Adolescents are the next generation of consumers with the potential to raise standards of farm animal welfare—to their satisfaction—if their preferences and concerns are translated into accurate market drivers and signals. There are no published data about adolescent views of farm animal welfare to allow meaningful design, implementation, and evaluation of educational strategies to improve consideration of—and behavior toward—farm animals. Knowledge of farm animal welfare, as well as beliefs and attitudes about farm animal welfare and behavioral intention relevant to it were determined in a sample of uk adolescents, using a survey incorporating an extended version of the theory of planned behavior and novel assessment tools. Our results indicate that adolescents have only a limited knowledge of welfare problems for farm animals and welfare-relevant product labels. Intentions to identify welfare standards for the animals from whom their food was derived were weak. Although they cared about farm animal welfare and agreed with fundamental principles—for example, the provision of space and the absence of pain and suffering—like adults they held limited belief in the power and responsibility that they possess through their choices as consumers; responsibility was often shifted to others, such as the government and farmers.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991 50 2 179 211
Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002 32 4 665 683
Ajzen I. & Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980 Edinburgh, Scotland Pearson Education
Austin E. J., Deary I. J., Edwards-Jones G. & Dale A. Attitudes to farm animal welfare Journal of Individual Differences 2005 26 3 107 120
Bennett R. Farm animal welfare and food policy Food Policy 1997 22 4 281 288
Bennett R. M. People’s willingness to pay for farm animal welfare Animal Welfare 1996 5 1 3 11
Brooke P. Pig Welfare. Towards shared priorities for the future rac/pic 2007 Pig Fellowship Report 2008 Retrieved from http://www.ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/20080/p/pigwelfarenpapositionpaper2008.pdf
Central Intelligence Agency The world factbook: United Kingdom 2011 Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uk.html
Cohen J. W. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Coleman G. J., McGregor M., Hemsworth P. H., Boyce J. & Dowling S. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2003 82 3 189 200
DeRosa B. Children’s attitudes toward farm animals Children & Animals 1987 11 3 Retrieved from http://www.rvc.ac.uk/Research/Groups/CAW/documents/DeRosa1987.pdf
Ellis C. & Irvine L. Reproducing dominion: Emotional apprenticeship in the 4-H youth livestock program Society & Animals 2010 18 1 21 39
European Commission Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals 2005 Special EU Barometer Report, 229 Brussels, Belgium European Commission 1 73
European Commission Attitudes of eu citizens towards animal welfare 2007 Special Eurobarometer Report, 270 Brussels, Belgium European Commission 1 51
European Commission 2010 Proceedings of the International Conference on Animal Welfare Education: Everyone is Responsible Brussels, Belgium Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/seminars/docs/2010100102_proceedings.pdf
Farm Animal Welfare Committee Education, communication and knowledge application in relation to farm animal welfare 2011a London, United Kingdom Farm Animal Welfare Committee Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/fawc/files/Report-on-Education-Communication-and-Knowledge-Application-in-Relation-to-Farm-Animal-Welfare.pdf
Farm Animal Welfare Committee Economics and farm animal welfare 2011b London, United Kingdom Farm Animal Welfare Committee Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/fawc/files/Report-on-Economics-and-Farm-Animal-Welfare.pdf
Farm Animal Welfare Council Report on the welfare implications of farm assurance schemes 2005 London, United Kingdom Farm Animal Welfare Council Retrieved from http://www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/fas-report05.pdf
Farm Animal Welfare Council Report on welfare labelling 2006 London, United Kingdom Farm Animal Welfare Council Retrieved from http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports/welfarelabel-0606.pdf
Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
George D. & Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update 2003 4th ed. Boston, MA Allyn & Bacon
GfK [Growth from Knowledge] Social Research Public attitudes to food 2009 Food Standards Agency. Retrieved from http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/publicattitudestofood.pdf
