Save

Outdoor Cats: Science, Ethics, and Politics

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
William S. Lynn Marsh Institute, Clark University Worster, MA USA
PAN Works Marborough, MA USA

Search for other papers by William S. Lynn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4957-426X
and
Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila Project Coyote and The Rewilding Institute Larkspur, CA USA
PAN Works Marborough, MA USA

Search for other papers by Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-9128
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The relationship between people, outdoor cats, and wildlife is the subject of fraught debate. Some conservationists claim cats are harbingers of chaos – akin to a zombie apocalypse threatening biodiversity and public health. The empirical evidence and scientific reasoning do not bear this out. Cats may or may not be a problem for biodiversity depending on diverse ecological and social contexts. Indeed, while all animals can be vectors or victims of zoonotic disease, cats are not a significant threat to public health. While most of the debate is focused on dueling claims about the science, that is not the primary source of the dispute. Instead, moral disputes drive the debate, and managing the relationship between people, cats, and wildlife is a wicked problem rooted in differing ethical values and worldviews. While wicked problems have no permanent or technical fix, addressing their ethical aspects is key to unlocking productive policy options.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 481 292 40
Full Text Views 82 61 2
PDF Views & Downloads 192 130 7