To Protect and Kill: US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Management of Human–Wildlife Conflict, 1996-2011

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Harms against nonhuman animals have become a significant concern in different disciplines (e.g., green criminology). This paper presents a multi-disciplinary discussion of one form of animal harm—wildlife harm—created by state agencies charged with protecting animals. Specifically, this issue is examined by reviewing the complex problems faced by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which is charged with competing objectives: between protecting economic and public health interests, and protecting wildlife. In managing the human–wildlife conflicts brought to its attention, the USFWS must often make tradeoffs between protecting economic and public health interests, and protecting wildlife. As the data reviewed here indicate, this leads the USFWS to kill a large number of animals each year to protect economic and public health interests—more than 40 million animals since 1996. The political and economic factors that influence these killings, and how the state balances conflicting interests, are also examined.

To Protect and Kill: US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Management of Human–Wildlife Conflict, 1996-2011

in Society & Animals



  • Animal Law Coalition. (2010). Wolves back on endangered species list.

  • Associated Press. (2009). FAA: Bird strikes more than double at major U.S. airports.

  • BalmfordA.FisherB.GreenR. E.NaidooR.StrassburgB.TurnerR. K. & RodriguesA. S. L. (2011). Bringing ecosystem services into the real world: an operational framework for assessing the economic consequences of losing wild nature. Environmental and Resource Economics48(2) 161-175.

  • BeirneP. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology37(1) 117-148.

  • BravoK. (2014). Wildlife control has shot and killed almost 26,000 birds at JFK Airport.

  • BurkettP. (2006). Marxism and ecological economics: Toward a red and green political economy. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

  • CardinaleB. J.DuffyJ. E.GonzalezA.HooperD. U.PerringsC.VenailP.NaeemS. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature486(7401) 59-67.

  • CartJ. (2014January 4). Congressmen question costs, mission of Wildlife Service agency. The Los Angeles Times.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014a). Mad cow disease.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014b). Reported tularemia cases, 2003-2012.

  • ChanK.PringleR. M.RanganathanJ. A. I.BoggsC. L.ChanY. L.EhrlichP. R.MacmynowskiD. P. (2007). When agendas collide: Human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology21(1) 59-68.

  • CohnJ. P. (2011). Wildlife groups opposing congressional delisting of gray wolf. BioScience61(8) 648.

  • DeLiberto T. J. & Beach R. H. (2006). USDA APHIS Wildlife Service’s National Wildlife Disease Surveillance and Emergency Response System (SERS). In R. M. Timm & J. M. O’Brien (Eds.) Proceeding of the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference (329-333). Davis CA: University of California Press.

  • DeVaultT. L.BlackwellB. F. & BelantJ. L. (Eds.). (2013). Wildlife in airport environments: Preventing animal-aircraft collisions through science-based management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • DolbeerR. A.BelantJ. L. & SillingsJ. (1993). Does shooting gulls reduce strikes with aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport. Wildlife Society Bulletin21442-450.

  • Dolbeer R. A. Chipman R. B. Gosser A. L. & Barras S. C. (2003). Does shooting alter flight patterns of gulls: A case study at John F. Kennedy International Airport. Proceedings of the International Bird Strike Committee 26 49-67.

  • FearsD. (2013December 15). Petition targets ‘rogue’ killings by Wildlife Service. The Washington Post.

  • Federal Registry. (2013). Proposed rules: Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services78(114) 35664-35719.

  • FosterJ. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: New York University Press.

  • HooperD. U.AdairE. C.CardinaleB. J.ByrnesJ. E. K.HungateB. A.MatulichK. L.GonzalezA.O’ConnorM. I. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature486(7401) 105-108.

  • LemieuxA. M. & ClarkeR. V. (2009). The international ban on ivory sales and its effects on elephant poaching in Africa. British Journal of Criminology49(4) 451-471.

  • LongM. A.StreteskyP. B.LynchM. J. & FenwickE. (2012). Crime in the coal industry: Implications for green criminology and treadmill of production theory. Organization & Environment25(3) 299-316.

  • LynchM. J.LongM. A.BarrettK. L. & StreteskyP. B. (2013). Is it a crime to produce ecological disorganization? Why green criminology and political economy matter in the analysis of global ecological harms. British Journal of Criminology55(3) 997-1016.

  • Martín-LópezB.MontesC.RamírezL. & BenayasJ. (2009). What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biological Conservation142(7) 1370-1380.

