Finding Sanctuary in the Occupational Choice of Animal Shelter Work
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Anne O’Connor in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper examines the occupational choice of animal shelter work. While the Human-Animal Studies (HAS) literature tends to implicitly assume shelter entry to be based on loving nonhuman animals, this study finds evidence that loving them is a necessary but insufficient antecedent. I understand and explain my respondents’ choice as processual; early experiences and influence of significant others, serendipitous events or changes in the life course, and alienation from previous workplaces combine to precede shelter entry. In terms of the decision to stay, shelter work appears to offer sanctuary to human actors as well as to the animals in their care. My respondents have found an alternative experience of the economy, one which is not isolated from, but embedded in, their values and moral rationalities. Shelter work offers sanctuary from the market economy in nature, as embodied by other animals.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alger, J.M., & Alger, S.F. (2003) Cat culture: The social world of a cat shelter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Arluke, A. (2006) Just a dog: Understanding animal cruelty and ourselves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. (1996) Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
ASPCA. (2018) Pet statistics, shelter intake and surrender. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.aspca.org./animal-homelessness/shelter-intake-and-surrender/pet-statistics.
-
Bauman, Z. (2014) What use is sociology? Conversations with Michael-Hviid Jacobsen and Keith Tester. Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985) Habits of the heart. New York: Harper & Row.
-
Blau, P.M., Gustad, J.W., Jessor, R., Parnes, H.S., & Wilcock, R.C. (1956) Occupational choice: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 9 (4), 531-543.
-
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
Branchi, H. (2010) Justice as sanctuary. New York: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
-
Bunderson, J.S., & Thomson, J.A. (2009) The call of the wild: zookeepers, callings and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (1), 32-57.
-
DeMello, M. (2012) Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Department of the Environment, Ireland. (2015) Official pound statistics. Dublin: Department of the Environment. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from www.housing.gov.ie.
-
Department of Rural & Community Development, Ireland. (2017) Official pound statistics. Dublin: Department of the Environment. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from www.drcd.gov.ie.
-
Dogs Trust. (2014) Dogs trust summary report. London: Dogs Trust. Retrieved May 2, 2015, from www.dogstrust.org.uk.
-
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography principles in practice. London: Routledge.
-
Harari, Y.N. (2018) 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape.
-
Harbolt, T.L. (2003) Bridging the bond: The cultural construction of the shelter pet. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
-
Hochschild, A. (1983) The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. London: University of California.
-
Hughes, E. (1958) Men and their work. Glencoe: Free Press.
-
Hutchinson, E.D. (2011) Dimensions of human behaviour: The changing life course. Sage Publications.
-
Irigaray, L. (2012) Animal compassion. In P. Atterton & M. Calarco (Eds.), Animal philosophy, ethics and identity (pp. 195-201). London: Continuum.
-
Irvine, L. (2004) If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
-
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. CA: Sage Publications.
-
Pachirat, T. (2011) Every twelve seconds: Industrialised slaughter and the politics of sight. Yale: Yale University Press.
-
Poole, M. (1997) Caring: A gendered concept. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 529-536.
-
Sanders, C.R. (2010) Working out back: The veterinary technician and “dirty work”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39 (3), 243-272.
-
Schabram, K., & Maitlis, S. (2017) Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal, 60 (2), 584-609.
-
Taylor, N. (2007) ‘Never an it’: Intersubjectivity and the creation of animal personhood in animal shelters’. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3 (1), 59-73.
-
Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16 (4), 409-421.
-
Wilkie, R. (2010) Livestock/deadstock: Working with farm animals from birth to slaughter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Wrzesniewski, A. (2002) It’s not just a job: Shifting meanings at work in the wake of 9/11. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 230-234.
-
Wuthnow, R. (2006) The changing nature of work in the united states: Implications for vocation, ethics and faith. In M.R. Schwehn & D.C. Bass (Eds.), Leading lives that matter: What we should do and who we should be (pp. 245-255). Michigan: Eerdmans.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 865 | 81 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 30 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 14 | 0 |
Finding Sanctuary in the Occupational Choice of Animal Shelter Work
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Anne O’Connor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This paper examines the occupational choice of animal shelter work. While the Human-Animal Studies (HAS) literature tends to implicitly assume shelter entry to be based on loving nonhuman animals, this study finds evidence that loving them is a necessary but insufficient antecedent. I understand and explain my respondents’ choice as processual; early experiences and influence of significant others, serendipitous events or changes in the life course, and alienation from previous workplaces combine to precede shelter entry. In terms of the decision to stay, shelter work appears to offer sanctuary to human actors as well as to the animals in their care. My respondents have found an alternative experience of the economy, one which is not isolated from, but embedded in, their values and moral rationalities. Shelter work offers sanctuary from the market economy in nature, as embodied by other animals.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 865 | 81 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 30 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 14 | 0 |