Gliem J. & Gliem R. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales 2003 October Presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education Ohio State University, Columbus Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344
Harper G. & Henson S. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice 2001 Reading, United Kingdom The University of Reading European Commission’s fair programme
Heleski C. R., Mertig A. G. & Zanella A. J. Stakeholder attitudes toward farm animal welfare Anthrozoös: A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people and animals 2006 19 4 290 307
Herzog H. A. Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review Anthrozoös: A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people and animals 2007 20 1 7 21
Herzog H. A., Betchart N. S. & Pittman R. B. Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals Anthrozoös: A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people and animals 1991 4 3 184 191
Hills A. M. The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals Society & Animals 1993 1 2 111 128
Institute of Grocery Distribution Consumer attitudes to animal welfare 2007 A Report for Freedom Food by igd. Retrieved from http://www.rspca.org.uk/servlet/Satellite?blobcol=urlblob&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=RSPCABlob&blobwhere=1172248207766&ssbinary=true&Content-Type=application/pdf
Izmirli S. & Phillips C. J. C. The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia British Food Journal 2011 113 3 436 450
Jacobsen E. & Dulsrud A. Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2007 20 5 469 482
Jamieson J., Reiss M. J., Allen D., Asher L., Wathes C. M. & Abeyesinghe S. M. Measuring the success of a farm animal welfare education event Animal Welfare 2012 21 1 65 75
Kauppinen T., Vainio A., Valros A., Rita H. & Vesala K. M. Improving animal welfare: Qualitative and quantitative methodology in the study of farmers’ attitudes Animal Welfare 2010 19 4 523 536
Kendall H. A., Lobao L. M. & Sharp J. S. Public Concern with Animal Well-Being: Place, Social Structural Location, and Individual Experience Rural Sociology 2006 71 3 399 428
Kjærnes U. & Lavik R. Kjærnes U., Bock B. B., Roe E. & Roex J. Opinions on animal welfare and food consumption in seven European countries Consumption, distribution and production of farm animal welfare. Welfare Quality Reports No. 7 2008 Cardiff, Wales Cardiff University 3 117
Köhler F. & Wickenhäuser M. Strategies to address consumer concerns about animal welfare Report written for the research project eu fair-ct98-3678. Consumer Concerns about Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice 2001 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/survey/de_fair_focus%20groups%20rep_en.pdf
Lawrence A. B. & Stott A. W. Goby L. Animal welfare and profitable farming: Getting the best of both worlds 3rd Boehringer Ingelheim Expert Forum on Farm Animal Well-Being 2010 Barcelona, Spain Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health GmbH 61 64 Available at http://www.farmanimalwellbeing.eu/files/article_10.pdf.
Lotrean L. M., Dijk F., Mesters I., Ionut C. & De Vries H. Evaluation of a peer-led smoking prevention programme for Romanian adolescents Health Education Research 2010 25 5 803 814
Mayfield L., Bennett R. & Tranter R. Evans A. & Miele M. United Kingdom Consumers’ Views about Farm Animal Welfare: National Reports based on Focus Group Research 2007a Part 1 Cardiff, Wales Cardiff University 115 154 Welfare Quality Reports No. 4
Mayfield L. E., Bennett R. M., Tranter R. B. & Wooldridge M. J. Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 2007b 15 3 59 73
McEachern M. G. & Schröder M. J. A. The role of livestock production ethics in consumer values towards meat Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2002 15 2 221 237
Miele M. Report concerning consumer perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare Official Experts Report eawp 2010 Uppsala, Sweden Uppsala University (task 1.3)
Miele M. & Bock B. Competing discourses of farm animal welfare and agri-food restructuring International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 2007 15 3 1 7
Miele M. & Evans A. When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care–Full practices of consumption Ethics, Place & Environment 2010 2 171 190
Miele M., Veissier I., Evans A. & Botreau R. Animal welfare: Establishing a dialogue between science and society Animal Welfare 2011 20 1 103 117
Muldoon J., Williams J., Lawrence A., Lakestani N. & Currie C. Promoting a “Duty of Care” towards animals among children and young people: A literature review and findings from initial research to inform the development of interventions 2009 Retrieved from http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/cahru/publications/reports_downloads/Defra_Yr1Report_Sep09.pdf.
