Primate Documentaries: A Critical Analysis of Their History
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Crystal M. Riley Koenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Bryan L. Koenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Primate nature documentaries have been popular with audiences since their inception in the early 1900s. Audiences trust primate documentaries, but scholars are concerned about how documentaries sometimes misrepresent primates. We provide an analysis of the history of primate documentaries, with a focus on how and why misrepresentation happens. We summarize why wildlife documentaries are important, and then we explain concerns over documentaries’ mischaracterization of nonhuman animals. Then, having viewed every available primate documentary (n = 210), we provide the first scholarly attempt to (a) provide a big-picture view by collating and describing the subgenres that can be used to characterize primate documentaries, and (b) describe the historical development of these subgenres, from early sensationalized films to modern large-budget productions. This history describes the chronological development of the diversity of primate documentary subgenres and explains the misrepresentation of primates as the result of filmmaker goals across that historical development.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adcroft, J. (2010). Reframing perceptions of anthropomorphism in wildlife film and documentary. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
-
Arendt, F., & Matthes, J. (2016). Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication, 10(4), 453–472.
-
Attenborough, D. (1961). Honesty and dishonesty in documentary film making. Photographic Journal, 101(4), 97–102, 130.
-
Aufderheide, P. (2007). Documentary film: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
-
Barbas, T. A., Paraskevopoulos, S., & Stamou, A. G. (2009). The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: A case study. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 61–69.
-
Bear, C. (2011). Being Angelica? Exploring individual animal geographies. Area, 43(3), 297–304.
-
Booth, R. (2017, January 1). Planet Earth II ‘a disaster for world’s wildlife’ says rival nature producer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/jan/01/planet-earth-ii-david-attenborough-martin-hughes-games-bbc-springwatch.
-
Boswall, J. (1962). Filming wild nature: Fair means or foul? Scientific Film, 3, 110–113.
-
Boswall, J. (1986). The ethics and aesthetics of slow motion in wildlife films. Image Technology, 68(11), 560–561.
-
Boswall, J. (1997). The moral pivots of wildlife film-making. EBU Diffusion, 9–11.
-
Bousé, D. (1998). Are wildlife films really “nature documentaries”? Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15(2), 116–140.
-
Bousé, D. (2000). Wildlife films. University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Breuer, T., Mavinga, F. B., Evans, R., & Lukas, K. E. (2017). Using video and theater to increase knowledge and change attitudes – Why are gorillas important to the world and to Congo? American Journal of Primatology, 79(10), e22692.
-
Burroughs, J. (1903). Real and sham natural history. Atlantic Monthly, 91, 298–309.
-
Chris, C. (2002). All documentary, all the time?: Discovery Communications Inc. and trends in cable television. Television & New Media, 3(1), 7–28.
-
Chris, C. (2006). Watching wildlife. University of Minnesota Press.
-
de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: Consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27(1), 255–280.
-
Durham, N. M. (1993). Review of audiovisual materials for use in teaching biological anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 36, 59–70.
-
Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Rylands, A. B., Roos, C., Fernandez-Duque, E., Di Fiore, A., Nekaris, K. A.-I., Nijman, V., Heymann, E. W., Lambert, J. E., Rovero, F., Barelli, C., Setchell, J. M., Gillespie, T. R., Mittermeier, R. A., Arregoitia, L. V., de Guinea, M., Gouveia, S., Dobrovolski, R., … Li, B. (2017). Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: Why primates matter. Science Advances, 3, 1–16.
-
Fortner, R. W. (1985). Relative effectiveness of classroom and documentary film presentations on marine mammals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 115–126.
-
Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human-primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101–117.
-
Fuentes, A., & Hockings, K. J. (2010). The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72(10), 841–847.
-
Gamel, S. (2012). Blue chip vs. presenter films. Currents, 2012(3), 1–2.
-
Goodall, J. (2015). Foreword. In C. Palmer, Confessions of a wildlife filmmaker: The challenges of staying honest in an industry where ratings are king (pp. ix–xii). Bluefield Publishing.
-
Holbert, R. L., Kwak, N., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviors: Integrating models of media consumption and effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 177–196.
-
Imperato, P. J., & Imperato, E. M. (1992). They married adventure: The wandering lives of Martin and Osa Johnson. Rutgers University Press.
-
INCEF. (2016). Saving great apes: Great apes public awareness project. http://www.incef.org/great-apes.html.
-
Ingram, D. (2013). The aesthetics and ethics of eco-film criticism. In S. Rust, S. Monani, and S. Cubitt (Eds.), Ecocinema theory and practice (pp. 43–62). Routledge.
-
Irwin interfered with nature, says Cousteau. (2006, September 20). The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/irwin-interfered-with-nature-says-cousteau/2006/09/20/1158431752163.html.
-
Kilborn, R. (2006). A walk on the wild side: The changing face of TV wildlife documentary. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 48.
-
King, M. J. (1996). The audience in the wilderness: The Disney nature films. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 24(2), 60–68.
-
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Climate change in the American mind: America’s global warming beliefs and attitudes. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705.
-
Martin, T. (2014, June 9). Are we doing the right thing? BBC offers a moral compass for wildlife filmmakers. Natural History Network. https://www.naturalhistorynetwork.co.uk/features/are-we-doing-right-thing-bbc-offers-moral-compass-wildlife-filmmakers.
