Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Hunting has a long history, and contentious recent past. We examined the relationship between aggression and hunting attitudes, investigating the moderating role of sex. Two studies are presented—a psychometric evaluation of a unidimensional instrument for assessing hunting attitudes, which was then administered to a sample of general population participants to assess the relationship between aggression and hunting attitudes. Finally, university students completed measures of hunting attitudes and instrumental/expressive aggression. Men were more instrumentally aggressive than women and were more supportive toward hunting. The relationship between instrumental (but not expressive) aggression and hunting attitudes was moderated by sex—men’s hunting endorsement increased with instrumental aggression, while women’s endorsement of hunting decreased with increasing instrumental aggression. Expressive aggression was not predictive of hunting attitudes.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adams C. J. The sexual politics of meat 1990 Cambridge, MA Polity Press
Adams C. J. Neither man nor beast 1994 New York, NY Continuum
Allen M. W. , Wilson M. S. , Ng S. H. & Dunne M. Values, beliefs and meat consumption: The values of omnivores and vegetarians Journal of Social Psychology 2000 140 4 405 422
Amato P. R. & Partridge S. A. The new vegetarians: Promoting health and protecting life 1989 New York, NY Plenum Press
Anderson C. A. & Bushman B. J. Human aggression Annual Review of Psychology 2002 53 27 51
Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review Psychological Bulletin 2000 126 651 680
Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review Review of General Psychology 2004 8 291 322
Archer J. & Haigh A. Do beliefs about aggressive feelings and actions predict reported levels of aggression? British Journal of Social Psychology 1997a 36 83 105
Archer J. & Haigh A. Beliefs about aggression among male and female prisoners Aggressive Behavior 1997b 23 405 415
Astin S. , Redston P. & Campbell A. Sex differences in social representations of aggression: Men justify, women excuse? Aggressive Behavior 2003 29 128 133
Baron R. & Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986 51 1173 1182
Bauer J. & Giles J. Recreational hunting: An international perspective 2002 Gold Coast, Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism (Wildlife Tourism Research Report Series No. 13)
Bem S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974 42 155 162
Bird R. B. , Smith E. A. & Bird D. W. The hunting handicap: Costly signaling in human foraging strategies Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 2001 50 9 19
Buss A. H. & Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992 63 254 459
Campbell A. & Muncer S. Models of anger and aggression in the social talk of women and men Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1987 17 489 512
Campbell A. , Muncer S. & Coyle E. Social representations of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study Aggressive Behavior 1992 18 95 108
Campbell A. , Muncer S. , Guy A. & Banim M. Social representations of aggression: Crossing the sex barrier European Journal of Social Psychology 1996 26 135 147
Cashmore E. Making sense of sports 2005 4th ed. New York, NY Routledge
Causey A. On the morality of hunting Environmental Ethics 1989 11 334 335
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Copp J. D. Why hunters like to hunt Psychology Today 1975 9 7 60 62 67
Driscoll H. , Zinkivskay A. , Evans K. & Campbell A. Gender differences in social representation of aggression: The phenomenological experience of differences in inhibitory control? British Journal of Psychology 2006 97 139 153
Dunlap R. E. , Van Liere K. D. , Mertig A. G. & Jones R. E. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale Journal of Social Issues 2000 56 425 442
Evans R. , Gauthier D. K. & Forsyth C. J. Dogfighting: Symbolic expression and validation of masculinity Sex Roles 1998 39 825 838
Flynn C. P. Hunting and illegal violence against humans and other animals: Exploring the relationship Society & Animals 2002 10 2 137 154
Fossati A. , Maffei C. , Acquarini E. & Di Ceglie A. Multigroup confirmatory component and factor analyses of the Italian version of the Aggression Questionnaire European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2003 19 54 65
Fromm E. The anatomy of human destructiveness 1973 New York, NY Holt, Rhinehart & Winston
Giles D. C. Advanced research methods in psychology 2002 New York, NY Routledge
Groome K. H. , Simons D. G. & Clark L. D. The recreational hunter: Central North Island study 1983 Lincoln, New Zealand Department of Horticulture, Landscapes and Parks, Lincoln College
Hagelin J. , Carlsson H. & Hau J. An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome Public Understanding of Science 2003 12 67 81
Henrich J. , Heine S. J. & Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010 33 61 135
Herzog H. A. Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review Anthrozoös 2007 20 7 21
