Village Dogs in Coastal Mexico

The Street as a Place to Belong

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Village dogs are important for households in coastal Mexico, yet they are seen as out of place by etic stakeholders (public health and wildlife experts, and animal welfarists). Caregivers of village dogs are considered irresponsible, a view that is reinforced by Mexican policy. We describe two contrasting etic discourses in this article that have emerged from ideologies based on human-dog relation theories. The article is part of an ongoing shift in the social sciences that has seen attempts to move beyond anthropocentrism and to explore human-animal relations outside the parameters of the traditional nature-culture dichotomy. Local narratives hinge on different experiences with dogs. Villagers perceive their dogs as adults, capable of and subject to judgment. Etic discourses are currently the basis for dog management policies. Attaching the label of “irresponsible owner” to the caregivers of village dogs prevents their inclusion as legitimate participants in policy processes.

Village Dogs in Coastal Mexico

The Street as a Place to Belong

in Society & Animals

Sections

References

Acosta-JamettG.CleavelandS.CunninghamA. & BronsvoortB. (2010). Demography of domestic dogs in rural and urban areas of the Coquimbo Region of Chile and implications for disease transmission. Preventive Veterinary Medicine94(3) 272-281.

Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal ii Legislatura. (2002). Ley de Protección a los Animales del Distrito Federal.

AtkinsP. (2012). Animal Cities: Beastly Urban Histories. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing.

BattagliaD. & SaldarriagaA. (2011). Why Is Dog Population Management Important? (Documentary). Animal Production Division and Health, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (fao). Retrieved from www.fao.org/ag/againfo/resources/en/videos_AW.htm.

BhattacharyyaJ. & LarsonB. M. (2014). The need for indigenous voices in discourse about introduced species: Insights from a controversy over wild horses. Environmental Values23(6) 663-684.

BlouinD. D. (2013). Are dogs children, companions, or just animals? Understanding variations in people’s orientations toward animals. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals26(2) 279-294.

BoitaniL.CiucciP. & OrtolaniA. (2007). Behaviour and social ecology of free-ranging dogs. In P. Jensen (Ed.) The Behavioural Biology of Dogs (pp. 147-165). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

BrandD. (1960). Coalcomán and Motines del Oro: An Ex-distrito of Michoacán Mexico. University of Texas at Austin. Institute of Latin American Studies.

BrownK. & DilleyR. (2012). Ways of knowing for ‘response‐ability’in more‐than‐human encounters: The role of anticipatory knowledges in outdoor access with dogs. Area44(1) 37-45.

BuchananB. (2007). Companions to None: A Documentary Film (dvd). Buchanan Film Company.

BullerH. (2004). Where the wild things are: The evolving iconography of rural fauna. Journal of Rural Studies20(2) 131-141.

BullerH. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography38(2) 308-318.

Burgess-JacksonK. (1998). Doing right by our animal companions. The Journal of Ethics2159-185.

ButlerJ. R. A.Du ToitJ. T. & BinghamJ. (2004). Free-ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as predators and prey in rural Zimbabwe: Threats of competition and disease to large wild carnivores. Biological Conservation115(3) 369-378.

ButlerJ. R. & BinghamJ. (2000). Demography and dog-human relationships of the dog population in Zimbabwean communal lands. The Veterinary Record147(16) 442-446.

CamposC.EstevesC.FerrazK.CrawshawP. & VerdadeL. (2007). Diet of free-ranging cats and dogs in a suburban and rural environment, south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Zoology27314-20.

ConstableS.DixonR. & DixonR. (2010). For the love of dog: The human-dog bond in rural and remote Australian indigenous communities. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals23(4) 337-349.

Coppinger R. & CoppingerL. (2001). Village dogs. In R. Coppinger & L. Coppinger (Eds.) Dogs: A New Understanding of Canine Origin Behavior and Evolution (pp. 69-82). New York, NY: Scribner.

Di NardoA.CandeloroL.BudkeC. M. & SlaterM. (2007). Modeling the effect of sterilization rate on owned dog population size in central Italy. Preventive Veterinary Medicine82(3) 308-313.

DonaldsonS. & Kymlicka W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

EscobarA. (1998). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology5(1) 53-82.

FalconerJ. (2009.) Slum dogs by the millions. All Animals MagazineSeptember12-19.

FiorelloC. V.NossA. J. & DeemS. L. (2006). Demography, hunting ecology, and pathogen exposure of domestic dogs in the Isoso of Bolivia. Conservation Biology20(3) 762-771.

FoxM. W. (1980). Pets and their owners. In Returning to Eden. Animal Rights and Human Responsibility (pp. 69-85). New York, NY: The Viking Press.

GamborgC.GremmenB.ChristiansenS. B. & SandoeP. (2010). De-domestication: Ethics at the intersection of landscape restoration and animal welfare. Environmental Values19(1) 57-78.

HarawayD. (2008). Value-added dogs and lively capital. In C. Wolfe (Ed.) When Species Meet (pp. 45-68). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

HarawayD. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs People and Significant Otherness (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

HensK. (2008). Ethical responsibilities towards dogs: An inquiry into the dog–human relationship. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics22(1) 3-14.

