Urban Animals—Domestic, Stray, and Wild: Notes from a Bear Repopulation Project in the Alps

In: Society & Animals
Andrea Mubi Brighenti University of Trento Italy

Search for other papers by Andrea Mubi Brighenti in
Current site
Google Scholar
Andrea Pavoni DINAMIA’CET, University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE) Portugal

Search for other papers by Andrea Pavoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



This piece explores “domesticity” as a social territory defined by its relationship with the conceptual and ecological space of “the wild,” and asks whether these spaces stand in opposition to each other or more subtle relations of co-implication are at play. As we look into the domestic and the wild, a conceptual map of notions emerges, including the public, the common, the civilized, and the barbarian. The paper suggests the domestic and the wild constitute two semiotic-ecological domains constantly stretching into each other without any stable or even clear boundary line, and it elaborates on a series of corollaries for studying non-human animals in urban contexts. As an illustrative case study, we follow the story of Daniza, a wild brown bear introduced in the Brenta Natural Park on the Italian Alps in the 2000s. Declared a “dangerous animal,” Daniza was accidentally, and controversially, killed by the public authorities in 2014.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1329 434 59
Full Text Views 196 18 1
PDF Views & Downloads 225 29 0