  • McCarthyD. P.DonaldP. F.ScharlemannJ. P. W.BuchananG. M.BalmfordA.GreenJ. M. H.ButchartS. H. M. (2012). Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science338(6109) 946-949.

  • MeliousJ. O. (2001). Enforcing the Endangered Species Act against the States. William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review25(3).

  • National Public Radio. (2014April 6). As man faces off with nature more often, U.S. Agency Scrutinized.

  • National Resources Defense Council. (2014). Reform Wildlife Service predatory control: Why does the government continue to kill public wildlife for private interests?

  • PiresS. F. & MoretoW. D. (2011). Preventing wildlife crimes: Solutions that can overcome the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research17(2) 101-123.

  • The Port Authority of NY & NJ. (2013). 2011 air traffic report.

  • RobertsonD. P. & HullR. B. (2003). Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environmental Science & Policy6(5) 399-410.

  • Predator Defense. (2016). The USDA’s war on wildlife.

  • ŞekercioğluÇ. H.DailyG. C. & EhrlichP. R. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences101 (52) 18042-18047.

  • SollundR. (2013). Animal trafficking and trade: Abuse and species injustice. In R. WaltersD. Solomon & T. Wyatt (Eds.) Emerging Issues in Green Criminology: Exploring Power Justice and Harm (pp. 72-92). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • SongS. J. & M’GonigleR. M. (2001). Science, power, and system dynamics: the political economy of conservation biology. Conservation Biology15(4) 980-989.

  • StirlingS. (2014March 23). Port Authority animal killings in NJ have little effect on bird strikes, data reveals. The Star Ledger.

  • StreteskyP. B. & LynchM. J. (2011). Coal strip mining, mountain top removal and the distribution of environmental violations across the United States, 2002-2008. Landscape Research36(2) 209-230.

  • StreteskyP. B.LongM. A. & LynchM. J. (2013a). The treadmill of crime: Political economy and green criminology. London, UK: Routledge.

  • StreteskyP. B.LongM. A. & LynchM. J. (2013b). Does environmental enforcement slow the treadmill of production? The relationship between large monetary penalties, ecological disorganization and toxic releases within offending corporations. Journal of Crime and Justice36(2) 235-249.

  • StuartS. N.ChansonJ. S.CoxN. A.YoungB. E.RodriguesA. S. L.FischmanD. L. & WallerR. W. (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science306 (5702) 1783-1786.

  • ThompsonR. M.BroseU.DunneJ. A.HallJr.R. O.HladyzS.KitchingR. L.TyliankisJ. M. (2012). Food webs: Reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution27(12) 689-697.

  • ThorpeJ. (2003). Fatalities and destroyed civil aircraft due to bird strikes 1915-2002. International Bird Strike Committee.

  • TrevesA. & KaranthK. U. (2003). Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology17(6) 1491-1499.

  • TrevesA.WallaceR. B.Naughton-TrevesL. & MoralesA. (2006). Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: A review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife11(6) 383-396.

  • US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS). (2014a). Wildlife damage.

  • US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS). (2014b). Threatened and endangered species protection.

  • US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS). (2014c). Wildlife damage management (For years 1996-2011).

  • US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2012). Ecology of emerging viral and bacterial diseases in wildlife.

  • US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2014a). Gray wolf, current population in the United States.

  • US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2014b). Gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains: News, information and recovery status report.

  • WardleD. A.BardgettR. D.CallawayR. M. & Van der PuttenW. H. (2011). Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science332(6035) 1273-1277.

  • WellsmithM. (2011). Wildlife crime: The problems of enforcement. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research17(2) 125-148.

  • WitmerG. W.SandersR. B. & TaftA. C. (2003). Feral swine: Are they a disease threat to livestock in the United States? USDA National Wildlife Research Center—Staff Publications292.

  • WitmerG.FineA. E.GionfriddoJ.PipasM.ShivelyK.PiccoloK. & BurkeP. (2010). Epizootiological survey of Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife and farm environments in Northern Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Disease46368-378.

  • WyattT. (2009). Exploring the organization of Russia Far East’s illegal wildlife trade: Two case studies of the illegal fur and illegal falcon trades. Global Crime10(1-2) 144-154.

  • WyattT. (2011). The illegal trade of raptors in the Russian Federation. Contemporary Justice Review14(2) 103-123.

  • WyattT. (2013). The local context of transnational wildlife trafficking: The Heathrow Animal Reception Centre. In R. WaltersD. Solomon & T. Wyatt (Eds.) Emerging Issues in green criminology: Exploring power justice and harm (pp. 108-216). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.


Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 67 67 67
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0