-
Mills, B. (2013). The animals went in two by two: Heteronormativity in television wildlife documentaries. European Journal of Culture, 16(1), 100–114.
-
Mills, S. (1997, February 21). Pocket tigers: The sad unseen reality behind the wildlife film. Times Literary Supplement. http://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/5617728/data/pocket-tigers-article-data.pdf.
-
Mitman, G. (1999). Reel nature: America’s romance with wildlife on film. Harvard University Press.
-
Monbiot, G. (2002, December 17). Planet of the fakes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2002/dec/17/broadcasting.comment.
-
Morrow, K. S., Jameson, K. A., & Trinidad, J. S. (2017). Primates in film. In A. Fuentes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–12). Wiley & Sons.
-
Nekaris, K. A.-I., Campbell, N., Coggins, T. G., Rode, E. J., & Nijman, V. (2013). Tickled to death: Analysing public perceptions of ‘cute’ videos of Threatened species (Slow lorises – Nycticebus spp.) on Web 2.0 sites. PLoS One, 8(7), e69215.
-
Palmer, C. (2010). Shooting in the wild: An insider’s account of making movies in the animal kingdom. Sierra Club Books.
-
Palmer, C. (2011, May 17). Into the wild, ethically: Nature filmmakers need a code of conduct. Documentary Magazine. https://www.documentary.org/magazine/wild-ethically-nature-filmmakers-need-code-conduct.
-
Palmer, C. (2015). Confessions of a wildlife filmmaker: The challenges of staying honest in an industry where ratings are king. Bluefield Publishing.
-
Palombit, R. A. (1994). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Animal Behaviour, 47(3), 721–723.
-
Pollo, S., Graziano, M., & Giacoma, C. (2009). The ethics of natural history documentaries. Animal Behaviour, 77, 1357–1360.
-
Pollock, M. S. (2015). Storytelling apes: Primatology narratives past and future. The Pennsylvania State University.
-
Reichard, U. (1995). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology, 100, 99–112.
-
Richards, M. (2013). Greening wildlife documentary. In L. Lester and B. Hutchins (Eds.), Environmental conflict and the media (pp. 171–185). Peter Lang Publishing.
-
Richards, M. (2014). The wildlife docusoap: A new ethical practice for wildlife documentary? Television & New Media, 15(4), 321–335.
-
Riley Koenig, C. M., & Sanz, C. M. (2017). Primate Films Database. https://anthropology.artsci.wustl.edu/primate-films-database.
-
Riley Koenig, C. M., Koenig, B. L., & Sanz, C. M. (2018). Teaching anthropology with primate documentaries: Investigating instructors’ use of films and introducing the Primate Films Database. American Anthropologist, 120(1), 24–38.
-
Riley Koenig, C. M., Koenig, B. L., & Sanz, C. M. (2019). Overrepresentation of flagship species in primate documentaries and opportunities for promoting biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 238, 108188.
-
Riley Koenig, C. M., Koenig, B. L., & Sanz, C. M. (under review). Portrayals of wild primates in documentary films: Reason for concern?
-
Roosevelt, T. (1907). Nature fakers. Everybody’s Magazine, 17(3), 427–430.
-
Ross, S. R., Lonsdorf, E. V., Stoinski, T. S., Hare, B., Shumaker, R., & Goodall, J. (2008). Inappropriate use and portrayal of chimpanzees. Science, 319, 1487.
-
Ross, S. R., Vreeman, V. M., & Lonsdorf, E. V. (2011). Specific image characteristics influence attitudes about chimpanzee conservation and use as pets. PLoS One, 6(7), 1–5.
-
Schroepfer, K. K., Rosati, A. G., Chartrand, T., & Hare, B. (2011). Use of “entertainment” chimpanzees in commercials distorts public perception regarding their conservation status. PLoS One, 6(10), 1–8.
-
Staples, A. J. (2006). Safari adventure: Forgotten cinematic journeys in Africa. Film History: An International Journal, 18(4), 392–411.
-
Watts, D. P. (2006). The role of television documentaries in great ape conservation. International Journal of Primatology, 27, Abstract # 459.
-
Wexler, R. (2008). Onward, Christian penguins: Wildlife film and the image of scientific authority. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39, 273–279.
-
Wright, J. H. (2010). Use of film for community conservation education in primate habitat countries. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 462–466.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 732 | 209 | 48 |
| Full Text Views | 232 | 21 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 333 | 45 | 8 |
Primate Documentaries: A Critical Analysis of Their History
In: Society & AnimalsSearch for other papers by Crystal M. Riley Koenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bryan L. Koenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Primate nature documentaries have been popular with audiences since their inception in the early 1900s. Audiences trust primate documentaries, but scholars are concerned about how documentaries sometimes misrepresent primates. We provide an analysis of the history of primate documentaries, with a focus on how and why misrepresentation happens. We summarize why wildlife documentaries are important, and then we explain concerns over documentaries’ mischaracterization of nonhuman animals. Then, having viewed every available primate documentary (n = 210), we provide the first scholarly attempt to (a) provide a big-picture view by collating and describing the subgenres that can be used to characterize primate documentaries, and (b) describe the historical development of these subgenres, from early sensationalized films to modern large-budget productions. This history describes the chronological development of the diversity of primate documentary subgenres and explains the misrepresentation of primates as the result of filmmaker goals across that historical development.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 732 | 209 | 48 |
| Full Text Views | 232 | 21 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 333 | 45 | 8 |