Save

Visualizing Human-Animal-Technology Relations

Field Notes, Still Photography, and Digital Video on the Robotic Dairy Farm

In: Society & Animals
View More View Less
  • 1 School of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, United Kingdombearck@cardiff.ac.uk
  • | 2 University Offices, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  • | 3 Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Hull, United Kingdom
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

This paper explores the potential for less anthropocentric approaches to researching human-nonhuman relations through visual ethnography, critically examining the conceptualization of nonhuman animals as participants. Arguing that method in animal studies has developed more slowly than theory, it proposes visual approaches as a way of foregrounding nonhuman animals’ behavior and actions in “social” research. Questioning the meaning of “participation,” this challenges underlying anthropocentric assumptions of visual ethnography. The paper presents a comparison of approaches used in studying sites, moments and movements of robotic milking on United Kingdom dairy farms: field notes, still photography, and digital video. While visual approaches are not a panacea for more-than-human research, we suggest that they offer a means through which nonhumans might “speak for themselves.” Rather than presenting definitive accounts, including video in such work also leaves the actions of nonhumans open to further interpretation, destabilizing the centrality of the researcher.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 942 243 11
Full Text Views 405 48 1
PDF Views & Downloads 171 62 2