Song of the Ovsîanka: Enhanced Nature of the Urban Canary in Imperial St. Petersburg (1880–1900)
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Olga Petri in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article explores a stylized version of “natural” birdsong as an element of the soundscape of a historical city, late-nineteenth-century St. Petersburg. From 1880 to 1900, canaries were brought to the city in great numbers from hatcheries located in the Russian countryside. Their song was the ovsîanka, a mix of melodies acquired from wild Russian birds. This song reflects “enhanced nature,” linking human intentionality to the agency of a nonhuman animal, the canary, and both to the city. Breeders, merchants, keepers, and birds formed a super-urban assemblage spanning the city and the countryside. Canaries, like human migrants flooding to the city during this time, retained their strong village roots, and their urban role depended on them. In this super-urban assemblage, the canaries’ urban performance was an expression of their modified and contextual agency, though their agency was assembled and authorized by human-nonhuman networks engendered by the city.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abozin, I. (1896). S.-Peterburg, kak odin iz glavneîshikh tsentrov torgovli ptitseî i produktami ptitsevodstva. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 1(January), 7-15.
-
Agamben, G. (2004). The open: Man and animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Aleksandrov, A. A. (1892). Doklad A. Aleksanrdova. S’ezd russkikh ptitsevodov. Zasedanie 25-ogo marta 1892 goda. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 10(October), 374-378.
-
Alferov, A. N. (1891). 7-oi konkurs ptitsevodstva, ustroennyî Ornitologicheskim ordelom Imperatorskogo Russkogo Obchshestva Akklimatizatsii Zhivornykh i Rasteniî. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 11(November), 585-588.
-
Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124-127.
-
Bater, J. (1976). St Petersburg: Industrialization and change. London, United Kingdom: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
-
Bater, J. (1986). Between old and new. St. Petersburg in the late imperial era. In M. F. Hamm (Ed.), The City in Late Imperial Russia. Kansas City, KS: Indiana University Press.
-
Birkhead, T. (2011). The wisdom of birds: An illustrated history of ornithology. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing UK.
-
Birkhead, T. (2014). The red canary. The story of the first genetically engineered animal. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
-
Bogdanov, K. S. (1889). Kanareîka, ee Razvedenit, Ukhod, i Lechenie Bolezneî. St. Petersburg: Tip. Doma Prizreniîa Maloletnikh Bednykh.
-
Bonhomme, B. (2007). For the ‘preservation of friends’ and the ‘destruction of enemies’: Studying and protecting birds in late Imperial Russia. Environment and History, 13(1), 71-100.
-
Breittruck, J. (2012). Pet birds. Cages and practices of domestication in eighteenth-century Paris. InterDisciplines, 3(1), 6-24.
-
Burton, C. (2014). Risking life and wing: Victorian and Edwardian conceptions of coal-mine canaries. Victorian Review, 40(2), 143-159.
-
Burton, C. (2017). Poeticizing the “pet of the parlor”: Domesticated canaries in Victorian periodicals. Nineteenth-Century Contexts. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(1), 15-31.
-
Calarco, M. (2015). Thinking through animals: Identity, difference, indistinction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Coates, P. (2015). Creatures enshrined: Wild animals as bearers of heritage. Past & Present, 226(suppl. 10), 272-298.
-
Connor, S. (2014). Rustications: Animals in the urban mix. In M. Gandy & B. Nilsen (Eds.), The acoustic city. Berlin, Germany: Jovis GmbH.
-
Costlow, J., & Nelson, A. (Eds.). (2010). Other animals: Beyond the human in Russian culture and history. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
-
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2014). What is philosophy? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
-
Dostoevsky, F. (1950). Notes from underground. In White nights and other stories (C. Garnett, Trans). New York, NY: Macmillan Co.
-
Dowling, J., Luther, D. A., & Marra, P. P. (2011). Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs. Behavioral Ecology, 23(1), 201-209.
-
Economakis, E. (1998). From peasant to Petersburger. London, United Kingdom: Macmillan Press.
-
Elagin, N. P. (1891). Russkoe Obchshetvo Ptitsevodstva. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 5-6(May and June), 274-286.
-
Elagin, N. P. (1892). Russkoe obchshestvo ptitsevodstva. Izvlechenii1a iz zhurnala ozerednykh sobraniî 13 i 29 aprelîa i 11 maîa Otchet po 4-î ocherednoî vystavke ptitsevodstva. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 7-8(July and August), 273-282.
-
Elagin, N. P. (1893). 5-îa ocherednaîa vystavka ptits i pronadlezhnosteî ptitsevodstva (okonchanie). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 6-7(June and July), 402-412.
-
Eremeev, I. (1897). Gorod St. Peterburg s tochki zreniîa meditsinskoî politsii. Sostavleno po rasporîazheniik1u g. St.-Peterburgskogo gradonachal’nika general-maîora N. V. Kleîgel’sa. St. Petersburg: Tip. M.D. Lombovskogo.
-
Fedorov, N. (1891). O razmnozhenii kanareek. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 5-6(May and June), 363-365.
