In this review, we report the main discussions and concepts debated in the workshop “Animals and Politics: Explorations for a More-Than-Human Democracy,” the first academic event on animal studies in Chile. After a brief overview of the workshop, we summarize its results by identifying three broad conversations that cut across the workshop—borders, affects, and effects.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Agamben, G. (2004). The open: Man and animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 77.
Arendt, H.(1998). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, J. (2005). In parliament with things. In L. Tonder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between lack and abundance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress conservation: The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London and New York: Routledge.
Calarco, M. (2008). Zoographies: The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.
cnid – Consejo Nacional para la Inoovación y Desarrollo. (2017). Informe Evaluación de los Conflictos Socio-Ambientales de Proyectos de Gran Tamaño con Foco en Agua y Energía para el Periodo 1998 al 2015. Available at http://www.cnid.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Informe-final-CNID-Evaluacio%CC%81n-de-Conflictos-Socioambientales-1.pdf.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern Western world. London and New York: Routledge.
Critchley, S. (2007). Infinitely demanding: Ethics of commitment, politics of resistance. London and New York: Verso.
Derrida, J. (1995). ‘Eating well’, or the calculation of the subject. In Points … Interviews 1974–1994 (pp. 255–287). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J. (2002). The animal that therefore I am (more to follow). Critical Inquiry, 28(2), 369–418.
Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.
Diamond, C. (1978). Eating meat and eating people. Philosophy, 53(206), 465–479.
Diamond, C. (2003). The difficulty of reality and the difficulty of philosophy. Partial Answers, 1(2), 1–26.
Donaldson, S.,, & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (2010). The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy, 41(4), 464–480.
Halpern, D.(2007). Los puntos que no mide el rating. Cuadernos de Información, 20, 78–86.
Haraway, D. (2008). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness (second edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hobson, K. (2007). Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography. Political Geography, 26(3), 250–267. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.10.010.
Kateb, G. (2011). Human dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Latimer, J. (2013). Being alongside: Rethinking relations amongst different kinds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7–8), 77–104.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 911–932.
Marx, K. (1964). The economic & philosophic manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.
Massumi, B. (2014). What animals teach us about politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Medero, D.,, & Calder, A. (2003). Ethics, activism, and the rise of interdisciplinary animal studies: An interview with Cary Wolfe. Topia: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 39–52.
Meilaender, G. (2009). Neither beast nor god: The dignity of the human person. New York: Encounter Books.
Meillassoux, Q. (2009). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. London: Bloomsbury.
Milbank, J. (2013). Dignity rather than rights. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Understanding human dignity (pp. 189–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Milbank, J. (2014). Against human rights: The necessary quest for foundations. In C. Gearty & C. Douzinas (Eds.), The meanings of rights: The philosophy and social theory of human rights (pp. 39–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moyn, S. (2014). Human rights and the uses of history. London: Verso.
Moyn, S. (2015). The surprising origins of human dignity. In Christian human rights (pp. 25–64). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Oliver, K. (2009). Animal lessons: How they teach us to be human. New York: Columbia University Press.
Panagia, D.,, & Rancière, J. (2000). Dissenting words: A conversation with Jacques Rancière. Diacritics, 30(2), 113–126.
Phillips, A. (2015). The politics of the human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement. Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rancière, J. (2003). Comment and responses. Theory & Event, 6(4). doi: 10.1353/tae.2003.0017.
Ranciére, J. (2011). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. London, New York: Continuum.
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its history and meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Santner, E. (2006). On creaturely life: Benjamin, Rilke, Sebald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Santner, E. (2011). The royal remains: The people’s two bodies and the endgames of sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sepúlveda, C. (2016). Swans, ecological struggles and ontological fractures: A posthumanist account of the Río Cruces disaster in Valdivia, Chile. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia.
Sepúlveda, C.,, & Sundberg, J. (2015). Aperturas Ontológicas, Multiplicidad y Performación: Ampliando la Agenda de una Ecología Política Posthumanista a Partir de Reflexiones Sobre el Desastre del Río Cruces, en Valdivia. In B. Bustos, M. Prieto, & J. Barton (Eds.), Ecología Política en Chile: Poder, Naturaleza, Conocimiento (pp. 167–191). Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
Sloterdijk, P. (2011). Spheres I: Bubbles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stengers, I. (2005). The cosmopolitical proposal. In B. Latour & B. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sundberg, J. (2010). Diabolic Caminos in the desert and cat fights on the Río: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(2), 318–336.
Tironi, M.,, & Pirkovic, T. (2017). Conflictos energéticos en Chile: Estudio base para el period 2000–2015. Serie de Documentos de Trabajo de numies Abril 2017 Nº2. Aailable at https://figshare.com/articles/Catastro_de_Conflictos_Energ_ticos_en_Chile/4887017.
Tovey, H. (2003). Theorising nature and society in sociology: The invisibility of animals. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 196–215.
Waldron, J. (2012). Dignity, rank, & rights, with Wai Chee Dimock, Don Herzog, & Michael Rosen (M. Dan-Cohen, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1979[1929]). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press.
Wolfe, C. (2009). Human, all too human: ‘Animal studies’ and the humanities. PMLA, 124(2), 564–575.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 415 | 71 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 362 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 124 | 13 | 0 |
In this review, we report the main discussions and concepts debated in the workshop “Animals and Politics: Explorations for a More-Than-Human Democracy,” the first academic event on animal studies in Chile. After a brief overview of the workshop, we summarize its results by identifying three broad conversations that cut across the workshop—borders, affects, and effects.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 415 | 71 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 362 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 124 | 13 | 0 |