Economic Perspective on the Value of Cats and Dogs

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Although various benefits of cats and dogs have been extensively studied, their fundamental economic value is poorly understood. Economic values are, in contrast to monetary values, determined subjectively and guide individuals in their decisions. This study presents a conceptual economic model of the value of cats and dogs which provides a basis for future research. Benefits of cats and dogs identified in the literature are categorized in relation to the model. The multidimensional value of these nonhuman animals includes different use and non-use values, for caretakers and other humans. Data from an online survey on the salience (importance of attributes in memory) of cats and dogs in Sweden provide support for the proposed model. It is argued that the subjective well-being approach developed in psychology provides a good starting point for estimating many of the economic values of these animals, but that different types of values may require different approaches.

Society & Animals

Journal of Human-Animal Studies

Sections

References

appa (American Pet Products Association). appa national pet owners survey. Retrieved June 15, 2014, from http://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp.

Arnott, E. R., Early, J. B., Wade, C. M., & McGreevy, P. D. (2014). Estimating the economic value of Australian stock herding dogs. Animal Welfare, 23, 189-197.

avma (American Veterinary Medical Association). (2013). u.s. Pet ownership & demographics sourcebook. Retrieved June 15, 2014, from https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Statistics/Pages/Market-research-statistics-US-pet-ownership.aspx.

Barker, S. B. S., & Wolen, A. R. A. (2008). The benefits of human—companion animal interaction: A review. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 35, 487-495.

Blecker, D., Hiebert, N., & Kuhne, F. (2013). Preliminary study of the impact of different dog features on humans in public. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 8, 170-174.

Chen, C. M., Tischer, C., Schnappinger, M., & Heinrich, J. (2010). The role of cats and dogs in asthma and allergy—a systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 213, 1-31.

Chomel, B. B., & Sun, B. (2011). Zoonoses in the bedroom. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17, 167-172.

Chur-Hansen, A., Stern, C., & Winefield, H. (2010). Gaps in the evidence about companion animals and human health: Some suggestions for progress. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 8, 140-146.

Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 391-406.

Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25-46.

Duvall Antonacopoulos, N. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2010). An examination of the potential role of pet ownership, human social support and pet attachment in the psychological health of individuals living alone. Anthrozoös, 23, 37-54.

Dwyer, F., Bennett, P. C., & Coleman, G. J. (2006). Development of the Monash dog owner relationship scale (mdors). Anthrozoös, 19, 243-256.

fediaf—The European Pet Food Industry Federation. (2013). Facts & figures 2012. Brussels.

Headey, B., Grabka, M., Jonathan, K., Prasuna, R., & Yi-Ping,T. (2002). Pet ownership is good for your health and saves public expenditure too: Australian and German longitudinal evidence. Australian Social Monitor, 5(4), 93-99.

Headey, B., & Grabka, M. M. (2007). Pets and human health in Germany and Australia: National longitudinal results. Social Indicators Research, 80, 207-311.

Herzog, H. (2011). The impact of pets on human health and well-being: Fact, fiction, or hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 236-239.

Himsworth, C. G., & Rock, M. (2013). Pet ownership, other domestic relationships, and satisfaction with life among seniors: Results from a Canadian national survey. Anthrozoös, 26, 295-305.

Hoerster, K. D., Mayer, J. A., Sallis, J. F., Pizzi, N., Talley, S., Pichon, L. C., & Butler, D. A. (2011). Dog walking: Its association with physical activity guideline adherence and its correlates. Preventive Medicine, 52, 33-38.

Kahneman, D., Walker, P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Exploration of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 373-405.

Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117-125.

Koivusilta, L. K., & Ojanlatva, A. (2006). To have or not to have a pet for better health? PloS One 1(1): e109.

Lagerkvist, C. J., Hansson, H., Hess, S., & Hoffman, R. (2011). Provision of farm animal welfare: Integrating productivity and non-use values. Applied Economics Perspectives and Policy, 33, 484-509.

McKendree, M. G. S., Croney, C. C., & Olynk Widmar, N. J. (2014). Bioethics symposium ii: Current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 1821-1831.

McNicholas, J., Gilbey, A., Rennie, A., Ahmedzai, S., Dono, J., & Ormeriod, E. (2005). Pet ownership and human health: A brief review of evidence and issues. British Medical Journal, 331, 1252-1254.

Miltiades, H., & Shearer, J. (2011). Attachment to pet dogs and depression in rural older adults. Anthrozoös, 24, 147-154.

Morley, C., & Fook, J. (2005). The importance of pet loss and some implications for services, Mortality: Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying, 10, 127-143.

Müllersdorf, M., Granström, F., Sahlqvist, L., & Tillgren, P. (2010). Aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics associated with pet ownership in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38, 53-63.

Neumann, S. L. (2010). Animal welfare volunteers: Who are they and why do they do what they do. Anthrozoös, 23, 351-364.

Nimer, J., & Lundahl, B. (2007). Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös, 20: 225-238.

Parker, G., Gayed, A., Owen, C., Hyett, M., Hilton, T., & Heru, G. (2010). Survival following an acute coronary syndrome: A pet theory put to the test. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121, 65-70.

Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., & Rodgers, B. (2005). Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60-64. Gerontology, 51, 40-47.

Peacock, J., Chur-Hansen, A., & Winefield, H. (2012). Mental health implications of human attachment to companion animals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 292-303.

Richardson, L., & Loomis, J. (2009). The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 1535-1548.

Rizzo, T. R., Lefner, J., & Gerardi, M. B. (2008). Clinical management of dog-bite injuries. Clinical Advisor, 11(10), 25-31.

sou. (2005). Hundgöra—att göra hundar som gör nytta, Betänkande av Tjänstehundsutredningen, SOU 2005:75, Stockholm, Sweden.

Souter, M. A., & Miller,M. D. (2007). Do animal-assisted activities effectively treat depression? A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös, 20, 167-180.

Staats, S., Wallace, H., & Anderson, T. (2008). Reasons for companion animal guardianship (pet ownership) from two populations. Society & Animals, 16, 279-291.

Statistics Sweden. (2013). Hundar, katter och andra sällskapsdjur 2012 (Dogs, cats and other pets 2012). Örebro. Sweden.

Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2009). Pet, pest, profit: isolating differences in attitudes towards the treatment of animals. Anthrozoös, 22, 129-135.

Toohey, A. M., & Rock, M. J. (2011). Unleashing their potential: a critical realist scoping review of the influence of dogs on physical activity for dog-owners and non-owners. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 46.

Van Ittersum, K., Joost, M. E., Pennings, B., Wansink, H., & van Trijp, C. M. (2007). The validity of attribute-importance measurement: A review. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1177-1190.

Virués-Ortega, J., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Castellote, J., Población, A. A., & De Pedro-Cuesta, J. (2012). Effect of animal-assisted therapy on the psychological and functional status of elderly populations and patients with psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 6, 197-221.

Wells, D. L. (2007). Domestic dogs and human health: An overview. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 145-156.

Wells, D. L. (2009). The effects of animals on human health and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 523-543.

Wells, D. (2011). The value of pets for human health. The Psychologist, 24, 172-176.

Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Using happiness data for environmental valuation: Issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 385-406.

Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1159-1173.

Figures

  • Conceptual model relating cats and dogs, as resources with functions, to economic values and monetary flows.
    View in gallery
  • Model of Total Economic Value (tev).
    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 174 174 123
Full Text Views 14 14 14
PDF Downloads 4 4 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0