrop, this paper takes into consideration the multiple species that are implicated in political life and that play a role in constituting publics. Placing material definitions of publics in line with central concerns raised by human-animal studies, it is argued that animality is significant to publics in ways that have yet to be sufficiently theorized. The intent of this research is to invite further investigation of the myriad ways in which animal bodies and lives influence public formations in a manner that accounts for and also exceeds human capacity for symbolic communication.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bingham N. Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: Biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship Environment & Planning A 2006 38 3 483 498
-
Braun B. & Whatmore S. Political matter: Technoscience, democracy and public life 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
-
Bird Rose D. Cosmopolitics: The kiss of life New Formations 2012 76 101 113
-
Brown M. Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. 2009 Cambridge, MA, and London, United Kingdom MIT Press
-
Derrida J. The animal that therefore I am (more to follow) Critical Inquiry 2002 28 2 369 418
-
Derrida J. & Mallet M. The animal that therefore I am. 2008 New York, NY Fordham University Press
-
Dewey J. The public and its problems 1927 Athens, OH Ohio University Press
-
Dillard-Wright D. Thinking across species boundaries: general sociality and embodied meaning Society & Animals 2009 17 53 71
-
Eckersley R. Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach 1992 New York, NY State University of New York Press
-
Elder G., Wolch J. & Emel J. Race, place and the bounds of humanity Society & Animals 1998 6 2 183 202
-
Habermas J. Burger T. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society 1989 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
-
Haraway D. Grossberg L., Nelson C. & Treichler P. The promises of monsters Cultural studies 1992 London, United Kingdom, and New York, NY Routledge
-
Haraway D. The companion species manifesto: dogs, people and significant otherness 2003 Chicago, IL Prickly Paradigm Press
-
Haraway D. When species meet 2008 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
-
Hobson K. Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography Political Geography 2007 26 3 250 267
-
Ingold T. Rethinking the animate, reanimating thought Ethnos 2006 71 1 9 20
-
Latour B. Porter C. We have never been modern 1993 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
-
Latour B. Porter C. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy 2004 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
-
Latour B. Latour B. & Weibel P. From realpolitik to dingpolitik—or how to make things public Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy 2005 Boston, MA MIT Press
-
Lorimer H. Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’ Progress in Human Geography 2005 29 83 94
-
Marres N. Latour B. & Weibel P. Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippman-Dewey debate Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy 2005 Boston, MA MIT Press
-
Marres N. Braun B. & Whatmore S. J. Front-staging nonhumans: Publicity as a constraint on the political activity of things Political matter: Technoscience, democracy and public life 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
-
Marres N. & Lezaun J. Materials and devices of the public: An introduction Economy & Society 2011 40 4 489 509
-
Michael M. Technoscientific bespoking: Animals, publics and the new genetics New Genetics and Society 2001 20 3 205 224
-
Michael M. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: heterogeneity and the public understanding of science Science, Technology, & Human Values 2002 27 3 357 378
-
Michael M. Roadkill: Between humans, nonhuman animals and technologies Society & Animals 2004 12 4 277 297
-
Peters J. Glasser T. & Salmon C. Historical tensions in the concept of public opinion Public opinion and the communication of consent 1995 New York, NY The Guilford Press
-
Rasmussen C. The autonomous animal: Self governance and the modern subject 2011 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota
-
Spiegel M. The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery 1997 New York, NY Mirror
-
Thrift N. Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect 2008 London, United Kingdom, and New York, NY Routledge
-
Warner M. Publics and counterpublics Public Culture 2002 14 49 90
-
Weil K. A report on the animal turn Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 2010 21 2 1 23
-
Weil K. Thinking animals: Why animal studies now 2012 New York, NY Columbia University Press
-
Whatmore S. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces 2002 London, United Kingdom Sage
-
Wolfe C. Human, all too human: “Animal studies” and the humanities PMLA 2009 124 2 564 575
-
Wolfe C. What is posthumanism? 2010 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 404 | 146 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 172 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 39 | 11 | 0 |
Animal Publics: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Political Life
In: Society & AnimalsTo what extent do non-human animals participate in that particular political configuration known as a public? While conventional wisdom about publics is predicated on a vision of political agency that privileges discursive and deliberative processes, recent scholarship situated in the material turn in the social sciences and humanities challenges the notion that publics are purely human and constituted exclusively through language. With these theorizations as a backdrop, this paper takes into consideration the multiple species that are implicated in political life and that play a role in constituting publics. Placing material definitions of publics in line with central concerns raised by human-animal studies, it is argued that animality is significant to publics in ways that have yet to be sufficiently theorized. The intent of this research is to invite further investigation of the myriad ways in which animal bodies and lives influence public formations in a manner that accounts for and also exceeds human capacity for symbolic communication.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 404 | 146 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 172 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 39 | 11 | 0 |