Attitudes toward Animals: Species Ratings
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Janis Wiley Driscoll in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
A questionnaire was used to assess people's attitudes toward 33 species of animals on six dimensions (useful-useless, smart-stupid, responsive-unresponsive, lovable-unlovable, safe-dangerous, and important-unimportant). A cluster analysis resulted in five groups of animals with similar ratings on these dimensions. Respondents were also asked about their attitudes toward hunting, fishing, and medical, scientific and product-testing research using animals.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2634 | 281 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 382 | 52 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 516 | 79 | 0 |
Attitudes toward Animals: Species Ratings
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Janis Wiley Driscoll in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
A questionnaire was used to assess people's attitudes toward 33 species of animals on six dimensions (useful-useless, smart-stupid, responsive-unresponsive, lovable-unlovable, safe-dangerous, and important-unimportant). A cluster analysis resulted in five groups of animals with similar ratings on these dimensions. Respondents were also asked about their attitudes toward hunting, fishing, and medical, scientific and product-testing research using animals.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2634 | 281 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 382 | 52 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 516 | 79 | 0 |