Riders’ Perceptions of Equestrian Communication in Sports Dressage
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Mari Zetterqvist Blokhuis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Charlotte Lundgren in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The aim of this study is to enhance the understanding of how sport dressage riders describe rider-horse communication when riding, and to relate these descriptions to current research on human-horse communication. Interviews with 15 amateur dressage riders were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The study shows that the interviewed riders describe the communication with the horses partly in a behavioristic way, applying concepts based on learning theory, which deviate from the description of riders as lacking understanding of these concepts put forth by some researchers. The riders connect the timing of their aids to equestrian feel, which they describe as the most difficult yet the most awarding aspect of the interspecies communication that riding is. Simultaneously, they acknowledge that horses are fully capable of choosing to listen to and cooperate with their requests.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Andersson, P., Bornemark, J., Ekström von Essen, Habib Engqvist, J., Svanberg I., & Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M. (2010). Kentauren—om interaktion mellan häst och människa (The Centaur—on interaction between horse and human). Huddinge: Södertörn Studies in Practical Knowledge 4.
-
Argent, G. (2016). Toward a privileging of the nonverbal. Communication, corporeal synchrony, and transcendence in humans and horses. In J. A. Smith & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), Experiencing Animal Minds. An Anthology of Animal-Human Encounters. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Birke, L. (2007). Learning to speak horse: The culture of natural horsemanship. Society & Animals, 15(3), 217–239.
-
Birke, L. (2008). Talking about horses: Control and freedom in the world of ‘Natural Horsemanship’. Society & Animals, 16(2), 107–126.
-
Birke, L. (2009). Investigating human/animal relations. In T. Holmberg (Ed.), Investigating Human Animal Relations in science, culture and work (pp. 18–32). Uppsala, Sweden: Centrum för genusvetenskap, Uppsala University.
-
Birke, L. (2010). The horse’s tale: Narratives of caring for/about horses. Society & Animals, 18, 331–347.
-
Birke, L., & Hockenhull, J. (2015). Journeys together: Horses and humans in partnership. Society & Animals, 23(1), 81–100.
-
Brandt, K. (2004). A language of their own: An interactionist approach to human-horse communication. Society & Animals, 12(4), 299–316.
-
Brown, S.-E. (2007). Companion animals as self objects. Anthrozoös, 20(4), 329–343.
-
Codex. (2016). Ethical guidelines published electronically by the Swedish Research Council. Retrieved from http://codex.vr.se/en/index.shtml.
-
Dashper, K. (2014). Tools of the trade or part of the family? Horses in competitive equestrian sport. Society & Animals, 22(4), 352–371.
-
Dashper, K. (2016). Learning to communicate: The Triad of (Mis)Communication in horse riding. In D. L. Davis & A. Maurstad (Eds.), The meaning of horses: Biosocial encounters (pp. 87–101). New York: Routledge.
-
Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 111–134.
-
Egenwall, A., Eisersiö, M., & Roepstorff, L. (2012). Pilot study of behavior responses in young riding horses using two methods of making transitions from trot to walk. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 7, 157–168.
-
Evans, R. & Franklin, A. (2010). Equine beats: Unique rhythms (and flouting harmony) of horses and riders. In T. Edenser (Ed.), Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, motilities, and bodies (pp. 173–188). Farnham: Ashgate.
-
fei, Fédération Equestre Internationale. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.fei.org/sites/default/files/DRE-Rules_2015_GA%20approved_black.pdf.
-
Game, A. (2001). Riding: Embodying the centaur. Body and Society, 7(4), 1–12.
-
German National Equestrian Federation. (1997). Principals of riding. Buckingham, UK: The Kenilworth Press Ltd.
-
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto. Dogs, people and otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
-
Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Sevrine, H., & Visser, E. K. (2008). A review of the human-horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109, 1–24.
-
ises, the International Society for Equitation Science. (2016). What is equitation science? Retrieved from http://www.equitationscience.com/.
-
Keaveney, S. M. (2008). Equines and their human companions. Journal of Business Research, 61, 444–454.
-
Keeling, L. J., Blomberg, A., & Ladewig, J. (1999). Horse-riding accidents: when the human–animal relationship goes wrong! Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, August 17–21, Lillehammer, Norway.
