Tainted Love: The Trials and Tribulations of a Career in Animal Studies
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Siobhan O’Sullivan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Yvette Watt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Fiona Probyn-Rapsey in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Developing an academic career can be exciting, rewarding and stimulating. It can also be challenging, disheartening, and highly insecure. Results from a survey of Animal Studies (AS) scholars identifies reasons why pursuing a career in AS might generate additional challenges, over and above those experienced by academics generally. For example, 44 percent of respondents stated that in their view, undertaking research in AS “creates challenges for an academic career.” This is compared to just 16 percent who thought that it is an advantage. Yet despite the challenges, there is much that is positive about AS. Participants described being in “dialogue with clever colleagues,” viewed their work as “totally engaging,” and reported feeling “morally useful.” This in turn affords AS scholars an authenticity that may be of long-term benefit in the competitive and constantly transforming world of higher education.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aaltola, E. (2011). The philosophy behind the movement: Animal studies versus animal rights. Society & Animals, 19, 393-406.
-
Animals and Society Institute. (n.d.). Human-animal studies courses. Retrieved from http://www.animalsandsociety.org/human-animal-studies/courses/.
-
ARC. (2017). ARC major grants announced. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/news-media/news/arcs-major-grants-announced.
-
Archer, L. (2008). Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 385-403.
-
Berg, L. D., Huijbens, E. H., & Larsen, H. G. (2016). Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 60(2), 168-180.
-
Black, P. (2005). Class matters in UK HE. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(2-3), 127-138.
-
Boden, R., & Epstein, D. (2011). A flat earth society? Imagining academic freedom. The Sociological Review, 59(3), 476-495.
-
Bunds, K. S., & Giardina, M. D. (2017). Navigating the corporate university: Reflections on the politics of research in neoliberal times. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 227-235.
-
Butterwick, S., & Dawson, J. (2005). Undone business: Examining the production of academic labour. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(1), 51-65.
-
Cleave, J. V. (2017). I am Nel: Becoming (in)coherent scholars in neoliberal times. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 251-261.
-
Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329-345.
-
CNG Law. (2017). Animals and the law. Retrieved from https://www.cnglaw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Animals-and-the-Law.pdf.
-
Courtois, A., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish HE sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13(1), 43-66.
-
Cudworth, E. (2014). Beyond specieism: Intersectionality, critical sociology and the human domination of other animals. In N. Taylor & R. Twine (Eds.), The rise of critical animal studies: From the margins to the centre (pp. 19-35). New York, NY: Routledge.
-
Fisher, M. (2011). The privatisation of stress. Soundings, 48, 123-133.
-
Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228-244). London: Routledge.
-
Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2016). Resilience, apps and reluctant individualism: Technologies of self in the neoliberal academy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 91-99.
-
Grove, J. (2016). Fixed-term now the norm for early career academic, says UCU. The Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/fixed-term-now-the-norm-for-early-career-academics-says-university-and-college-union-ucu.
-
Hawkins, R., Manzi, M., & Ojeda, D. (2014). Lives in the making: Power, academia and the everyday. ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographers, 13(2), 328-351.
-
Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599-629.
-
Lorenz, C. (2015, January). The metrification of “quality” and the fall of the academic profession. Oxford Magazine, 5-11.
-
May, R., Peetz, D., & Strachan, G. (2013). The casual academic workforce and labour market segmentation in Australia. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 23(3), 258-275.
-
Rea, J. (2015). Organizing against the widening gap in academic job security in Australia. Academic Matters. Retrieved from https://academicmatters.ca/2015/06/organizing-against-the-widening-gap-in-academic-job-security-in-australia/.
-
Rea, J. (2016). Casualisation on the increase in academia. Connect: The Magazine for Australian Casual and Sessional Academic Staff, 9(1), 1.
-
Redden, G. (2008). Publish and flourish, or perish: RAE, ERA, RQF, and other acronyms for infinite human resourcefulness. M/C Journal, 11(4). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/44.
-
Shapiro, K., & DeMello, M. (2010). The state of human-animal studies. Society & Animals, 18(3), 307-318.
-
Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278-299.
-
Spooner, M. (2015). The deleterious personal and societal effects of the “audit culture” and a domesticated academy. International Review of Qualitative Research, 8(2), 212-228.
-
Wilkie, R. (2015). Academic “dirty work”: Mapping scholarly labor in a tainted mixed-species field. Society & Animals, 23(3), 211-230.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 709 | 92 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 119 | 5 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 116 | 12 | 0 |
Tainted Love: The Trials and Tribulations of a Career in Animal Studies
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Siobhan O’Sullivan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvette Watt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fiona Probyn-Rapsey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Developing an academic career can be exciting, rewarding and stimulating. It can also be challenging, disheartening, and highly insecure. Results from a survey of Animal Studies (AS) scholars identifies reasons why pursuing a career in AS might generate additional challenges, over and above those experienced by academics generally. For example, 44 percent of respondents stated that in their view, undertaking research in AS “creates challenges for an academic career.” This is compared to just 16 percent who thought that it is an advantage. Yet despite the challenges, there is much that is positive about AS. Participants described being in “dialogue with clever colleagues,” viewed their work as “totally engaging,” and reported feeling “morally useful.” This in turn affords AS scholars an authenticity that may be of long-term benefit in the competitive and constantly transforming world of higher education.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 709 | 92 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 119 | 5 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 116 | 12 | 0 |