Save

The Economics of the Right to Keep a Dog

A Case Study of a Private Housing Complex in Hong Kong

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Yung Yau City University of Hong Kong y.yau@cityu.edu.hk

Search for other papers by Yung Yau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Shuk Man Chiu The University of Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Shuk Man Chiu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Dog guardianship has gained popularity in many cities as a result of animal domestication. In spite of its benefits, dog guardianship in high-density urban housing creates certain problems, including increased health risks. Conflicts between different interested parties over the right to keep dogs have therefore surfaced. In Hong Kong, a lawsuit was initiated by a resident in a private housing estate, Mei Foo Sun Chuen, to overturn dog bans imposed by the property management company. The court’s judgment stated that dog bans are enforceable only if dogs are explicitly prohibited in the deed of mutual covenant. This study aims to value empirically the right to keep dogs in private housing based on an analysis of a set of housing transaction data in Hong Kong. It also investigates how the value of the right has changed with the court judgment. The findings suggest that the right was negatively valued by the market, but the court judgment increased its value. These results demonstrate a revealed preference of the Hong Kong community for dog guardianship in a high-rise living environment.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 496 85 2
Full Text Views 202 10 4
PDF Views & Downloads 48 9 1