HovorkaA. (2008). Cultural geographies transspecies urban theory: Chickens in an African city. Cultural Geographies1595-117.

HowellP. (2012). Between the muzzel and the leash: Dog-walking, discipline and the modern city. In P. Atkins (Ed.) Animal Cities: Beastly Urban Histories (pp. 227-228). Surrey, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing.

inegi. (2005). Conteo de Población y Vivienda. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.

JerolmackC. (2008). How pigeons became rats: The cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Social Problems55(1) 72-94.

KitalaP.McDermottJ.KyuleM.GathumaJ.PerryB. & WandelerA. (2001). Dog ecology and demography information to support the planning of rabies control in Machakos District, Kenya. Acta Tropica78(3) 217-230.

LongN. (2001). Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London, United Kingdom: Routeledge.

LordK.FeinsteinM.SmithB. & CoppingerR. (2012). Variation in reproductive traits of members of the genus Canis with special attention to the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes92131-142.

Malaga-AlbaA. (1962). Factores epidemiológicos que rigen el control de la rabia. Boletín de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana53(2) 105-114.

MatterH. & DanielsT. (2001). Dog ecology and population biology. In C. MacPhersonF. Meslin & A. Wandeler (Eds.) Dogs Zoonoses and Public Health (pp. 17-62). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.

McGeeR. (2004). Unpacking policy: Actors, knowledge and spaces. In M. Brock & J. Gaventa (Eds.) Unpacking Policy: Knowledge Actors and Spaces in Poverty Reduction in Uganda and Nigeria (pp. 1-19). Kampala, Uganda: Fountain Publishers.

Medellín LegorretaR. (2000). Canis lupus. Vertebrados Superiores Exóticos en México: Diversidad Distribución y Efectos Potenciales. Informe final snibconabio proyecto No. U020. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto de Ecología México d.f. Mexico.

MortersM. K.BharadwajS.WhayH. R.CleavelandS.DamriyasaI. M. & WoodJ. L. N. (2014). Participatory methods for the assessment of the ownership status of free-roaming dogs in Bali, Indonesia, for disease control and animal welfare. Preventive Veterinary Medicine116(1) 203-208.

MortersM. K.RestifO.HampsonK.CleavelandS.WoodJ. L. & ConlanA. J. (2013). Evidence‐based control of canine rabies: A critical review of population density reduction. Journal of Animal Ecology82(1) 6-14.

oie (Office International des Epizooties). (2011). Terrestrial Animal Health CodeChapter 7.7. Stray dog population control.

OrtolaniA.VernooijH. & CoppingerR. (2009). Ethiopian village dogs: Behavioural responses to a stranger’s approach. Applied Animal Behaviour Science119(3) 210-218.

Philo C. & WilbertC. (2000). Animal Spaces Beastly Places. London: Routledge.

PowerE. R. (2012). Domestication and the dog: Embodying home. Area44(3) 371-378.

Real Academia Española. (2017). Diccionario de la lengua española (edición del tricentenario). Retrieved from http://www.rae.es/rae.html.

Ruiz-IzaguirreE. & EilersC. H. A. M. (2012). Perceptions of village dogs by villagers and tourists in the coastal region of rural Oaxaca, Mexico. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals25(1) 75-91.

Ruiz‐IzaguirreE.WoersemA.EilersK.WierenS. E.BoschG.ZijppA. J. & BoerI. J. M. (2014). Roaming characteristics and feeding practices of village dogs scavenging sea‐turtle nests. Animal Conservation18(2) 146-156. doi:10.1111/acv.12143.

Soi Dog Foundation. (2017). Soi Dog. Retrieved from www.soidog.org.

SrinivasanK. (2012). The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the uk and India (pp. 1-14). In Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

ssa (Secretaría de Salud). (2001). Programa de Acción: Rabia. Technical report. Secretaría de Salud.

ssa (Secretaría de Salud). (2011). Norma Oficial Mexicana nom-011-SSA2-2011 para la Prevención y Control de la Rabia Humana en los Perros y Gatos. Secretaría de Salud.

SteevesP. H. (2005). Lost dog, or, Levinas faces the animal. In M. Pollock & C. Rainwater (Eds.) Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art Literature Philosophy and Popular Culture (pp. 22-35). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

StrandP. (2003). Humane or Insane? The Importation of Foreign Strays into us Shelters Threatens Health, Sustains ‘Overpopulation.’ Retrieved from www.naiaonline.org.

Valadez-AzúaR. & Mestre-ArriojaG. (1999). Años de oscuridad. In R. V. Azúa (Ed.) Historia del Xoloitzcuintle en México (pp. 99-111). UNAMInstituto de investigaciones Antropológicas Museo Dolores Olmedo Patiño Cámara de Diputados México d.f.

who. (1988). Report of who Consultation on Dog Ecology Studies Related to Rabies ControlGeneva. World Health Organization.

WolchJ. & EmelJ. (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. London: Verso.

YoungJ. K.OlsonK.ReadingR.AmgalanbaatarS. & BergerJ. (2011). Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. BioScience61(2) 125-132.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 94 94 31
Full Text Views 70 70 48
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0