While animal welfare is commonly invoked in legal debates regarding non-human animals kept for food purposes, the concept of animal joy is rarely mentioned in such contexts. This paper analyzes the relationship between welfare and joy in the German animal protection law (gapl) and in the eu directive 98/58/ec. Based on a review of scientific and philosophical approaches towards animal welfare, joy is argued to be a part of welfare. Nevertheless, joy is ignored in the German and eu legal provisions. While there may be economic disadvantages of legally protecting animal joy, it is argued that overlooking elements of joy cannot be justified from any ethical perspective that claims to take animal welfare into consideration. In order to clarify the aims of the legal provisions, decision-makers need to define the role joy ought to play in welfare legislation.
BorkfeltS.KondrupS.RöcklinsbergR.BjørkdahlK.GjerrisM., 'Closer to nature? A critical discussion of the marketing of ‘‘ethical’’ animal products' (2015) 28(6) Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics: 1053-1073doi: 10.1007/s10806-015-9577-4..
LundmarkF.BergC.SchmidO.BehdadiD.RöcklinsbergH., 'Intentions and values in animal welfare legislation and standards' (2014) 27Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics: 991-1017doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9512-0..
WemelsfelderF., 'Animal boredom: understanding the tedium of confined lives', in F. D. MacMillan(ed), Mental health and well-being in animals, (Blackwell, Oxford2005) 79-91doi: 10.1002/9780470384947.ch6..