Save

Public Perceptions of Mental Capacities of Nonhuman Animals

Finnish Population Survey

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Saara Kupsala University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Department of Geographical and Historical Studies Joensuu Finland Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Environmental Policy Centre Helsinki Finland saara.kupsala@uef.fi

Search for other papers by Saara Kupsala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Markus Vinnari University of Tampere, School of Management Tampere Finland

Search for other papers by Markus Vinnari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pekka Jokinen University of Tampere, School of Management Tampere Finland

Search for other papers by Pekka Jokinen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Pekka Räsänen University of Turku, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Research Turku Finland

Search for other papers by Pekka Räsänen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Mental capacities are an essential basis on which people give moral concern to nonhuman animals. Hence, it is important to investigate public perceptions of animal mind and the factors underlying these perceptions. Although research into citizen beliefs in animal mind has been increasing, population-based studies utilizing multivariate methods have been scarce. In this article, public perceptions of animal mind are investigated with a nationwide survey in Finland (n = 1,824). Eight animal species positioned differently in cultural categorizations are included in the analysis. Dogs were ascribed the most capacities, followed by cows, pigs, wolves, and elk. Citizens expressed a low belief in the mental capacities of chicken, salmon, and shrimp. Classifying animals as companions, food, and threat influences the perceptions of animal mind. Young age, having a companion animal, valuing societal equality, and concern for animal welfare and for animal utilization are connected to a greater belief in animal mind.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 723 236 65
Full Text Views 301 31 4
PDF Views & Downloads 159 37 1