Save

Mental Health of Employees at a Canadian Animal Welfare Organization

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Jennifer Dunn Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph Ontario Canada

Search for other papers by Jennifer Dunn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Colleen Best Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph Ontario Canada

Search for other papers by Colleen Best in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David L. Pearl Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph Ontario Canada

Search for other papers by David L. Pearl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Andria Jones-Bitton Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph Ontario Canada

Search for other papers by Andria Jones-Bitton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Despite numerous benefits, a dark side exists in human and veterinary caregiving professions that can negatively impact caregiver mental health. It was postulated that other nonhuman animal caregivers, animal welfare employees, might experience mental health outcomes similar to those in analogous caregiving occupations. This study investigated employee mental health at a Canadian animal welfare organization using five validated mental health instruments: Perceived Stress Scale (stress), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety and depression), Professional Quality of Life Scale (compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue), Maslach Burnout Inventory Scale (burnout), and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (resilience). Front-line and support staff tended to have poorer mental health outcomes relative to the study population mean, potential for burnout was a notable concern, and resilience was below normal for most employees. These results shed light on the mental health of an animal caregiving occupation that has largely been ignored. Strategies for building employee resilience are discussed.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 323 182 16
Full Text Views 42 27 0
PDF Views & Downloads 94 64 0