-
Lawrence, E. A. (1988). Horses in Society. Anthrozoös, 1(4), 223–231.
-
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
-
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
-
Lundesjö Kvart, S. (2013). Ridlärares pedagogiska praktik (The pedagogical practice of riding instructors). Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik, didaktik och utbildningsstudier, Pedagogisk forskning i Uppsala 164, augusti 2013.
-
Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878.
-
Maurstad, A., Davis, D., & Cowles, S. (2013). Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationship: a multi-species ethnography of be (com)ing human and be (com)ing a horse. Social Anthropologie, 21(3), 322–335.
-
McGreevy, P., & McLean, A. (2010). Equitation science. Malaysia: Wiley Blackwell.
-
McGreevy, P., & McLean, A. (2011). Punishment in horse-training and the concept of ethical equitation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(5), 193–197.
-
Meyners, E. (2004). Effective teaching and riding. Hudson, MT: Goals unlimited press.
-
oed, Oxford English dictionary. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/63727#eid5370092.
-
Podhajsky, A. (1965). The complete training of horse and rider. London, UK: The Sportsman’s Press.
-
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Savvides, N. (2011). “Loving-knowing” women and horses: Symbolic connections, real life conflicts and “natural horsemanship”. Humanimalia: A Journal of Human/Animal Interface Studies, 3(1), 60–76.
-
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
-
Smith, S. J. (2014). Human-horse partnerships: The discipline of dressage. In J. Gilett & M. Gilbert (Eds.), Sport, animals and society (pp. 35–51). New York: Routledge.
-
Smith, S. J. (2015). Riding in the skin of the movement: An agogic practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 9(1), 41–54.
-
Thompson, K., & Birke, L. (2014). The horse has got to want to help: Human-animal habituates and networks in amateur show jumping. In J. Gilett & M. Gilbert (Eds.), Sport, animals and society (pp. 69–84). New York: Routledge.
-
Thompson, K., & Nesci, C. (2016). Over-riding concerns: Developing safe relations in the high-risk interspecies sport of eventing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(1), 97–113.
-
Thorell, G., & Hedenborg, S. (2015). Riding instructors, gender, militarism, and stable culture in Sweden: Continuity and change in the twentieth century. The International Journal of the History of Sport, doi: 10.1080/09523367.2015.1021337.
-
Visser, E. K., Van Reenen, C. G., Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M., Morgan, K., Hassmén, P., Rundgren, M., & Blokhuis, H. J. (2008). Does horse temperament influence horse—Rider cooperation? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 11, 267–284.
-
Visser, E. K., Van Reenen, C. G., Zetterqvist, M., Morgan, K., & Blokhuis, H. J. (2003). Responses of horses in behavioural tests correlated with temperament assessed by riders. Equine Veterinary Journal, 35(2), 176–183.
-
Wipper, A. (2000). The partnership: The horse-rider relationship in eventing. Symbolic Interaction, 23(1), 47–70.
-
Wolframm, I. (2014). The science of equestrian sports. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
-
Zetterqvist, M. (2000). Didactics in horse jumping. Conference Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting, European Association of Animal Production (p. 360). The Hague, The Netherlands, August 21–24.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2860 | 528 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 1183 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 621 | 41 | 0 |
Riders’ Perceptions of Equestrian Communication in Sports Dressage
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Mari Zetterqvist Blokhuis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Lundgren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The aim of this study is to enhance the understanding of how sport dressage riders describe rider-horse communication when riding, and to relate these descriptions to current research on human-horse communication. Interviews with 15 amateur dressage riders were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The study shows that the interviewed riders describe the communication with the horses partly in a behavioristic way, applying concepts based on learning theory, which deviate from the description of riders as lacking understanding of these concepts put forth by some researchers. The riders connect the timing of their aids to equestrian feel, which they describe as the most difficult yet the most awarding aspect of the interspecies communication that riding is. Simultaneously, they acknowledge that horses are fully capable of choosing to listen to and cooperate with their requests.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2860 | 528 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 1183 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 621 | 41 | 0 |