Hughey K. F. D. , Kerr G. N. & Cullen R. Public perceptions of New Zealand’s environment: 2008 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand EOS Ecology
Irwin P. G. Salem D. J. & Rowan A. N. Overview: The state of the animals in 2001 The state of the animals 2001 2001 Washington, DC Humane Society Press 1 19
Jose P. E. ModGraph-I: A programme to compute cell means for the graphical display of moderational analyses: The internet version, Version 3.0 2013 Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved February 13, 2014, from http://pavlov.psyc.vuw.ac.nz/paul-jose/modgraph/
Kalof L. Looking at animals in human history 2007 London, United Kingdom Reaktion Books Ltd
Keeler L. A. The differences in sport aggression, life aggression, and life assertion among adult male and female collision, and non-contact sport athletes Journal of Sport Behavior 2007 30 1 57 76
Kellert S. R. Japanese perceptions of wildlife Conservation Biology 1991 5 3 297 308
Kellert S. R. & Berry J. K. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender Wildlife Society Bulletin 1987 15 3 363 371
Kheel M. The killing game: An ecofeminist critique of hunting Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 1996 23 30 44
Kirsta D. Deadlier than the male 1994 London, United Kingdom Harper Collins
Lauber T. B. & Brown T. L. Deer hunting and deer hunting trends in New York State 2000 Ithaca, NY Cornell University (hdru series, No. 00-1, Department of Natural Resources)
Lovelock B. International and domestic visitors’ attitudes as constraints to hunting tourism in New Zealand Journal of Sport Tourism 2003 8 197 203
Luke B. A critical analysis of hunters’ ethics Environmental Ethics 1997 19 25 44
Luke B. Brutal: Manhood and the exploitation of animals 2007 Urbana and Chicago, IL University of Illinois Press
Moffitt T. E. , Caspi A. , Rutter M. & Silva P. Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study 2001 Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press
Plous S. An attitude survey of animal rights activists Psychological Science 1991 2 194 196
Ramirez J. M. , Andreu J. M. & Fujihara T. Cultural and sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories Aggressive Behavior 2001 27 313 322
Responsive Management/National Shooting Sports Foundation The future of hunting and the shooting sports: Research-based recruitment and retention strategies 2008 Harrisonburg, VA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Rohner R. P. Sex Differences in aggression: Phylogenetic and enculturation perspectives Ethos 1976 4 1 57 72
Schuller C. A. Killing for sport: A critical analysis of recreational hunting in Australia 1998 Sydney, Australia Macquarie University
Sears D. O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986 51 515 530
Sharp R. & Wollscheid K. Dickson B. , Hutton J. & Adams W. An overview of recreational hunting in North America, Europe and Australia Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods 2009 Oxford, United Kingdom Wiley-Blackwell
Shaw W. W. A survey of hunting opponents Wildlife Society Bulletin 1977 5 1 19 24
Spence J. T. , Helmreich R. L. & Stapp J. The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 1974 4 43
Tremblay P. F. & Ewart L. A. The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies Perssonality and Individual Differences 2004 38 337 346
United States Census Bureau Statistical abstract of the United States 2004-2005 124th ed. Washington, DC US Department of Commerce
von Collani G. & Werner R. Self-related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression: An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire Personality & Individual Differences 2005 38 1631 1643
Woods A. & Kerr G. N. Recreational game hunting: Motivations, satisfactions and participation 2010 Lincoln, New Zealand Lincoln University (Land Environment and People Research Report No. 18)
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1083 | 474 | 32 |
Full Text Views | 232 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 14 | 0 |
Hunting has a long history, and contentious recent past. We examined the relationship between aggression and hunting attitudes, investigating the moderating role of sex. Two studies are presented—a psychometric evaluation of a unidimensional instrument for assessing hunting attitudes, which was then administered to a sample of general population participants to assess the relationship between aggression and hunting attitudes. Finally, university students completed measures of hunting attitudes and instrumental/expressive aggression. Men were more instrumentally aggressive than women and were more supportive toward hunting. The relationship between instrumental (but not expressive) aggression and hunting attitudes was moderated by sex—men’s hunting endorsement increased with instrumental aggression, while women’s endorsement of hunting decreased with increasing instrumental aggression. Expressive aggression was not predictive of hunting attitudes.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1083 | 474 | 32 |
Full Text Views | 232 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 14 | 0 |