-
Garrioch, D. (2003). Sounds of the city: The soundscape of early modern European towns. Urban History, 30(1), 5-25.
-
Gates, B. T. (1998). Kindred nature. Victorian and Edwardian women embrace the living world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Greer, K., & Guelke, J. (2003). Intrepid naturalists and polite observers: Recreational birdwatching and gender in southern Ontario, 1791-1886. Journal of Sport History, 30(3), 323-346.
-
Guida, M. (2018). Surviving twentieth century modernity: Birdsong and emotions in Britain. In H. Kean & P. Howell (Eds.), Routledge handbook of animal-human history (pp. 367-389). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
-
Haimson, L. (1964). The problem of social stability in urban Russia, 1905-1917 (Part One). Slavic Review, 23(4), 619-642.
-
Haimson, L. (1965). The problem of social stability in urban Russia, 1905-1917 (Part Two). Slavic Review, 24(1), 1-22.
-
Hansell, J. (2010). The pigeon in the wider world. PACCOM Inc.
-
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
-
Haraway, D. (2008). When species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Herrmann, B., & Woods, W. I. (2010). Neither biblical plague nor pristine myth: A lesson from central European sparrows. The Geographical Review, 100(2), 176-186.
-
Holden, G. H. (1888). Canaries and cage birds. New York, NY: George Henry Holden.
-
Îavlenskiî, V. (1891). Kanareîka i Ukhod za Neî. Moscow: T-vo Pechatnîa Îakovleva.
-
Jacob, S. (2015). Eco-Sonic media. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
-
Jerolmack, C. (2008). How pigeons became rats: The cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Social Problems, 55(1), 72-94.
-
Johnston, R. F., & Janiga, M. (1995). Feral pigeons. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
-
Krause, B. (2012). The great animal orchestra: Finding the origins of music in the world’s wild places. London, United Kingdom: Profile Books.
-
Kulagin, N. (1892). S’ezd russkikh ptitsevodov. Zasedanie 25-ogo marta 1892 goda. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 10(October), 374-378.
-
Legg, S. (2011). Assemblage/apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area, 43(2), 128-133.
-
Mann, M. (1887). Okhotnich’i Sekrety Strel’by na Dichi Na-Vernîak. Polnyî Kurs Okhoty na Ptits Bez Promakha Bit’ Ee v Let. S Prilozheniem Rukovodstv k Lovle Solov’ev, Zhavoronkov, i Ukhod i Razvedeniî Kanareek. Moscow: Tip. Malycheva.
-
Markova, M. A. (1889). Kanareîka v Nevole. Rukovodstvo k Soderzhaniîu, Prirucheniîu, Razvedeniîu i Lecheniîu. St. Petersburg: Tip. Muchnika.
-
Markova, M. A. (1891). Rol’ murav’ia v kanarovodstve. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 11(November), 570-573.
-
Markova, M. A. (1894a). Soderzhanie ptits v komnatakh. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 9(September), 318-325.
-
Markova, M. A. (1894b). Vanna-pavil’en dlîa kanaeek. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 9(September), 301-305.
-
Markova, M. A. (1895). Korm i pitanie kanareek. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 8-9(August-September), 342-353.
-
Mech’, A. (1892). Kak zhivet dikaîa kanareîka na svoeiî rodine. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 1(January), 38-40.
-
Mechsherskiî, A. A. (1907). Opisanie razvedenie kanareek v Astrakhani. Dnevnik Kruzhka Lîubiteleî Pevcheî i Drugoî Vol’noî Ptitsy, 1, 10-16.
-
Mitîurnikov, I. P. (1892). S’ezd russkikh ptitsevodov. Zasedanie 23-ogo marta 1892 goda. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 9(September), 347-358.
-
Mitîurnikov, I. P. (1894). Dobroe slovo k Russkim kanarovodam. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 5-6(May and April), 170-176.
-
Mitîurnikov, I. P. (1896). Eshche dva slova v zashchity kanareechnogo promysla v Rossii. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 2(February), 70-73.
-
Mullert, M. M. (1902). Soderzhanie i Razvedenie Kanareek. St. Petersburg: Tip. ‘Sever’.
-
Mynott, J. (2009). Birdscapes: Birds in our imagination and experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Nance, S. (2015). Animal modernity: Jumbo the elephant and the human dilemma. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Pivot.
-
Nevskiî, N. M. (1898). Rukovodstvo k Soderzhaniîu i Razdedeneîu Kanareek. Moscow: Tip Bulgakova.
-
Okhotnik. (1892). XIII-îa ocherednaîa vystavka moskovskogo obchshestva lîubiteleî ptitsevodstva. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 4(April), 184-190.
-
Paustovskiî, K. (1963). Bespokoînaia Îunost’. Moscow: AST Atrel’.
-
Philo, C. (1995). Animals, geography and the city: Notes on inclusion and exclusion. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 655-681.
-
Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (Eds.). (2007). Animal spaces, beastly places. New geography of human-animal relations. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
-
Raevskiî, F. V. (1899). Kanareîka. Razvedenie, Ukhod, Ubuchenie, Obuchenie Peniîu i Lechenie. St. Petersburg: Tip. Doma Prizreniîa Maloletnikh.
