Save

Managing the Stigma of Outlaw Breeds: A Case Study of Pit Bull Owners

In: Society & Animals
Authors:
Gary Patronek Tufts Center for Animals and Pubic Policy

Search for other papers by Gary Patronek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hillary Twining Tufts Center for Animals and Pubic Policy

Search for other papers by Hillary Twining in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Arnold Arluke Tufts Center for Animals and Pubic Policy

Search for other papers by Arnold Arluke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Ethnographic interviews were conducted with 28 pit bull "owners" to explore the sociological experience of having a dog with a negative image. Results indicate that the vast majority of respondents felt that these dogs were stigmatized because of their breed. Respondents made this conclusion because friends, family, and strangers were apprehensive in the presence of their dogs and because they made accusations about the breed's viciousness and lack of predictability. In the face of this stigma, respondents resorted to using a variety of interactional strategies to lessen the impact of this perception or prevent it from occurring. These strategies included passing their dogs as breeds other than pit bulls, denying that their behavior is biologically determined, debunking adverse media coverage, using humor, emphasizing counter-stereotypical behavior, avoiding stereotypical equipment or accessories, taking preventive measures, or becoming breed ambassadors.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6366 1181 84
Full Text Views 721 50 4
PDF Views & Downloads 973 102 9