Dog Fighting: Performing Masculinity in Rural South Punjab, Pakistan
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Muhammad A. Kavesh in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Dog fighting, along with other nonhuman-animal-fighting activities, is a popular pastime in rural South Punjab, Pakistan. This article explicates dog fighting and discusses its symbolic significance to those who control the game, organize it, and participate in the performance. In discussing the activity, the paper raises multiple questions: how do rural men develop an attachment to their fighting dogs? What motivates the men to engage in dog fighting? How is dog fighting a cultural practice? What type of social gains do dog fighters make when there is no gambling involved? Finally, what symbolic meanings can be drawn from this activity from an emic perspective? The article is based on year-long ethnographic fieldwork with dog fighters in South Punjab, Pakistan, and examines the activity within the Punjabi cultural context where it is taken as an enthusiastic predilection (shauq) for displaying masculinity (mardāngī) to achieve honor (izzat).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alter, J. S. (1992). The wrestler’s body: Identity and ideology in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Animal Health Alliance. (2013). Pet ownership in Australia. Retrieved from http://animalmedicinesaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pet-Ownership-in-Australia-2013-Summary-ONLINE-VER.pdf.
-
Appadurai, A. (1995). Playing with modernity: The decolonization of Indian cricket. In C. A. Breckenridge (Ed.), Consuming modernity: Public culture in a South Asian world (pp. 23-48). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Bio-resource Research Centre. (2010). Bearbaiting. In BRC. Retrieved from http://www.pbrc.edu.pk/bearbaiting.htm.
-
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
-
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic capital and social classes. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 292-302.
-
Cassidy, R. (2002). The sport of kings: Kinship, class, and thoroughbred breeding in Newmarket. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Coleman, P. G. (2009). Note to athletes, NFL, and NBA: Dog fighting is a crime, not a sport. Journal of Animal Law & Ethics, 3(1), 85-119.
-
Evans, R. D., & Forsyth, C. J. (1997). Entertainment to outrage: A social historical view of dogfighting. International Review of Modern Sociology, 27(2), 59-71.
-
Evans, R., Gauthier, D. K., & Forsyth, C. J. (1998). Dogfighting: Symbolic expression and validation of masculinity. Sex Roles, 39(11-12), 825-838.
-
Frembgen, J. W. (2006). Honour, shame, and bodily mutilation: Cutting off the nose among tribal societies in Pakistan. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland, 16(03), 243-260.
-
Geertz, C. (1972). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. Daedalus, 101(1), 1-37. doi:10.2307/20024056.
-
Homan, M. (1999). A complete history of fighting dogs. Gloucestershire: Ringpress Books.
-
Hussain, S. (2010). Sports-hunting, fairness and colonial identity: Collaboration and subversion in the northwestern frontier region of the British Indian. Conservation and Society, 8(2), 112. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.68911.
-
Joseph, J. (1997). Bear-baiting in Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.wildlifeofpakistan.com/ResearchPapers/bear_baiting_report.pdf.
-
Kalof, L., & Taylor, C. (2007). The discourse of dog fighting. Humanity & Society, 31(4), 319-333.
-
Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous crossings: Race, species, and nature in a multicultural age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Laucella, P. C. (2010). Michael Vick: An analysis of press coverage on federal dogfighting charges. Journal of Sports Media, 5(2), 35-76.
-
Lefebvre, A. (1999). Kinship, honour and money in rural Pakistan: Subsistence economy and the effects of international migration. Richmond: Curzon.
-
Liechty, M. (2003). Suitably modern: Making middle-class in a new consumer society. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
-
Lyon, S. M. (2004). An anthropological analysis of local politics and patronage in a Pakistani village. Lewiston, Queenston, Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
-
Lyon, S. M., & Fischer, M. (2006). Anthropology and displacement: culture, communication and computers applied to a real world problem. Anthropology in Action, 13(3), 40-53.
-
Marvin, G. (1988). Bullfight. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.
-
McEwan, A., & Skandakumar, K. (2011). The welfare of greyhounds in Australian racing: Has the industry run its course? Australian Animal Protection Law Journal, 53, 53-74.
-
Nurbakhsh, J. (1989). Dogs: From a Sufi point of view. London & New York: Khaniqahi-Nimatullahi Publications.
-
Pandian, A. S. (2001). Predatory care: The imperial hunt in Mughal and British India. Journal of Historical Sociology, 14(1), 79-107.
-
Sandiford, K. A. P. (1983). Cricket and the Victorian society. Journal of Social History, 17(2), 303-317.
-
Shaw, A. (2000). Kinship and continuity: Pakistani families in Britain. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
-
Slobin, M. (1976). Music in the culture of Northern Afghanistan. Arizona: Tucson.
-
Smith, R. (2011). Investigating financial aspects of dog-fighting in the UK. Journal of Financial Crime, 18(4), 336-346.
-
Srinivasan, K. (2013). The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 106-119. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00501.x.
-
Veblen, T. (1912). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: The Macmillan Company.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1985 | 446 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 44 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 238 | 89 | 0 |
Dog Fighting: Performing Masculinity in Rural South Punjab, Pakistan
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Muhammad A. Kavesh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Dog fighting, along with other nonhuman-animal-fighting activities, is a popular pastime in rural South Punjab, Pakistan. This article explicates dog fighting and discusses its symbolic significance to those who control the game, organize it, and participate in the performance. In discussing the activity, the paper raises multiple questions: how do rural men develop an attachment to their fighting dogs? What motivates the men to engage in dog fighting? How is dog fighting a cultural practice? What type of social gains do dog fighters make when there is no gambling involved? Finally, what symbolic meanings can be drawn from this activity from an emic perspective? The article is based on year-long ethnographic fieldwork with dog fighters in South Punjab, Pakistan, and examines the activity within the Punjabi cultural context where it is taken as an enthusiastic predilection (shauq) for displaying masculinity (mardāngī) to achieve honor (izzat).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1985 | 446 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 44 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 238 | 89 | 0 |