Murray J. K., Browne W. J., Roberts M. A., Whitmarsh A. & Gruffydd-Jones T. J. Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the uk Veterinary Record 2010 166 6 163 168
Office for National Statistics Population estimates for uk, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, mid-2010 population estimates 2010 Data range 01 July 2009-30 June 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-231847.
Paul E. S. & Serpell J. A. Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood Animal Welfare 1993 2 4 321 337
Pet Food Manufacturers Association Pet population 2011. 2011 Retrieved from http://www.pfma.org.uk/pet-population-2011/.
Phillips C., Izmirli S., Aldavood J., Alonso M., Choe B., Hanlon A. & Rehn T. An International Comparison of Female and Male Students Attitudes to the Use of Animals Animals 2011 1 1 7 26
Phillips C. J. C. & McCulloch S. Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society Journal of Biological Education 2005 40 1 17 24
Porter S. R. & Whitcomb M. E. Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement and personality Research in Higher Education 2005 46 2 127 152
Prokop P. & Tunnicliffe S. D. Effects of having pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals Anthrozoös: A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions of people and animals 2010 23 1 21 35
Ransom E. The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 2007 15 3 26 44
Regmi A. & Gehlhar M. Consumer preferences and concerns shape global food trade Food Review: Global Food Trade 2001 24 3 2 8
Rudman L. A. Sources of implicit attitudes Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004 13 2 79 82
Russell-Bennett R. & Golledge A. H. An investigation of cross-cultural differences in binge-drinking perceptions and behaviours 2009 Proceedings of Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference Melbourne, Australia
Schroder M. J. A. & McEachern M. G. Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: A focus on animal welfare International Journal of Consumer Studies 2004 28 2 168 177
Shrigley R. L. Attitude and behavior are correlates Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1990 27 2 97 113
Sprint Media Ltd. Sprint Mail Intelligent Marketing to Schools and Teachers Retrieved from http://www.sprint-mail.co.uk/.
Te Velde H., Aarts N. & Van Woerkum C. Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2002 15 2 203 219
Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W., Van Poucke E. & Tuyttens F. A. M. Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 2007 15 3 91 107
Verbeke W. Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare Animal Welfare 2009 18 4 325 333
Vermeir I. & Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values Ecological Economics 2008 64 3 542 553
Wallace D. S., Paulson R. M., Lord C. G. & Bond C. F. Jr. Which behaviors do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty Review of General Psychology 2005 9 3 214 227
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1552 | 186 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 333 | 28 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 171 | 54 | 4 |
Adolescents are the next generation of consumers with the potential to raise standards of farm animal welfare—to their satisfaction—if their preferences and concerns are translated into accurate market drivers and signals. There are no published data about adolescent views of farm animal welfare to allow meaningful design, implementation, and evaluation of educational strategies to improve consideration of—and behavior toward—farm animals. Knowledge of farm animal welfare, as well as beliefs and attitudes about farm animal welfare and behavioral intention relevant to it were determined in a sample of uk adolescents, using a survey incorporating an extended version of the theory of planned behavior and novel assessment tools. Our results indicate that adolescents have only a limited knowledge of welfare problems for farm animals and welfare-relevant product labels. Intentions to identify welfare standards for the animals from whom their food was derived were weak. Although they cared about farm animal welfare and agreed with fundamental principles—for example, the provision of space and the absence of pain and suffering—like adults they held limited belief in the power and responsibility that they possess through their choices as consumers; responsibility was often shifted to others, such as the government and farmers.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1552 | 186 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 333 | 28 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 171 | 54 | 4 |