Save

A View from Inside: Understanding Puerto Rico Cockfighting

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Úrsula A. Aragunde-Kohl School of Social Sciences and Communications, University Ana G. Méndez Gurabo Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Úrsula A. Aragunde-Kohl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yahaira Segarra-González Carlos Albizu University Mayagüez Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Yahaira Segarra-González in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Liza M. Meléndez-Samó Carlos Albizu University San Juan Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Liza M. Meléndez-Samó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ivemarie Hernández-Rivera School of Social Sciences and Communications, University Ana G. Méndez Gurabo Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Ivemarie Hernández-Rivera in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Carolina Quiles-Peña School of Social Sciences and Communications, University Ana G. Méndez Gurabo Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Carolina Quiles-Peña in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to better understand the beliefs and practices that the residents of Puerto Rico have regarding cockfighting, including their perception of the recently passed prohibition against nonhuman animal fighting on the island. It had an exploratory descriptive design consisting of three phases, where the qualitative data obtained from phase one would guide the process of identifying variables that could be measured. In the second phase, an instrument was developed, and in the third, it was administered. Most of the participants agreed with the prohibition of cockfighting in Puerto Rico and that it was necessary. The data showed that there is a disconnect between what the federal government of the United States legislated, what the local government and agencies that were supposed to enforce the prohibition did with the legislation, and what the people directly affected by the legislation received for education and guidance.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1676 401 36
Full Text Views 115 10 0
PDF Views & Downloads 236 21 0