Although various benefits of cats and dogs have been extensively studied, their fundamental economic value is poorly understood. Economic values are, in contrast to monetary values, determined subjectively and guide individuals in their decisions. This study presents a conceptual economic model of the value of cats and dogs which provides a basis for future research. Benefits of cats and dogs identified in the literature are categorized in relation to the model. The multidimensional value of these nonhuman animals includes different use and non-use values, for caretakers and other humans. Data from an online survey on the salience (importance of attributes in memory) of cats and dogs in Sweden provide support for the proposed model. It is argued that the subjective well-being approach developed in psychology provides a good starting point for estimating many of the economic values of these animals, but that different types of values may require different approaches.
avma (American Veterinary Medical Association). (2013). u.s. Pet ownership & demographics sourcebook. Retrieved June 15, 2014, from https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Statistics/Pages/Market-research-statistics-US-pet-ownership.aspx.
Blecker, D., Hiebert, N., & Kuhne, F. (2013). Preliminary study of the impact of different dog features on humans in public. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 8, 170-174.
Chen, C. M., Tischer, C., Schnappinger, M., & Heinrich, J. (2010). The role of cats and dogs in asthma and allergy—a systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 213, 1-31.
Chur-Hansen, A., Stern, C., & Winefield, H. (2010). Gaps in the evidence about companion animals and human health: Some suggestions for progress. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 8, 140-146.
Duvall Antonacopoulos, N. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2010). An examination of the potential role of pet ownership, human social support and pet attachment in the psychological health of individuals living alone. Anthrozoös, 23, 37-54.
Headey, B., Grabka, M., Jonathan, K., Prasuna, R., & Yi-Ping,T. (2002). Pet ownership is good for your health and saves public expenditure too: Australian and German longitudinal evidence. Australian Social Monitor, 5(4), 93-99.
Hoerster, K. D., Mayer, J. A., Sallis, J. F., Pizzi, N., Talley, S., Pichon, L. C., & Butler, D. A. (2011). Dog walking: Its association with physical activity guideline adherence and its correlates. Preventive Medicine, 52, 33-38.
McKendree, M. G. S., Croney, C. C., & Olynk Widmar, N. J. (2014). Bioethics symposium ii: Current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 1821-1831.
Müllersdorf, M., Granström, F., Sahlqvist, L., & Tillgren, P. (2010). Aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics associated with pet ownership in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38, 53-63.
Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., & Rodgers, B. (2005). Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60-64. Gerontology, 51, 40-47.
Toohey, A. M., & Rock, M. J. (2011). Unleashing their potential: a critical realist scoping review of the influence of dogs on physical activity for dog-owners and non-owners. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 46.
Virués-Ortega, J., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Castellote, J., Población, A. A., & De Pedro-Cuesta, J. (2012). Effect of animal-assisted therapy on the psychological and functional status of elderly populations and patients with psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 6, 197-221.