-
Randall, D. (2014). Cracks in the granite paternal care, the imperial façade, and the limits of authority in the 1824 St. Petersburg Flood. Journal of Urban History, 40(3), 479-496.
-
Rothenberg, D. (2005). Why birds sing. A journey into the mystery of bird song. New York, NY: Basic Books.
-
Rothfels, N. (2007). How the caged bird sings: Animals and entertainment. In K. Kete (Ed.), The cultural history of animals in the age of empire (pp. 95-112). Oxford, United Kingdom: Berg.
-
Russ, K. (1899). Kanareîka. Eîa Estestvennaîa Istoriîa, Razvedenie i Ukhod za Neîu (per. Kalinskiî, Îa. O.). St. Petersburg: Tip. Stasîulevicha.
-
Russkoe Obshchestva Ptitsevodstva. (1885). Ustav Russkogo Obshchestva Ptitsevodstva. St. Petersburg: Tip Panteleevykh.
-
Schlögel, K. (2009). Petersburg: Das Laboratorium der Moderne, 1909-1921. Munich: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag.
-
Seliverstov, Î. (Ed.). (1989). Leningrad. Istoriko-geografichesky atlas. Moscow: Glavnoje Upravlenje Geogeziji.
-
Sh, A. (1891). Med kak lekarstvo dlîa bol’nykh kanareek. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 12(January), 667-668.
-
Sh, A. (1892). Kak nado ukhazhivat’ za komnatnymi ptitsami. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 3(March), 129-130.
-
Smirnov, F. V. (1891). Izlechenie vshyvosti u kanareek. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 10(October), 515-516.
-
Smith, S., & Kelly, C. (2005). Commercial culture and consumerism. In C. Kelly & D. Shepherd (Eds.), Constructing Russia culture in the age of revolution 1881-1940. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
-
Steinberg, M. D. (2011). Petersburg Fin de Siècle. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
-
Steinberg, M. K. (2010). Avifaunal research and geographical perspectives. Geographical Review, 100(2), 0-III.
-
Svedeniîa o V-oî ocherednoî vystavke ptitsevodstva. (1893). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 5(May), 336-340.
-
Thomas, N. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(142), 21-37.
-
Urbanik, J. (2012). Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
-
Vakulovskiî, N. N. (1896). Mitîurnikov, I. P. (nekrolog). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 12(December), 450.
-
Vladimirskiî, A. (1893a). Sovremennoe polozhenie kanareechnogo promysla v Kaluzhskoî gubernii (putevye zametki). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 11(November), 612-615.
-
Vladimirskiî, A. (1893b). Sovremennoe polozhenie kanareechnogo promysla v Kaluzhskoî gubernii (putevye zametki) (okonchanie). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 12(December), 641-644.
-
Vladimirskiî, A. (1894). Iz zametok praktika. Ratsional’nyî korm dlîa kanareek. Ruchnaîa kanareîka. Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 2(February), 55-59.
-
Whitehouse, A. (2015). Listening to birds in the Anthropocene: The anxious semiotics of sound in a human-dominated world. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 53-71.
-
Wilcox, S., & Rutherford, S. (Eds.). (2018). Historical animal geographies. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
-
Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York, NY: Verso.
-
Zanosov, D., & Pyzin, V. (1991). Magaziny u lavki, restorany i traktiry. In V. P. Dmitrii Zanosov (Ed.), Iz Zhizni Peterburga 1890-1910-ykh godov. Zapiski Ochevidtsev (pp. 96-104). Leningrad: Lenizdat.
-
Zhurnal obchshego sobraniîa 7 aprelîa 1894 goda. (1894). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 5-6(May and June), 133-135.
-
Zhurnaly obshchego sobraniîa obshchetva 15 marta 1893 goda. (1893). Vestnik Ptitsedovstva, 4(April), 241-242.
-
Zoologicheskiî Magazin ‘Akvarium’. (1908). Lîubitel’ Prirody, 1-2(January-February), 91.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 306 | 91 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 46 | 17 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 61 | 14 | 3 |
Song of the Ovsîanka: Enhanced Nature of the Urban Canary in Imperial St. Petersburg (1880–1900)
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Olga Petri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article explores a stylized version of “natural” birdsong as an element of the soundscape of a historical city, late-nineteenth-century St. Petersburg. From 1880 to 1900, canaries were brought to the city in great numbers from hatcheries located in the Russian countryside. Their song was the ovsîanka, a mix of melodies acquired from wild Russian birds. This song reflects “enhanced nature,” linking human intentionality to the agency of a nonhuman animal, the canary, and both to the city. Breeders, merchants, keepers, and birds formed a super-urban assemblage spanning the city and the countryside. Canaries, like human migrants flooding to the city during this time, retained their strong village roots, and their urban role depended on them. In this super-urban assemblage, the canaries’ urban performance was an expression of their modified and contextual agency, though their agency was assembled and authorized by human-nonhuman networks engendered by the city.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 306 | 91 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 46 | 17 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 61 | 14 | 3 |